<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
This same logic explains the behavior of gyroscopes. [link] shows the two forces acting on a spinning gyroscope. The torque produced is perpendicular to the angular momentum, thus the direction of the torque is changed, but not its magnitude. The gyroscope precesses around a vertical axis, since the torque is always horizontal and perpendicular to $\mathbf{\text{L}}$ . If the gyroscope is not spinning, it acquires angular momentum in the direction of the torque ( $\mathbf{\text{L}}=\text{\Delta}\mathbf{\text{L}}$ ), and it rotates around a horizontal axis, falling over just as we would expect.
Earth itself acts like a gigantic gyroscope. Its angular momentum is along its axis and points at Polaris, the North Star. But Earth is slowly precessing (once in about 26,000 years) due to the torque of the Sun and the Moon on its nonspherical shape.
Rotational kinetic energy is associated with angular momentum? Does that mean that rotational kinetic energy is a vector?
No, energy is always a scalar whether motion is involved or not. No form of energy has a direction in space and you can see that rotational kinetic energy does not depend on the direction of motion just as linear kinetic energy is independent of the direction of motion.
While driving his motorcycle at highway speed, a physics student notices that pulling back lightly on the right handlebar tips the cycle to the left and produces a left turn. Explain why this happens.
Gyroscopes used in guidance systems to indicate directions in space must have an angular momentum that does not change in direction. Yet they are often subjected to large forces and accelerations. How can the direction of their angular momentum be constant when they are accelerated?
Integrated Concepts
The axis of Earth makes a 23.5° angle with a direction perpendicular to the plane of Earth’s orbit. As shown in [link] , this axis precesses, making one complete rotation in 25,780 y.
(a) Calculate the change in angular momentum in half this time.
(b) What is the average torque producing this change in angular momentum?
(c) If this torque were created by a single force (it is not) acting at the most effective point on the equator, what would its magnitude be?
(a) $5\text{.}\text{64}\times {\text{10}}^{\text{33}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{kg}\cdot {\text{m}}^{2}\text{/s}$
(b) $1\text{.}\text{39}\times {\text{10}}^{\text{22}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{N}\cdot \text{m}$
(c) $2\text{.}\text{17}\times {\text{10}}^{\text{15}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{N}$
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Physics 101' conversation and receive update notifications?