0.3 Allen, a., & Gawlik, m. (july 2009). preparing district and  (Page 10/10)

Kuhn, T.S. (1966). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Levin, H.M.&Belfield, C.R. (2003). The marketplace in education. Review of Research in Education, 27 , 183-219.

Levine, (2005). Educating School Leaders. Washington, D.C. : The Educating Schools Project. Retrieved February 15, 2009 from http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Final313.pdf

Loveless, T. (2003). The Brown center annual report on education: How well are American students learning? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Lubienski, C. (2004). Charter school innovation in theory and practice: Autonomy, R&D, and curricular conformity. In K. Bulkley&P. Wohlstetter (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What’s happened and what’s next? (pp. 72-92). New York: Teachers’ College Press.

Lubienski, C. (2003). Instrumentalist perspectives on the `public' in public education: Incentives and purposes. Educational Policy 17, 478-502

Marzano, R.J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, VA.

McCabe, C.&McCarthy, M. (2005). Educating school leaders for social justice. Educational Policy , 19(1), 201-222.

Mintrom, M. (2003). Market Organizations and Deliberative Democracy: Choice and Voice in Public Service Delivery. Administration and Society, 35, 52-81.

Mintrom, M. (1997). State-local nexus in policy innovation diffusion: The case of school choice. The Journal of Federalism, 7 (3), 41-60.

Miron, G. (2008). The shifting notion of publicness in public education. In Cooper, B., Cibulka, J.,&Fusarelli, L. (eds.) Handbook of Education Politics and Policy. New York: Routledge, 338-349.

Miron, G. and Nelson, C. (2002). What’s public about charter schools: Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press, Inc.

Nathan, J. (1996). Charter Schools: Creating Hope and Opportunity for American Education . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Perez, A. L., Milstein, M. M., Wood, C. J., Jacquez, D. (1999). How to turn a school around: What principals can do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Riehl, C. J. (2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: A review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70, 55-81.

Rose, L.C.,&Gallup, A.M. (2006). The 38th annual Phi Delta Kappan/Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 88( 1), 41-56.

Senge, P., (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Currency Doubleday.

Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sergiovanni, T. (1994). Building community in schools . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Solomon, L., Paark, K.,&Garcia, D. (2001). Does charter school attendance improve test scores? The Arizona results (Arizona education analysis). Phoenix: The Center for Market-Based Education, Goldwater Institute.

Texas Education Agency (2001). Texas open-enrollment charter schools: Fourth year evaluation. Austin: Texas Center for Educational Research.

Texas Education Agency (2002). Texas open-enrollment charter schools: Fourth year evaluation. Austin: Author.

Usdan, M.D. (2002). Reactions to articles commissioned by the National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership Preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 300-307.

Van Meter, E.&Murphy, J. (1997). Using ISLLC standards to strengthen preparation programs in school administration . Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Vergari, S. (2007). The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy, 21 (1), 15-39.

Wells, A.S., Grutzik, C., Carnochan, S., Slayton, J.&Vasudeva, A. (1999). Underlying policy assumptions of charter school reform: The multiple meanings of the movement. Teachers College Record, 100 (3), 513-535.

Appendix a: isllc standards

Standard 1: A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by the school community.

Standard 2: A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth.

Standard 3: A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by ensuring management of the organization, operations, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.

Standard 4 : A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by collaborating with families and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources.

Standard 5:  A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner.

Standard 6:  A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the success of all students by understanding, responding to, and influencing the larger political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context.