<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
  • The specific hour requirements in the internship pertaining to working with IEP meetings, special education teachers, and ELL teachers were dropped and were replaced by evidence of competency and understanding in those areas;
  • The request that interns be allowed to be mentored by out-of-state principals was granted;
  • The experience requirement for principals serving as mentors was reduced from four years to three years; and
  • In an item requested by some universities, but addressed in great detail in the ICPEA letter, the percentage of courses that could be taught by adjunct professors was increased from one-third to no more than 80% of the total.

The number of years of teaching experience required for the endorsement was four years, and the number of candidates that a principal may mentor in a 12 month period was left at two. While the ISBE staff indicated in its memorandum accompanying the rules that out-of-state candidates should be required to meet the same requirements as participants in Illinois programs, this still did not appear specifically in the rules.

On December 16, 2010, the president of ICPEA testified in front of the Illinois State Board of Education. In his testimony, he thanked the ISBE staff for the changes made in the rules, and still requested that the board consider increasing the number of candidates a principal may mentor to more than two and allowing a system which would enable candidates to begin programs earlier than after four years of teaching. He also again urged specificity regarding the reciprocity issue.

The final push

During the time between the Illinois State Board of Education meeting December of 2010 and the final meeting of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) meeting in the second week of April 2011, ICPEA members and member institutions continued to call legislators, write letters, etc. Over 150 letters were received by the ISBE and JCAR members during this time period. In the March 3, 2011 meeting of the ICPEA, the president was again directed by the membership to send another letter to both ISBE and JCAR regarding remaining concerns of the membership. This letter was sent on March 4, 2011. A final letter was sent on April 2, 2011, just days before the JCAR meeting in which the final rules were to be approved. During the final week before the JCAR vote, a small group of JCAR members were able to meet with key legislative members of the JCAR committee and were able to address the group’s remaining concerns one more time. As a result of these final efforts, JCAR directed the ISBE to revise the proposed rules pertaining to years of experience before a candidate could enter an administrative program. The ISBE staff was told to develop rules in this area which would enable candidates to be eligible for certification after four years of teaching experience. The ISBE staff was also instructed to address the out-of-state issue and to propose rules which would require out-of-state universities to comply with the new Illinois requirements.


Many of the higher education institutions in Illinois which prepare principal candidates are in direct competition with one another for students. Prior to the push for reform by ISBE and IBHE, it was not uncommon for some institutions to creatively look for ways to “poach” students from other institutions. However, as a result of what the ICPEA saw as a common threat, the member institutions put aside their differences and began working together more closely than ever before. Public and private institutions teamed up to first work together for reform, along with the major state agencies, and subsequently to fight against backtracking on agreements and unilateral changes in the rules which ICPEA members felt had been agreed upon during an extensive task force process. Personal and institutional relationships were clearly strengthened during the entire reform process, and the ICPEA emerged as an even stronger institution than before. Members are now willing and anxious to engage in collaborative ventures with their professional colleagues across the state. There is little doubt among the ICPEA membership that superintendent preparation programs are next on the docket of ISBE and IBHE. We have learned that we must be eternally vigilant in our dealings with these state agencies. Rather than thinking about “your turf” or “my turf,” we now tend to think in terms of “our turf.”


  • Commission on School Leader Preparation in Illinois Colleges and Universities. (2006). School leader preparation: A blueprint for change. Springfield, IL: Illinois Board of Higher Education.
  • Fry, B., Botttoms, G.&O’Neill, K. (2005). The principal internship: How can we get it right? Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board. Retrieved August 12, 2009 from (External Link)
  • Hackmann, D.&Wanat, C. (2007). Licensing principals: Iowa’s preparation reform initiative. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2 (3), 1-36.
  • Illinois Board of Higher Education and Illinois State Board of Education. (2009). Newly defined principal preparation. Springfield, IL: Illinois Board of Higher Education and Illinois State Board of Education, pp.1-46. Retrieved August 9, 2009 from (External Link)
  • Illinois Principals Association. (2009). Distinguished principals program. Springfield, IL: Illinois Principals Association. Retrieved August 9, 2009 from (External Link) .
  • Illinois State Board of Education. (2008). General administrative endorsements entitled by institution. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Board of Education.
  • Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders: The education schools project. Princeton, NJ: The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
  • Tozer, S. (2008). Report to the Illinois general assembly. Illinois School Leader Task Force. Springfield, IL: Office of the Governor; Illinois State Board of Education; Illinois Board of Higher Education; and Center for the Study of Education Policy at Illinois State University.
  • University of South Alabama (2009). Instructional leadership for all Alabama schools. Alabama Instructional Leadership University Redesign. Mobile, AL, pp. 1-7.

Questions & Answers

how can chip be made from sand
Eke Reply
is this allso about nanoscale material
are nano particles real
Missy Reply
Hello, if I study Physics teacher in bachelor, can I study Nanotechnology in master?
Lale Reply
no can't
where is the latest information on a no technology how can I find it
where we get a research paper on Nano chemistry....?
Maira Reply
nanopartical of organic/inorganic / physical chemistry , pdf / thesis / review
what are the products of Nano chemistry?
Maira Reply
There are lots of products of nano chemistry... Like nano coatings.....carbon fiber.. And lots of others..
Even nanotechnology is pretty much all about chemistry... Its the chemistry on quantum or atomic level
no nanotechnology is also a part of physics and maths it requires angle formulas and some pressure regarding concepts
Preparation and Applications of Nanomaterial for Drug Delivery
Hafiz Reply
Application of nanotechnology in medicine
has a lot of application modern world
what is variations in raman spectra for nanomaterials
Jyoti Reply
ya I also want to know the raman spectra
I only see partial conversation and what's the question here!
Crow Reply
what about nanotechnology for water purification
RAW Reply
please someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think one can use nanoparticles, specially silver nanoparticles for water treatment.
yes that's correct
I think
Nasa has use it in the 60's, copper as water purification in the moon travel.
nanocopper obvius
what is the stm
Brian Reply
is there industrial application of fullrenes. What is the method to prepare fullrene on large scale.?
industrial application...? mmm I think on the medical side as drug carrier, but you should go deeper on your research, I may be wrong
How we are making nano material?
what is a peer
What is meant by 'nano scale'?
What is STMs full form?
scanning tunneling microscope
how nano science is used for hydrophobicity
Do u think that Graphene and Fullrene fiber can be used to make Air Plane body structure the lightest and strongest. Rafiq
what is differents between GO and RGO?
what is simplest way to understand the applications of nano robots used to detect the cancer affected cell of human body.? How this robot is carried to required site of body cell.? what will be the carrier material and how can be detected that correct delivery of drug is done Rafiq
analytical skills graphene is prepared to kill any type viruses .
Any one who tell me about Preparation and application of Nanomaterial for drug Delivery
what is Nano technology ?
Bob Reply
write examples of Nano molecule?
The nanotechnology is as new science, to scale nanometric
nanotechnology is the study, desing, synthesis, manipulation and application of materials and functional systems through control of matter at nanoscale
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now

Source:  OpenStax, Education leadership review special issue: portland conference, volume 12, number 3 (october 2011). OpenStax CNX. Oct 17, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11362/1.5
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Education leadership review special issue: portland conference, volume 12, number 3 (october 2011)' conversation and receive update notifications?