<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
  • Use the method of Lagrange multipliers to solve optimization problems with one constraint.
  • Use the method of Lagrange multipliers to solve optimization problems with two constraints.

Solving optimization problems for functions of two or more variables can be similar to solving such problems in single-variable calculus. However, techniques for dealing with multiple variables allow us to solve more varied optimization problems for which we need to deal with additional conditions or constraints. In this section, we examine one of the more common and useful methods for solving optimization problems with constraints.

Lagrange multipliers

[link] was an applied situation involving maximizing a profit function, subject to certain constraints . In that example, the constraints involved a maximum number of golf balls that could be produced and sold in 1 month ( x ) , and a maximum number of advertising hours that could be purchased per month ( y ) . Suppose these were combined into a budgetary constraint, such as 20 x + 4 y 216 , that took into account the cost of producing the golf balls and the number of advertising hours purchased per month. The goal is, still, be to maximize profit, but now there is a different type of constraint on the values of x and y . This constraint, when combined with the profit function f ( x , y ) = 48 x + 96 y x 2 2 x y 9 y 2 , is an example of an optimization problem    , and the function f ( x , y ) is called the objective function    . A graph of various level curves of the function f ( x , y ) follows.

A series of rotated ellipses that become increasingly large. The smallest one is marked f(x, y) = 400, and the biggest one is marked f(x, y) = 150.
Graph of level curves of the function f ( x , y ) = 48 x + 96 y x 2 2 x y 9 y 2 corresponding to c = 150 , 250 , 350 , and 400 .

In [link] , the value c represents different profit levels (i.e., values of the function f ) . As the value of c increases, the curve shifts to the right. Since our goal is to maximize profit, we want to choose a curve as far to the right as possible. If there was no restriction on the number of golf balls the company could produce, or the number of units of advertising available, then we could produce as many golf balls as we want, and advertise as much as we want, and there would be not be a maximum profit for the company. Unfortunately, we have a budgetary constraint that is modeled by the inequality 20 x + 4 y 216 . To see how this constraint interacts with the profit function, [link] shows the graph of the line 20 x + 4 y = 216 superimposed on the previous graph.

A series of rotated ellipses that become increasingly large. On the smallest ellipse, which is red, there is a tangent line marked with equation 20x + 4y = 216 that appears to touch the ellipse near (10, 4).
Graph of level curves of the function f ( x , y ) = 48 x + 96 y x 2 2 x y 9 y 2 corresponding to c = 150 , 250 , 350 , and 395 . The red graph is the constraint function.

As mentioned previously, the maximum profit occurs when the level curve is as far to the right as possible. However, the level of production corresponding to this maximum profit must also satisfy the budgetary constraint, so the point at which this profit occurs must also lie on (or to the left of) the red line in [link] . Inspection of this graph reveals that this point exists where the line is tangent to the level curve of f . Trial and error reveals that this profit level seems to be around 395 , when x and y are both just less than 5 . We return to the solution of this problem later in this section. From a theoretical standpoint, at the point where the profit curve is tangent to the constraint line, the gradient of both of the functions evaluated at that point must point in the same (or opposite) direction. Recall that the gradient of a function of more than one variable is a vector. If two vectors point in the same (or opposite) directions, then one must be a constant multiple of the other. This idea is the basis of the method of Lagrange multipliers    .

Questions & Answers

calculate molarity of NaOH solution when 25.0ml of NaOH titrated with 27.2ml of 0.2m H2SO4
Gasin Reply
what's Thermochemistry
rhoda Reply
the study of the heat energy which is associated with chemical reactions
Kaddija
How was CH4 and o2 was able to produce (Co2)and (H2o
Edafe Reply
explain please
Victory
First twenty elements with their valences
Martine Reply
what is chemistry
asue Reply
what is atom
asue
what is the best way to define periodic table for jamb
Damilola Reply
what is the change of matter from one state to another
Elijah Reply
what is isolation of organic compounds
IKyernum Reply
what is atomic radius
ThankGod Reply
Read Chapter 6, section 5
Dr
Read Chapter 6, section 5
Kareem
Atomic radius is the radius of the atom and is also called the orbital radius
Kareem
atomic radius is the distance between the nucleus of an atom and its valence shell
Amos
Read Chapter 6, section 5
paulino
Bohr's model of the theory atom
Ayom Reply
is there a question?
Dr
when a gas is compressed why it becomes hot?
ATOMIC
It has no oxygen then
Goldyei
read the chapter on thermochemistry...the sections on "PV" work and the First Law of Thermodynamics should help..
Dr
Which element react with water
Mukthar Reply
Mgo
Ibeh
an increase in the pressure of a gas results in the decrease of its
Valentina Reply
definition of the periodic table
Cosmos Reply
What is the lkenes
Da Reply
what were atoms composed of?
Moses Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply
Practice Key Terms 5

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Calculus volume 3. OpenStax CNX. Feb 05, 2016 Download for free at http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col11966/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Calculus volume 3' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask