<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

The President needs help!

—Louis Brownlow, 1937

In holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

—Dwight Eisenhower, January 17, 1961

The shock of sputnik

As has been recounted by several of the principal participants, See, e.g., David Z. Beckler, “The Precarious Life of Science in the White House,” in Gerald Holton and William A. Blanpied eds., Science and Its Public: The Changing Relationship (Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1976), 115-34. an October 15, 1957, meeting with the Scientific Advisory Committee to the Office of Defense Mobilization had been on President Eisenhower’s calendar for weeks when the Soviet Union launched Sputnik on October 4. Within days, Congress, the press, and the public were raising serious questions about the adequacy of U.S. science, technology and education. According to Donald Hornig, later science advisor to President Lyndon Johnson, “the degree to which the press and public reacted was totally unexpected and showed an unanticipated understanding of the relation between scientific and technological stature and world power.” Donald Hornig, “The President’s Need for Science Advice: Past and Future,” in William T. Golden ed., Science Advice to the President (New York: Pergamon Press, 1980), 43.

“Our name was mud,” recounted I.I. Rabi, Nobel Laureate in Physics at Columbia University and part-time Chairman of SAC/ODM. I.I. Rabi, “The President and his Scientific Advisers” in Golden, op. cit ., 22. “I advised him [the president] in the presence of the committee that what he needed was a man whom he liked, who would be available full time to work with him right in his office, to help by clarifying the scientific and technological aspects of the decisions which must be made from time to time. He would be part of his brain, so to speak. President Eisenhower readily agreed.” James R. Killian carried Rabi’s proposal one step further by urging “that there be a strong Science Advisory Committee reporting directly to the President who could back up his Adviser.” James Killian, “The Origins and Uses of a Scientific Presence in the White House,” in Golden, op. cit ., 29.

Danish Nobel Laureate Niels Bohr accepting the Atoms for Peace Award from President Dwight Eisenhower ca. 1958. Left to right, Lewis Strauss, Arthur Compton, Bohr, Eisenhower, and James Killlian, Jr. Courtesy of the Niels Bohr Archives, AIP Segre Visual Archives.

Eisenhower was quick to react. In a November 7 nationwide broadcast, he announced Killian’s appointment as his full-time Special Assistant for Science and Technology—a position that became commonly known as the Presidential Science Advisor. On November 27, he announced the reconstitution of SAC/ODM and its re-designation as the President’s Science Advisory Committee (PSAC), consisting solely of non-government scientists and chaired by the president and his science advisor. With the creation of PSAC, the scientific community received what it had long sought: special access to the president.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, A history of federal science policy from the new deal to the present. OpenStax CNX. Jun 26, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11210/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'A history of federal science policy from the new deal to the present' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask