<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

The President needs help!

—Louis Brownlow, 1937

In holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

—Dwight Eisenhower, January 17, 1961

The shock of sputnik

As has been recounted by several of the principal participants, See, e.g., David Z. Beckler, “The Precarious Life of Science in the White House,” in Gerald Holton and William A. Blanpied eds., Science and Its Public: The Changing Relationship (Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1976), 115-34. an October 15, 1957, meeting with the Scientific Advisory Committee to the Office of Defense Mobilization had been on President Eisenhower’s calendar for weeks when the Soviet Union launched Sputnik on October 4. Within days, Congress, the press, and the public were raising serious questions about the adequacy of U.S. science, technology and education. According to Donald Hornig, later science advisor to President Lyndon Johnson, “the degree to which the press and public reacted was totally unexpected and showed an unanticipated understanding of the relation between scientific and technological stature and world power.” Donald Hornig, “The President’s Need for Science Advice: Past and Future,” in William T. Golden ed., Science Advice to the President (New York: Pergamon Press, 1980), 43.

“Our name was mud,” recounted I.I. Rabi, Nobel Laureate in Physics at Columbia University and part-time Chairman of SAC/ODM. I.I. Rabi, “The President and his Scientific Advisers” in Golden, op. cit ., 22. “I advised him [the president] in the presence of the committee that what he needed was a man whom he liked, who would be available full time to work with him right in his office, to help by clarifying the scientific and technological aspects of the decisions which must be made from time to time. He would be part of his brain, so to speak. President Eisenhower readily agreed.” James R. Killian carried Rabi’s proposal one step further by urging “that there be a strong Science Advisory Committee reporting directly to the President who could back up his Adviser.” James Killian, “The Origins and Uses of a Scientific Presence in the White House,” in Golden, op. cit ., 29.

Danish Nobel Laureate Niels Bohr accepting the Atoms for Peace Award from President Dwight Eisenhower ca. 1958. Left to right, Lewis Strauss, Arthur Compton, Bohr, Eisenhower, and James Killlian, Jr. Courtesy of the Niels Bohr Archives, AIP Segre Visual Archives.

Eisenhower was quick to react. In a November 7 nationwide broadcast, he announced Killian’s appointment as his full-time Special Assistant for Science and Technology—a position that became commonly known as the Presidential Science Advisor. On November 27, he announced the reconstitution of SAC/ODM and its re-designation as the President’s Science Advisory Committee (PSAC), consisting solely of non-government scientists and chaired by the president and his science advisor. With the creation of PSAC, the scientific community received what it had long sought: special access to the president.

Questions & Answers

what is biology
Hajah Reply
the study of living organisms and their interactions with one another and their environments
AI-Robot
what is biology
Victoria Reply
HOW CAN MAN ORGAN FUNCTION
Alfred Reply
the diagram of the digestive system
Assiatu Reply
allimentary cannel
Ogenrwot
How does twins formed
William Reply
They formed in two ways first when one sperm and one egg are splited by mitosis or two sperm and two eggs join together
Oluwatobi
what is genetics
Josephine Reply
Genetics is the study of heredity
Misack
how does twins formed?
Misack
What is manual
Hassan Reply
discuss biological phenomenon and provide pieces of evidence to show that it was responsible for the formation of eukaryotic organelles
Joseph Reply
what is biology
Yousuf Reply
the study of living organisms and their interactions with one another and their environment.
Wine
discuss the biological phenomenon and provide pieces of evidence to show that it was responsible for the formation of eukaryotic organelles in an essay form
Joseph Reply
what is the blood cells
Shaker Reply
list any five characteristics of the blood cells
Shaker
lack electricity and its more savely than electronic microscope because its naturally by using of light
Abdullahi Reply
advantage of electronic microscope is easily and clearly while disadvantage is dangerous because its electronic. advantage of light microscope is savely and naturally by sun while disadvantage is not easily,means its not sharp and not clear
Abdullahi
cell theory state that every organisms composed of one or more cell,cell is the basic unit of life
Abdullahi
is like gone fail us
DENG
cells is the basic structure and functions of all living things
Ramadan
What is classification
ISCONT Reply
is organisms that are similar into groups called tara
Yamosa
in what situation (s) would be the use of a scanning electron microscope be ideal and why?
Kenna Reply
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is ideal for situations requiring high-resolution imaging of surfaces. It is commonly used in materials science, biology, and geology to examine the topography and composition of samples at a nanoscale level. SEM is particularly useful for studying fine details,
Hilary
cell is the building block of life.
Condoleezza Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, A history of federal science policy from the new deal to the present. OpenStax CNX. Jun 26, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11210/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'A history of federal science policy from the new deal to the present' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask