This page is optimized for mobile devices, if you would prefer the desktop version just click here

0.5 Conclusion

A brief comparison of specialties of PCA, ICA, and NMF.

From the intuition behind the mathematical formulation and the results given by our chosen dataset, we reach the conclusion that different matrix factorization techniques work well towards different ends:

NMF works well for modeling non-negative data such as images. It finds sparse and parts-based representation of the data.

ICA works well for finding independent sources when the data isn’t Gaussian.

PCA has much broader application than ICA and NMF; it is ideal for pattern recognition and dimension reduction.

<< Chapter < Page Page > Chapter >>

Read also:

OpenStax, Comparison of three different matrix factorization techniques for unsupervised machine learning. OpenStax CNX. Dec 18, 2013 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11602/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.
Jobilize.com uses cookies to ensure that you get the best experience. By continuing to use Jobilize.com web-site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.