<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
A series of definitions of terminology used to describe higher-order derivatives, and a formula for the coefficients of a taylor series function.

Let S be a subset of R (or C ), and Let f : S C be a function of a real (or complex) variable. We say that f is continuously differentiable on S 0 if f is differentiable at each point x of S 0 and the function f ' is continuous on S 0 . We say that f C 1 ( S ) if f is continuous on S and continuously differentiable on S 0 . We say that f is 2-times continuously differentiable on S 0 if the first derivative f ' is itself continuously differentiable on S 0 . And, inductively, we say that f is k-times continuously differentiable on S 0 if the k - 1 st derivative of f is itself continuously differentiable on S 0 . We write f ( k ) for the k th derivative of f , and we write f C k ( S ) if f is continuous on S and is k times continuously differentiable on S 0 . Of course, if f C k ( S ) , then all the derivatives f ( j ) , for j k , exist nd are continuous on S 0 . (Why?)

For completeness, we define f ( 0 ) to be f itself, and we say that f C ( S ) if f is continuous on S and has infinitely many continuous derivatives on S 0 ; i.e., all of its derivatives exist and are continuous on S 0 .

As in [link] , we say that f is real-analytic (or complex-analytic ) on S if it is expandable in a Taylor series around each point c S 0

REMARK Keep in mind that the definition above, as applied to functions whose domain S is a nontrivial subset of C , has to do with functions of a complex variable that are continuously differentiable on the set S 0 . We have seen that this is quite different from a function having continuous partial derivatives on S 0 . We will return to partial derivatives at the end of this chapter.

Let S be an open subset of R (or C ).

  1. Suppose W S is a subset of R . Then, for each k 1 , there exists a function in C k ( S ) that is not in C k + 1 ( S ) . That is, C k + 1 ( S ) is a proper subset of C k ( S ) .
  2. If f is real-analytic (or complex-analytic) on S , then f C ( S ) .
  3. There exists a function in C ( R ) that is not real-analytic on R . That is, the set of real-analytic functions on R is a proper subset of the set C ( R ) .

REMARK Suppose S is an open subset of C . It is a famous result from the Theory of Complex Variables that if f is in C 1 ( S ) , then f is necessarily complex analytic on S . We will prove this amazing result in [link] . Part (3) of the theorem shows that the situation is quite different for real-valued functions of a real variable.

For part (1), see the exercise below. Part (2) is immediate from part (c) of [link] . Before finishing the proof of part (3), we present the following lemma:

Let f be the function defined on all of R as follows.

f ( x ) = { 0 x 0 p ( x ) e - 1 / x x n x > 0

where p ( x ) is a fixed polynomial function and n is a fixed nonnegative integer. Then f is continuous at each point x of R .

The assertion of the lemma is clear if x 0 . To see that f is continuous at 0, it will suffice to prove that

lim x 0 + 0 p ( x ) e - 1 / x x n = 0 .

(Why?) But, for x > 0 , we know from part (b) of [link] that e 1 / x > 1 / ( x n + 1 ( n + 1 ) ! ) , implying that e - 1 / x < x n + 1 ( n + 1 ) ! . Hence, for x > 0 ,

| f ( x ) | = | p ( x ) | e - 1 / x x n < ( n + 1 ) ! x | p ( x ) | ,

and this tends to 0 as x approaches 0 from the right, as desired.

Returning to the proof of [link] , we verify part (3) by observing that if f is as in the preceding lemma then f is actually differentiable, and its derivative f ' is a function of the same sort. (Why?) It follows that any such function belongs to C ( R ) . On the other hand, a nontrivial such f cannot be expandable in a Taylor series around 0because of the Identity Theorem. (Take x k = - 1 / k . ) This completes the proof.

  1. Prove part (1) of [link] . Use functions of the form x n sin ( 1 / x ) .
  2. Prove that any function of the form of the f in the lemma above is everywhere differentiable on R , and its derivative has the same form. Conclude that any such function belongs to C ( R ) .
  3. For each positive integer n , define a function f n on the interval ( - 1 , 1 by f n ( x ) = | x | 1 + 1 / n . Prove that each f n is differentiable at every point in ( - 1 , 1 ) , including 0 . Prove also that the sequence { f n } converges uniformly to the function f ( x ) = | x | . (See part (h) of [link] .) Conclude that the uniform limit of differentiable functions of a real variable need not be differentiable.(Again, for functions of a complex variable, the situation is very different. In that case, the uniform limit of differentiable functions is differentiable. See [link] .)

Suppose a < b < c < d are real numbers. Show that there exists a function χ in C ( R ) such that 0 χ ( x ) 1 for all x , χ ( x ) 1 for x [ b , c ] , and χ ( x ) 0 for x ( a , d ) . (If a is close to b and c is close to d , then this function is a C approximation to the step function that is 1 on the interval [ b , c ] and 0 elsewhere.)

  1. Let f be a function like the one in the lemma. Think about the graphs of the functions f ( x - c ) and f ( b - x ) . Construct a C function g that is 0 between b and c and positive everywhere else.
  2. Construct a C function h that is positive between a and d and 0 everywhere else.
  3. Let g and h be as in parts (a) and (b). If j = g + h , show that j is never 0, and write k for the C function k = 1 / j .
  4. Examine the function h k , and show that it is the desired function χ .

Formula for the coefficients of a taylor series function

Let f be expandable in a Taylor series around a point c :

f ( x ) = a n ( x - c ) n .

Then for each n , a n = f ( n ) ( c ) / n ! .

Because each derivative of a Taylor series function is again a Taylor series function, and because the value of a Taylor series function at the point c is equal to its constant term a 0 , we have that a 1 = f ' ( c ) . Computing the derivative of the derivative, we see that 2 a 2 = f ' ' ( c ) = f ( 2 ) ( c ) . Continuing this, i.e., arguing by induction, we find that n ! a n = f ( n ) ( c ) , which proves the theorem.

Questions & Answers

I'm interested in biological psychology and cognitive psychology
Tanya Reply
what does preconceived mean
sammie Reply
physiological Psychology
Nwosu Reply
How can I develope my cognitive domain
Amanyire Reply
why is communication effective
Dakolo Reply
Communication is effective because it allows individuals to share ideas, thoughts, and information with others.
effective communication can lead to improved outcomes in various settings, including personal relationships, business environments, and educational settings. By communicating effectively, individuals can negotiate effectively, solve problems collaboratively, and work towards common goals.
it starts up serve and return practice/assessments.it helps find voice talking therapy also assessments through relaxed conversation.
miss
Every time someone flushes a toilet in the apartment building, the person begins to jumb back automatically after hearing the flush, before the water temperature changes. Identify the types of learning, if it is classical conditioning identify the NS, UCS, CS and CR. If it is operant conditioning, identify the type of consequence positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or punishment
Wekolamo Reply
please i need answer
Wekolamo
because it helps many people around the world to understand how to interact with other people and understand them well, for example at work (job).
Manix Reply
Agreed 👍 There are many parts of our brains and behaviors, we really need to get to know. Blessings for everyone and happy Sunday!
ARC
A child is a member of community not society elucidate ?
JESSY Reply
Isn't practices worldwide, be it psychology, be it science. isn't much just a false belief of control over something the mind cannot truly comprehend?
Simon Reply
compare and contrast skinner's perspective on personality development on freud
namakula Reply
Skinner skipped the whole unconscious phenomenon and rather emphasized on classical conditioning
war
explain how nature and nurture affect the development and later the productivity of an individual.
Amesalu Reply
nature is an hereditary factor while nurture is an environmental factor which constitute an individual personality. so if an individual's parent has a deviant behavior and was also brought up in an deviant environment, observation of the behavior and the inborn trait we make the individual deviant.
Samuel
I am taking this course because I am hoping that I could somehow learn more about my chosen field of interest and due to the fact that being a PsyD really ignites my passion as an individual the more I hope to learn about developing and literally explore the complexity of my critical thinking skills
Zyryn Reply
good👍
Jonathan
and having a good philosophy of the world is like a sandwich and a peanut butter 👍
Jonathan
generally amnesi how long yrs memory loss
Kelu Reply
interpersonal relationships
Abdulfatai Reply
What would be the best educational aid(s) for gifted kids/savants?
Heidi Reply
treat them normal, if they want help then give them. that will make everyone happy
Saurabh
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Analysis of functions of a single variable. OpenStax CNX. Dec 11, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11249/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask