12.1 The biot-savart law  (Page 2/4)

 Page 2 / 4

Calculating magnetic fields of short current segments

A short wire of length 1.0 cm carries a current of 2.0 A in the vertical direction ( [link] ). The rest of the wire is shielded so it does not add to the magnetic field produced by the wire. Calculate the magnetic field at point P , which is 1 meter from the wire in the x -direction.

Strategy

We can determine the magnetic field at point P using the Biot-Savart law. Since the current segment is much smaller than the distance x , we can drop the integral from the expression. The integration is converted back into a summation, but only for small dl , which we now write as $\text{Δ}l.$ Another way to think about it is that each of the radius values is nearly the same, no matter where the current element is on the line segment, if $\text{Δ}l$ is small compared to x . The angle $\theta$ is calculated using a tangent function. Using the numbers given, we can calculate the magnetic field at P .

Solution

The angle between $\text{Δ}\stackrel{\to }{l}$ and $\stackrel{^}{r}$ is calculated from trigonometry, knowing the distances l and x from the problem:

$\theta ={\text{tan}}^{-1}\left(\frac{1\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}}{0.01\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}}\right)=89.4\text{°}.$

The magnetic field at point P is calculated by the Biot-Savart law:

$B=\frac{{\mu }_{0}}{4\pi }\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{I\text{Δ}l\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{sin}\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}\theta }{{r}^{2}}=\left(1\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-7}\text{T}\cdot \text{m/A}\right)\left(\frac{2\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{A}\left(0.01\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}\right)\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}\text{sin}\left(89.4\text{°}\right)}{{\left(1\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\text{m}\right)}^{2}}\right)=2.0\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-9}\text{T}.$

From the right-hand rule and the Biot-Savart law, the field is directed into the page.

Significance

This approximation is only good if the length of the line segment is very small compared to the distance from the current element to the point. If not, the integral form of the Biot-Savart law must be used over the entire line segment to calculate the magnetic field.

Check Your Understanding Using [link] , at what distance would P have to be to measure a magnetic field half of the given answer?

1.41 meters

Calculating magnetic field of a circular arc of wire

A wire carries a current I in a circular arc with radius R swept through an arbitrary angle $\theta$ ( [link] ). Calculate the magnetic field at the center of this arc at point P .

Strategy

We can determine the magnetic field at point P using the Biot-Savart law. The radial and path length directions are always at a right angle, so the cross product turns into multiplication. We also know that the distance along the path dl is related to the radius times the angle $\theta$ (in radians). Then we can pull all constants out of the integration and solve for the magnetic field.

Solution

The Biot-Savart law starts with the following equation:

$\stackrel{\to }{B}=\frac{{\mu }_{0}}{4\pi }\underset{\text{wire}}{\int }\frac{Id\stackrel{\to }{l}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\stackrel{^}{r}}{{r}^{2}}.$

As we integrate along the arc, all the contributions to the magnetic field are in the same direction (out of the page), so we can work with the magnitude of the field. The cross product turns into multiplication because the path dl and the radial direction are perpendicular. We can also substitute the arc length formula, $dl=rd\theta$ :

$B=\frac{{\mu }_{0}}{4\pi }\underset{\text{wire}}{\int }\frac{Ir\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}d\theta }{{r}^{2}}.$

The current and radius can be pulled out of the integral because they are the same regardless of where we are on the path. This leaves only the integral over the angle,

$B=\frac{{\mu }_{0}I}{4\pi r}\underset{\text{wire}}{\int }d\theta .$

The angle varies on the wire from 0 to $\theta$ ; hence, the result is

$B=\frac{{\mu }_{0}I\theta }{4\pi r}.$

Significance

The direction of the magnetic field at point P is determined by the right-hand rule, as shown in the previous chapter. If there are other wires in the diagram along with the arc, and you are asked to find the net magnetic field, find each contribution from a wire or arc and add the results by superposition of vectors. Make sure to pay attention to the direction of each contribution. Also note that in a symmetric situation, like a straight or circular wire, contributions from opposite sides of point P cancel each other.

Check Your Understanding The wire loop forms a full circle of radius R and current I . What is the magnitude of the magnetic field at the center?

$\frac{{\mu }_{0}I}{2R}$

Summary

• The magnetic field created by a current-carrying wire is found by the Biot-Savart law.
• The current element $Id\stackrel{\to }{l}$ produces a magnetic field a distance r away.

Conceptual questions

For calculating magnetic fields, what are the advantages and disadvantages of the Biot-Savart law?

Biot-Savart law’s advantage is that it works with any magnetic field produced by a current loop. The disadvantage is that it can take a long time.

Describe the magnetic field due to the current in two wires connected to the two terminals of a source of emf and twisted tightly around each other.

How can you decide if a wire is infinite?

If you were to go to the start of a line segment and calculate the angle $\theta$ to be approximately $0\text{°}$ , the wire can be considered infinite. This judgment is based also on the precision you need in the result.

Identical currents are carried in two circular loops; however, one loop has twice the diameter as the other loop. Compare the magnetic fields created by the loops at the center of each loop.

Problems

A 10-A current flows through the wire shown. What is the magnitude of the magnetic field due to a 0.5-mm segment of wire as measured at (a) point A and (b) point B?

Ten amps flow through a square loop where each side is 20 cm in length. At each corner of the loop is a 0.01-cm segment that connects the longer wires as shown. Calculate the magnitude of the magnetic field at the center of the loop.

$1\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}×\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{10}^{-8}\text{T}$

What is the magnetic field at P due to the current I in the wire shown?

The accompanying figure shows a current loop consisting of two concentric circular arcs and two perpendicular radial lines. Determine the magnetic field at point P.

$B=\frac{{\mu }_{o}I}{8}\left(\frac{1}{a}-\phantom{\rule{0.05em}{0ex}}\frac{1}{b}\right)$ out of the page

Find the magnetic field at the center C of the rectangular loop of wire shown in the accompanying figure.

Two long wires, one of which has a semicircular bend of radius R , are positioned as shown in the accompanying figure. If both wires carry a current I , how far apart must their parallel sections be so that the net magnetic field at P is zero? Does the current in the straight wire flow up or down?

$a=\frac{2R}{\pi }$ ; the current in the wire to the right must flow up the page.

What is differential form of Gauss's law?
help me out on this question the permittivity of diamond is 1.46*10^-10.( a)what is the dielectric of diamond (b) what its susceptibility
a body is projected vertically upward of 30kmp/h how long will it take to reach a point 0.5km bellow e point of projection
i have to say. who cares. lol. why know that t all
Jeff
is this just a chat app about the openstax book?
kya ye b.sc ka hai agar haa to konsa part
what is charge quantization
it means that the total charge of a body will always be the integral multiples of basic unit charge ( e ) q = ne n : no of electrons or protons e : basic unit charge 1e = 1.602×10^-19
Riya
is the time quantized ? how ?
Mehmet
What do you meanby the statement,"Is the time quantized"
Mayowa
Can you give an explanation.
Mayowa
there are some comment on the time -quantized..
Mehmet
time is integer of the planck time, discrete..
Mehmet
planck time is travel in planck lenght of light..
Mehmet
it's says that charges does not occur in continuous form rather they are integral multiple of the elementary charge of an electron.
Tamoghna
it is just like bohr's theory. Which was angular momentum of electron is intral multiple of h/2π
determine absolute zero
The properties of a system during a reversible constant pressure non-flow process at P= 1.6bar, changes from constant volume of 0.3m³/kg at 20°C to a volume of 0.55m³/kg at 260°C. its constant pressure process is 3.205KJ/kg°C Determine: 1. Heat added, Work done, Change in Internal Energy and Change in Enthalpy
U can easily calculate work done by 2.303log(v2/v1)
Abhishek
Amount of heat added through q=ncv^delta t
Abhishek
Change in internal energy through q=Q-w
Abhishek
please how do dey get 5/9 in the conversion of Celsius and Fahrenheit
what is copper loss
this is the energy dissipated(usually in the form of heat energy) in conductors such as wires and coils due to the flow of current against the resistance of the material used in winding the coil.
Henry
it is the work done in moving a charge to a point from infinity against electric field
what is the weight of the earth in space
As w=mg where m is mass and g is gravitational force... Now if we consider the earth is in gravitational pull of sun we have to use the value of "g" of sun, so we can find the weight of eaeth in sun with reference to sun...
Prince
g is not gravitacional forcé, is acceleration of gravity of earth and is assumed constante. the "sun g" can not be constant and you should use Newton gravity forcé. by the way its not the "weight" the physical quantity that matters, is the mass
Jorge
Yeah got it... Earth and moon have specific value of g... But in case of sun ☀ it is just a huge sphere of gas...
Prince
Thats why it can't have a constant value of g ....
Prince
not true. you must know Newton gravity Law . even a cloud of gas it has mass thats al matters. and the distsnce from the center of mass of the cloud and the center of the mass of the earth
Jorge
please why is the first law of thermodynamics greater than the second
every law is important, but first law is conservation of energy, this state is the basic in physics, in this case first law is more important than other laws..
Mehmet
First Law describes o energy is changed from one form to another but not destroyed, but that second Law talk about entropy of a system increasing gradually
Mayowa
first law describes not destroyer energy to changed the form, but second law describes the fluid drection that is entropy. in this case first law is more basic accorging to me...
Mehmet
define electric image.obtain expression for electric intensity at any point on earthed conducting infinite plane due to a point charge Q placed at a distance D from it.
explain the lack of symmetry in the field of the parallel capacitor
pls. explain the lack of symmetry in the field of the parallel capacitor
Phoebe