<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
Use the formula to find the inverse of matrix Verify your answer by augmenting with the identity matrix.
Find the inverse, if it exists, of the given matrix.
We will use the method of augmenting with the identity.
Unfortunately, we do not have a formula similar to the one for a matrix to find the inverse of a matrix. Instead, we will augment the original matrix with the identity matrix and use row operations to obtain the inverse.
Given a matrix
augment with the identity matrix
To begin, we write the augmented matrix with the identity on the right and on the left. Performing elementary row operations so that the identity matrix appears on the left, we will obtain the inverse matrix on the right. We will find the inverse of this matrix in the next example.
Given a matrix, find the inverse
Given the matrix find the inverse.
Augment with the identity matrix, and then begin row operations until the identity matrix replaces The matrix on the right will be the inverse of
Thus,
Solving a system of linear equations using the inverse of a matrix requires the definition of two new matrices: is the matrix representing the variables of the system, and is the matrix representing the constants. Using matrix multiplication , we may define a system of equations with the same number of equations as variables as
To solve a system of linear equations using an inverse matrix , let be the coefficient matrix , let be the variable matrix, and let be the constant matrix. Thus, we want to solve a system For example, look at the following system of equations.
From this system, the coefficient matrix is
The variable matrix is
And the constant matrix is
Then looks like
Recall the discussion earlier in this section regarding multiplying a real number by its inverse, To solve a single linear equation for we would simply multiply both sides of the equation by the multiplicative inverse (reciprocal) of Thus,
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Precalculus' conversation and receive update notifications?