<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
We show now that contains elements other than the rational numbers in Of course this holds for any complete ordered field. The next theorem makes this quite explicit.
If is a positive real number, then there exists a positive real number such that That is, every positive real number has a positive square root in Moreover, there is only one positive square root of
Let be the set of positive real numbers for which Then is nonempty Indeed, If then 1 is in because And, if then itself is in , because
Also, is bounded above. In fact, the number is an upper bound of Indeed, arguing by contradiction, suppose there were a in such that Then
which is a contradiction. Therefore, is an upper bound of and so is bounded above.
Now let We wish to show that We show first that and then we will show that It will then follow from the tricotomy law that We prove both these inequalities by contradiction.
So, assume first that and write for the positive number Let be the positive number and, using Theorem 1.5, choose a such that Then and So,
which is a contradiction. Therefore is not greater than
Now we show that is not less than Again, arguing by contradiction, suppose it is,and let be the positive number Choose a positive number that is less than and also less than Let Then is not in whence so that we must have
which again is a contradiction.
This completes the proof that i.e., that has a positive square root.
Finally, if were another positive number for which we show that by ruling out the other two cases: and For instance, if then we would have that giving that
implying that and this is a contradiction.
If is a positive real number, then the symbol will denote the unique positive number for which Of course, denotes the number 0.
REMARK Part (c) of [link] shows that the field contains no number whose square is 2, and [link] shows that the field does contain a number whose square is 2. We have therefore “proved” that the real numbers is a largerset than the rational numbers. It may come as a surprise to learn that we only now have beenable to prove that. Look back through the chapter to be sure. It follows also that itself is not a complete ordered field. If it were, it would be isomorphic to by Theorem 1.2, so that it would have to contain a square root of 2, which it does not.
A real number that is not a rational number, i.e., is not an element of the subset of is called an irrational number.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?