<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Mathematical model

Biochemical model

Ach simulation

ACH flow was simulated by using forward finite difference for time and central finite difference for space to find an explicit solution to two-dimensional heat flow. The diffusion coefficient of ACH was calculated from [link] .

[ A C H ] t = α [ A C H ] x x + [ A C H ] y y α = 0 . 4 n m 2 n s - 1

It was found experimentally that using a time step of 0.25 ns for explicit solution gave similar results as using a Gaussian lowpass filter matrix to represent a rotational symmetric point surface distribution. Since the Gaussian filter matrix, B, is built into MATLAB, it is computed faster, and thus was used for the simulation. In equation 2, B is the 3 by 3 matrix from a Gaussian lowpass filter matrix with σ = 0 . 4 . In MATLAB, B = f s p e c i a l ( ' g a u s s i a n ' , 3 , 0 . 4 ) . Time is scaled to increments of 0.25 ns.

[ A C H ] x , y t + 1 = i = - 1 1 j = - 1 1 β i , j [ A C H ] x + i , y + j t β i , j = B ( 2 + i , 2 + j )

The synaptic cleft was represented by a two-dimensional grid of length 100 nm. The width was varied from 20 to 60 nm to represent the changing distance in edematous conditions. Each cell (x, y) on the grid was 1 nm × 1 nm, and contained the concentration for that cell at a given time (t), represented in equation 2 as [ A C H ] x , y t . The initial concentration at each cell was 0 μ M , except at the neuron terminal, where the ACH was released by exocytosis at concentrations of 1000 μ M in the row of cells from [ A C H ] 45 , 2 to [ A C H ] 54 , 2 . Homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions were used at all boundaries except at the release site and receptor site, which were made impenetrable. These impenetrable boundaries were the row of cells from [ A C H ] 36 , 1 to [ A C H ] 63 , 1 (neuron release site) and [ A C H ] 36 , ζ to [ A C H ] 63 , ζ (membrane receptor site), where ζ was the synaptic cleft width.

Calcium control

ACH receptors influence IP3 levels, which affect cell potential, potassium channel probability, SR calcium, and intracellular calcium. The IP3 model was adapted from [link] and the remaining differential equations were adapted from [link] .

d [ I P 3 ] d t = [ A C H ] - ϵ [ I P 3 ] - V M 4 [ I P 3 ] u [ I P 3 ] u + K 4 u + P M V ( 1 - [ E ] r 2 ) K V r 2 + [ E ] r 2 d [ C a S R 2 + ] d t = B [ C a 2 + ] 2 [ C a 2 + ] 2 + C b 2 - C [ C a S R 2 + ] 2 [ C a 2 + ] 4 ( [ C a S R 2 + ] 2 + s c 2 ) ( [ C a 2 + ] 4 + c c 4 ) - L [ C a S R 2 + ] d [ W ] d t = λ ( [ C a 2 + ] + c W ) 2 ( [ C a 2 + ] + c W ) 2 + β e - ( [ E ] - v C a 3 R K ) - [ W ] d [ E ] d t = γ ( - F N a K - G C l ( [ E ] - v C l ) - 2 G C a ( [ E ] - v C a 1 ) 1 + e - [ E ] - v C a 2 R C a - G N C X [ C a 2 + ] ( [ E ] - v N C X ) [ C a 2 + ] + c N C X - G K [ W ] ( [ E ] - v K ) ) d [ C a 2 + ] d t = F [ I P 3 ] 2 [ I P 3 ] 2 + K r 2 - G C a ( [ E ] - v C a 1 1 + e - ( [ E ] - v C a 2 R C a ) + G N C X [ C a 2 + ] ( [ E ] - v N C X ) [ C a 2 + ] + c N C X - B [ C a 2 + ] 2 [ C a 2 + ] 2 + C b 2 + C [ C a S R 2 + ] 2 [ C a 2 + ] 4 ( [ C a S R 2 + ] 2 + s c 2 ) ( [ C a 2 + ] 4 + c c 4 ) - D [ C a 2 + ] ( 1 + ( [ E ] - v d ) R d + L [ C a S R 2 + ]
[ A C H ] 0 = 0 . 001 μ M Initial ACH concentration
[ I P 3 ] 0 = 0 . 49 μ M Initial IP3 concentration
[ C a S R 2 + ] 0 = 1 . 1 μ M Initial sarcoplasmic calcium concentration
[ W ] 0 = 0 . 02 Initial potassium channel probability concentration
[ E ] 0 = - 42 m V Initial cell potential
[ C a 2 + ] 0 = 0 . 17 μ M Initial intracellular calcium concentration
β = 0 . 13 μ M 2 translation factor [link]
γ = 197 m V μ M - 1 scaling factor [link]
ϵ = 0 . 015 s - 1 rate constant for linear IP3 [link]
λ = 45 channel constant [link]
B = 2 . 025 μ M s - 1 SR uptake rate constant [link]
C = 55 μ M s - 1 CICR rate constant [link]
D = 0 . 24 s - 1 Ca extrusion by ATPase constant [link]
F = 0 . 23 μ M s - 1 maximal influx rate [link]
L = 0 . 025 s - 1 leak from SR rate constant [link]
C b = 1 μ M half point SR ATPase activation [link]
c c = 0 . 9 μ M half point CICR activation [link]
c N C X = 0 . 5 μ M half point Na Ca exchange activation [link]
c W = 0 . 0 μ M translation factor [link]
F N a K = 0 . 0432 μ M s - 1 net whole cell flux [link]
G C a = 0 . 00129 μ M m V - 1 s - 1 whole cell conductance for VOCCs [link]
G C l = 0 . 00134 μ M m V - 1 s - 1 whole cell conductance Cl [link]
G K = 0 . 00446 μ M m V - 1 s - 1 whole cell conductance K [link]
G N C X = 0 . 00316 μ M m V - 1 s - 1 whole cell conductance for Na Ca exchange [link]
K 4 = 0 . 5 μ M half saturation constant IP3 degradation [link]
K r = 1 μ M half saturation constant Ca entry [link]
K V = - 58 m V half saturation constant IP3 voltage synthesis [link]
P M V = 0 . 01333 μ M s - 1 max rate voltage IP3 synthesis [link]
R 2 = 8 hill coefficient [link]
R C a = 8 . 5 m V maximum slope of VOCC activation [link]
R d = 250 . 0 m V slope of voltage dependence [link]
R K = 12 . 0 m V maximum slope Ca activation [link]
s c = 2 μ M half point CICR efflux [link]
u = 4 hill coefficient [link]
v C a 1 = 100 . 0 m V reversal potential VOCCs [link]
v C a 2 = - 24 m V half point VOCC activation [link]
v C a 3 = - 27 m V half point Ca channel activation [link]
v C l = - 25 m V reversal potential Cl [link]
v d = - 100 . 0 m V intercept voltage dependence [link]
v K = - 104 . 0 m V reversal potential K [link]
V M 4 = 0 . 0333 μ M s - 1 max nonlinear IP degradation [link]
v N C X = - 40 . 0 m V reversal potential Na Ca exchange [link]

Questions & Answers

Ayele, K., 2003. Introductory Economics, 3rd ed., Addis Ababa.
Widad Reply
can you send the book attached ?
Ariel
?
Ariel
What is economics
Widad Reply
the study of how humans make choices under conditions of scarcity
AI-Robot
U(x,y) = (x×y)1/2 find mu of x for y
Desalegn Reply
U(x,y) = (x×y)1/2 find mu of x for y
Desalegn
what is ecnomics
Jan Reply
this is the study of how the society manages it's scarce resources
Belonwu
what is macroeconomic
John Reply
macroeconomic is the branch of economics which studies actions, scale, activities and behaviour of the aggregate economy as a whole.
husaini
etc
husaini
difference between firm and industry
husaini Reply
what's the difference between a firm and an industry
Abdul
firm is the unit which transform inputs to output where as industry contain combination of firms with similar production 😅😅
Abdulraufu
Suppose the demand function that a firm faces shifted from Qd  120 3P to Qd  90  3P and the supply function has shifted from QS  20  2P to QS 10  2P . a) Find the effect of this change on price and quantity. b) Which of the changes in demand and supply is higher?
Toofiq Reply
explain standard reason why economic is a science
innocent Reply
factors influencing supply
Petrus Reply
what is economic.
Milan Reply
scares means__________________ends resources. unlimited
Jan
economics is a science that studies human behaviour as a relationship b/w ends and scares means which have alternative uses
Jan
calculate the profit maximizing for demand and supply
Zarshad Reply
Why qualify 28 supplies
Milan
what are explicit costs
Nomsa Reply
out-of-pocket costs for a firm, for example, payments for wages and salaries, rent, or materials
AI-Robot
concepts of supply in microeconomics
David Reply
economic overview notes
Amahle Reply
identify a demand and a supply curve
Salome Reply
i don't know
Parul
there's a difference
Aryan
Demand curve shows that how supply and others conditions affect on demand of a particular thing and what percent demand increase whith increase of supply of goods
Israr
Hi Sir please how do u calculate Cross elastic demand and income elastic demand?
Abari
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, The art of the pfug. OpenStax CNX. Jun 05, 2013 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10523/1.34
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'The art of the pfug' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask