Let
be a fixed closed bounded interval in
and let
denote the set of all step functions on
- Using Part (c) of
[link] ,
prove that the set
is a vector space of functions;
i.e., it is closed under addition and scalar multiplication.
- Show that
is closed under multiplication;
i.e., if
then
- Show that
is closed under taking maximum and minimum
and that it contains all the real-valued constant functions.
- We call a function
an
indicator function if it equals 1 on an interval
and is 0 outside
To be precise, we will denote this indicator function by
Prove that every indicator function is a step function, and show also that every step function
is a linear combination
of indicator functions:
- Define a function
on
by
setting
if
is a rational number and
if
is an irrational number. Prove that the range of
is a finite set, but that
is
not a step function.
Our first theorem in this chapter is a fundamental consistency result
about the “area under the graph” of a step function.Of course, the graph of a step function looks like a collection of horizontal line segments,
and the region under this graph is just a collection of rectangles.Actually, in this remark, we are
implicitly thinking that the values
of the step function
are positive. If some of these values are negative, thenwe must re-think what we mean by the area under the graph.
We first introduce the following bit of notation.
-
Let
be a step function on the closed interval
Suppose
is a partition of
such that
on the interval
Define the
weighted average of
relative to
to be the number
defined by
REMARK Notice the similarity between the formula
for a weighted average and the formula for a Riemann sum.Note also that if the interval is a single point,
i.e.,
then the only partition
of the interval consists of the single point
and every weighted average
The next theorem is not a surprise, although its proof
takes some careful thinking.It is simply the assertion that the weighted averages are independent of the choice of partition.
Let
be a step function on the closed interval
Suppose
is a partition of
such that
on the interval
and suppose
is another partition of
such that
on the
interval
Then the weighted average of
relative to
is the same as the weighted average of
relative to
That is,
Suppose first that the partition
is obtained from the partition
by adding one additional point.
Then
and there exists an
between 1 and
such that
- for
we have
-
- For
we have
In other words,
is the only point of
that is not a point
of
and
lies strictly between
and
Because
is constant on the interval
it follows that
- For
-
- For
So,