<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
We now wish to extend the definition of the integral to a wider class of functions. This class will consist of thosefunctions that are uniform limits of step functions. The requirement that these limits be uniform is crucial.Pointwise limits of step functions doesn't work, as we will see in the first exercise.The initial step in carrying out this generalization is the following.

We now wish to extend the definition of the integral to a wider class of functions. This class will consist of thosefunctions that are uniform limits of step functions. The requirement that these limits be uniform is crucial.Pointwise limits of step functions doesn't work, as we will see in [link] below. The initial step in carrying out this generalization is the following.

Let [ a , b ] be a closed bounded interval, and let { h n } be a sequence of step functions that converges uniformly to a function f on [ a , b ] . Then the sequence { h n } is a convergent sequence of real numbers.

We will show that { h n } is a Cauchy sequence in R . Thus, given an ϵ > 0 , choose an N such that for any n N and any x [ a , b ] , we have

| f ( x ) - h n ( x ) | < ϵ 2 ( b - a ) .

Then, for any m and n both N and any x [ a , b ] , we have

| h n ( x ) - h m ( x ) | | h n ( x ) - f ( x ) | + | f ( x ) - h m ( x ) | < ϵ b - a .

Therefore,

| h n - h m | = | ( h n - h m ) | | h n - h m | ϵ b - a = ϵ ,

as desired.

The preceding theorem provides us with a perfectly good idea of how to define the integral of a function f that is the uniform limit of a sequence of step functions.However, we first need to establish another kind of consistency result.

If { h n } and { k n } are two sequences of step functions on [ a , b ] , each converging uniformly to the same function f , then

lim h n = lim k n .

Given ϵ > 0 , choose N so that if n N , then | h n ( x ) - f ( x ) | < ϵ / ( 2 ( b - a ) ) for all x [ a , b ] , and such that | f ( x ) - k n ( x ) | < ϵ / ( 2 ( b - a ) ) for all x [ a , b ] . Then, | h n ( x ) - k n ( x ) | < ϵ / ( b - a ) for all x [ a , b ] if n N . So,

| h n - k n | | h n - k n | ϵ b - a = ϵ

if n N . Taking limits gives

| lim h n - lim k n | ϵ .

Since this is true for arbitrary ϵ > 0 , it follows that lim h n = lim k n , as desired.

Let [ a , b ] be a closed bounded interval of real numbers. A function f : [ a , b ] R is called integrable on [ a , b ] if it is the uniform limit of a sequence { h n } of step functions.

Let I ( [ a , b ] ) denote the set of all functions that are integrable on [ a , b ] . If f I ( [ a , b ] ) , define the integral of f , denoted f , by

f = lim h n ,

where { h n } is some (any) sequence of step functions that converges uniformly to f on [ a , b ] .

As in the case of step functions, we use the following notations:

f = a b f = a b f ( t ) d t .

REMARK Note that [link] is crucial in order that this definition be unambiguous.Indeed, we will see below that this critical consistency result is one place where uniform limits of step functions works whilepointwise limits do not. See parts (c) and (d) of [link] . Note also that it follows from this definition that a a f = 0 , because a a h = 0 for any step function. In fact, we will derive almost everything about the integral of a general integrable functionfrom the corresponding results about the integral of a step function. No surprise. This is the essence of mathematical analysis, approximation.

Define a function f on the closed interval [ 0 , 1 ] by f ( x ) = 1 if x is a rational number and f ( x ) = 0 if x is an irrational number.

  1. Suppose h is a step function on [ 0 , 1 ] . Prove that there must exist an x [ 0 , 1 ] such that | f ( x ) - h ( x ) | 1 / 2 . HINT: Let ( x i - 1 , x i ) be an interval on which h is a constant c . Now use the fact that there are both rationals and irrationals in this interval.
  2. Prove that f is not the uniform limit of a sequence of step functions. That is, f is not an integrable function.
  3. Consider the two sequences { h n } and { k n } of step functions defined on the interval [ 0 , 1 ] by h n = χ ( 0 , 1 / n ) , and k n = n χ ( 0 , 1 / n ) . Show that both sequences { h n } and { k n } converge pointwise to the 0 function on [ 0 , 1 ] . HINT: All functions are 0 at x = 0 . For x > 0 , choose N so that 1 / N < x . Then, for any n N , h n ( x ) = k n ( x ) = 0 .
  4. Let h n and k n be as in part (c). Show that lim h n = 0 , but lim k n = 1 . Conclude that the consistency result in [link] does not hold for pointwise limits of step functions.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Analysis of functions of a single variable. OpenStax CNX. Dec 11, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11249/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask