<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
Kim Tucker's contribution to the "OSS and OER in Education Series." In this post, he touches on a number of related topics that integrate Free Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) and free knowledge and equality in education, while also posing questions about what we mean by equality in education and the implications for digital inclusion. The term “libre” distinguishes freeware (gratis software) from free software, which encompasses use, modification, and distribution.

Author - Kim Tucker, "FLOSS, OER, Equality and Digital Inclusion". Originally submitted May 2nd, 2007 to the OSS and OER in Education Series, Terra Incognita blog (Penn State World Campus), edited by Ken Udas.

Floss, oer, equality and digital inclusion

This posting is intended to direct the discussion towards the rationale for software libre in education and the broader impact on sustainable development .

I start by revisiting the topic for the series, and share some experiences to re-emphasise a few of the points made in previous postings. I move on torecontextualise the discussion with respect to the big picture, pose some questions for discussion and invite participants to suggest additional questions which may arise

Topic revisited

Regarding the topic, “Impact of OSS on Education,” I suspect that both education and software development are subject to similar influences astechnology enables connections among people with common interests and learning needs.

For example, it is difficult to determine the impact of FLOSS (Free Libre Open Source Software) on education - the context is enabling educators and learners to benefit from the connectednessFLOSS communities have enjoyed and made good use of for more than a decade. Knowledge sharing across FLOSS and OER communities seems to have streamlined (stimulated, facilitated and catalysed) FLOSS adoption and technology-assisted collaborative learning in the education space. SeveralFLOSS projects have been pedagogically inspired (e.g. Moodle , Fle3 , Kewl.NextGen , etc.), while others have been orientated (initially or primarily) towards administration (e.g. Sakai , SchoolTool , etc.).

FLOSS communities, and more recently Wikipedia communities, have been inspirational in demonstrating what can be achieved through commons-based peer production . We are rising to the challenge of realising this level of success in education through libre and open resources for education. Efforts in this direction include Connexions , Wikieducator and eXe , Le Mill , EduCommons , Wikiversity , and many more.

All of these run on FLOSS platforms, all have followed open (transparent) development processes, and all carefully consider open standards and reusability of learningcomponents (variously called learning objects, iDevices, etc, …).

However, for reusability in education, “localisation/ recontextualisation is always required.” The educational and learning needs varyacross contexts. Interestingly, agile software development teams seldom code for re-use unless development of re-usable components is core to their business (Alistair Cockburn, late 1990s,Cape Town; see for example DoTheSimplestThingThatCouldPossiblyWork ).

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, The impact of open source software on education. OpenStax CNX. Mar 30, 2009 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10431/1.7
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'The impact of open source software on education' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask