# 1.2 The rational numbers

 Page 1 / 1
Rational numbers are thought of as quotients k/n of integers. Fields are defined, and examples of fields are given.

Next, we discuss the set $Q$ of rational numbers, which we ordinarily think of as quotients $k/n$ of integers. Of course, we do not allow the “second” element $n$ of the quotient $k/n$ to be 0. Also, we must remember that there isn't a 1-1 correspondence between the set $Q$ of all rational numbers and the set of all such quotients $k/n.$ Indeed, the two distinct quotients $2/3$ and $6/9$ represent the same rational number. To be precise, the set $Q$ is a collection of equivalence classes of ordered pairs $\left(k,n\right)$ of integers, for which the second component of the pair is not 0. The equivalence relation among these ordered pairs is this:

$\left(k,n\right)\equiv \left({k}^{\text{'}},{n}^{\text{'}}\right)\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\text{if}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}k×{n}^{\text{'}}=n×{k}^{\text{'}}.$

We will not dwell on this possibly subtle definition, but will rather accept the usual understanding of the rational numbers and their arithmetic properties. In particular, we will represent them as quotients rather than as ordered pairs, and, if $r$ is a rational number, we will write $r=k/n,$ instead of writing $r$ as the equivalence class containing the ordered pair $\left(k,n\right).$ As usual, we refer to the first integer in the quotient $k/n$ as the numerator and the second (nonzero) integer in the quotient $k/n$ as the denominator of the quotient. The familiar definitions of sum and product for rational numbers are these:

$\frac{k}{n}+\frac{{k}^{\text{'}}}{{n}^{\text{'}}}=\frac{k{n}^{\text{'}}+n{k}^{\text{'}}}{n{n}^{\text{'}}}$

and

$\frac{k}{n}×\frac{{k}^{\text{'}}}{{n}^{\text{'}}}=\frac{k{k}^{\text{'}}}{n{n}^{\text{'}}}.$

Addition and multiplication of rational numbers satisfy the three basic algebraic relations of commutativity, associativity and distributivity stated earlier.

We note that the integers $Z$ can be identified in an obvious way as a subset of the rational numbers $Q.$ Indeed, we identify the integer $k$ with the quotient $k/1.$ In this way, we note that $Q$ contains the two numbers $0\equiv 0/1$ and $1\equiv 1/1.$ Notice that any other quotient $k/n$ that is equivalent to $0/1$ must satisfy $k=0,$ and any other quotient $k/n$ that is equivalent to $1/1$ must satisfy $k=n.$ Remember, $k/n\equiv {k}^{\text{'}}/{n}^{\text{'}}$ if and only if $k{n}^{\text{'}}={k}^{\text{'}}n.$

The set $Q$ has an additional property not shared by the set of integers $Z.$ It is this: For each nonzero element $r\in Q,$ there exists an element ${r}^{\text{'}}\in Q$ for which $r×{r}^{\text{'}}=1.$ Indeed, if $r=k/n\ne 0,$ then $k\ne 0,$ and we may define ${r}^{\text{'}}=n/k.$ Consequently, the set $Q$ of all rational numbers is what is known in mathematics as a field.

A field is a nonempty set $F$ on which there are defined two binary operations, addition ( $+$ ) and multiplication ( $×$ ), such that the following six axioms hold:

1. Both addition and multiplication are commutative and associative.
2. Multiplication is distributive over addition; i.e.,
$x×\left(y+z\right)=x×y+x×z$
for all $x,y,z\in F.$
3. There exists an element in $F,$ which we will denote by $0,$ that is an identity for addition; i.e., $x+0=x$ for all $x\in F.$
4. There exists a nonzero element in $F,$ which we will denote by $1,$ that is an identity for multiplication; i.e., $x×1=x$ for all $x\in F.$
5. If $x\in F,$ then there exists a unique element $y\in F$ such that $x+y=0.$ This element $y$ is called the additive inverse of $x$ and is denoted by $-x.$
6. If $x\in F$ and $x\ne 0,$ then there exists a unique element $y\in F$ such that $x×y=1.$ This element $y$ is called the multiplicative inverse of $x$ and is denoted by ${x}^{-1}.$

REMARK. There are many examples of fields. (See [link] .) They all share certain arithmetic properties, which can be derived from the axioms above. If $x$ is an element of a field $F,$ then according to one of the axioms above, we have that $1×x=x.$ (Note that this “1” is the multiplicative identity of the field $F$ and not the natural number 1.) However, it is tempting to write $x+x=2×x$ in the field $F.$ The “2” here is not à priori an element of $F,$ so that the equation $x+x=2×x$ is not really justified. This is an example of a situation where a careful recursive definition can be useful.

If $x$ is an element of a field $F,$ define inductively elements $n·x\equiv nx$ of $F$ by $1·x=x,$ and, if $k·x$ is defined, set $\left(k+1\right)·x=x+k·x.$ The set $S$ of all natural numbers $n$ for which $n·x$ is defined is therefore, by the axiom of mathematical induction, all of $N.$

Usually we will write $nx$ instead of $n·x.$ Of course, $nx$ is just the element of $F$ obtained by adding $x$ to itself $n$ times: $nx=x+x+x+...+x.$

1. Justify for yourself that the set $Q$ of all rational numbers is a field.That is, carefully verify that all six of the axioms hold.
2. Let ${F}_{7}$ denote the seven elements $\left\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6\right\}.$ Define addition and multiplication on ${F}_{7}$ as ordinary addition and multiplication mod 7. Prove that ${F}_{7}$ is a field. (You may assume that axioms (1) and (2) hold.Check only conditions (3)–(6).) Show in addition that $7x=0$ for every $x\in {F}_{7}.$
3. Let ${F}_{9}$ denote the set consisting of the nine elements $\left\{0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8\right\}.$ Define addition and multiplication on ${F}_{9}$ to be ordinary addition and multiplication mod 9. Show that ${F}_{9}$ is not a field. Which of the axioms fail to hold?
4. Show that the set $N$ of natural numbers is not a field. Which of the field axioms fail to hold?Show that the set $Z$ of all integers is not a field. Which of the field axioms fail to hold?

Let $F$ be any field. Verify that the following arithmetic properties hold in $F.$

1. $0×x=0$ for all $x\in F.$ HINT: Use the distributive law and the fact that $0=0+0.$
2. If $x$ and $y$ are nonzero elements of $F,$ then $x×y$ is nonzero. And, the multiplicative inverse of $x×y$ satisfies ${\left(x×y\right)}^{-1}={x}^{-1}×{y}^{-1}.$
3. $\left(-1\right)×x=\left(-x\right)$ for all $x\in F.$
4. $\left(-x\right)×\left(-y\right)=x×y$ for all $x,y\in F.$
5. $x×x-y×y=\left(x-y\right)×\left(x+y\right).$
6. $\left(x+y\right)×\left(x+y\right)=x×x+2·x×y+y×y.$

Let $F$ be a field, and let $x$ be a nonzero element of $F.$

For each natural number $n,$ we define inductively an element ${x}^{n}$ in $F$ as follows: ${x}^{1}=x,$ and, if ${x}^{k}$ is defined, set ${x}^{k+1}=x×{x}^{k}.$ Of course, ${x}^{n}$ is just the product of $n$ $x$ 's.

Define ${x}^{0}$ to be $1.$

For each natural number $n,$ define ${x}^{-n}$ to be the multiplicative inverse ${\left({x}^{n}\right)}^{-1}$ of the element ${x}^{n}.$

Finally, we define ${0}^{m}$ to be 0 for every positive integer $m,$ and we leave ${0}^{-n}$ and ${0}^{0}$ undefined.

We have therefore defined ${x}^{m}$ for every nonzero $x$ and every integer $m\in Z.$

Let $F$ be a field. Derive the following laws of exponents:

1. ${x}^{n+m}={x}^{n}×{x}^{m}$ for all nonzero elements $x\in F$ and all integers $n$ and $m.$ HINT: Fix $x\in F$ and $m\in Z$ and use induction to derive this law for all natural numbers $n.$ Then use the fact that in any field ${\left(x×y\right)}^{-1}={x}^{-1}×{y}^{-1}.$
2. ${x}^{n×m}={\left({x}^{m}\right)}^{n}$ for all nonzero $x\in F$ and all $n,m\in Z.$
3. ${\left(x×y\right)}^{n}={x}^{n}×{y}^{n}$ for all nonzero $x,y\in F$ and all $n\in Z.$

From now on, we will indicate multiplication in a field by juxtaposition; i.e., $x×y$ will be denoted simply as $xy.$ Also, we will use the standard fractional notation to indicate multiplicative inverses. For instance,

$x{y}^{-1}=x\frac{1}{y}=\frac{x}{y}.$

#### Questions & Answers

Is there any normative that regulates the use of silver nanoparticles?
Damian Reply
what king of growth are you checking .?
Renato
What fields keep nano created devices from performing or assimulating ? Magnetic fields ? Are do they assimilate ?
Stoney Reply
why we need to study biomolecules, molecular biology in nanotechnology?
Adin Reply
?
Kyle
yes I'm doing my masters in nanotechnology, we are being studying all these domains as well..
Adin
why?
Adin
what school?
Kyle
biomolecules are e building blocks of every organics and inorganic materials.
Joe
anyone know any internet site where one can find nanotechnology papers?
Damian Reply
research.net
kanaga
sciencedirect big data base
Ernesto
Introduction about quantum dots in nanotechnology
Praveena Reply
what does nano mean?
Anassong Reply
nano basically means 10^(-9). nanometer is a unit to measure length.
Bharti
do you think it's worthwhile in the long term to study the effects and possibilities of nanotechnology on viral treatment?
Damian Reply
absolutely yes
Daniel
how to know photocatalytic properties of tio2 nanoparticles...what to do now
Akash Reply
it is a goid question and i want to know the answer as well
Maciej
characteristics of micro business
Abigail
for teaching engĺish at school how nano technology help us
Anassong
Do somebody tell me a best nano engineering book for beginners?
s. Reply
there is no specific books for beginners but there is book called principle of nanotechnology
NANO
what is fullerene does it is used to make bukky balls
Devang Reply
are you nano engineer ?
s.
fullerene is a bucky ball aka Carbon 60 molecule. It was name by the architect Fuller. He design the geodesic dome. it resembles a soccer ball.
Tarell
what is the actual application of fullerenes nowadays?
Damian
That is a great question Damian. best way to answer that question is to Google it. there are hundreds of applications for buck minister fullerenes, from medical to aerospace. you can also find plenty of research papers that will give you great detail on the potential applications of fullerenes.
Tarell
what is the Synthesis, properties,and applications of carbon nano chemistry
Abhijith Reply
Mostly, they use nano carbon for electronics and for materials to be strengthened.
Virgil
is Bucky paper clear?
CYNTHIA
carbon nanotubes has various application in fuel cells membrane, current research on cancer drug,and in electronics MEMS and NEMS etc
NANO
so some one know about replacing silicon atom with phosphorous in semiconductors device?
s. Reply
Yeah, it is a pain to say the least. You basically have to heat the substarte up to around 1000 degrees celcius then pass phosphene gas over top of it, which is explosive and toxic by the way, under very low pressure.
Harper
Do you know which machine is used to that process?
s.
how to fabricate graphene ink ?
SUYASH Reply
for screen printed electrodes ?
SUYASH
What is lattice structure?
s. Reply
of graphene you mean?
Ebrahim
or in general
Ebrahim
in general
s.
Graphene has a hexagonal structure
tahir
On having this app for quite a bit time, Haven't realised there's a chat room in it.
Cied
what is biological synthesis of nanoparticles
Sanket Reply
in a comparison of the stages of meiosis to the stage of mitosis, which stages are unique to meiosis and which stages have the same event in botg meiosis and mitosis
Leah Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

### Read also:

#### Get the best Algebra and trigonometry course in your pocket!

Source:  OpenStax, Analysis of functions of a single variable. OpenStax CNX. Dec 11, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11249/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Analysis of functions of a single variable' conversation and receive update notifications?     By   By  