<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

If we apply a science paradigm, a digital humanities scholar could be compared to an experimental physicist, as someone who designs processes and instruments to find the answers to their research questions.   But the most striking difference between the experimental humanist and the experimental physicist lies in the fate of these processes and instruments after the article on the findings they enabled has been written: they are transcended, perhaps licensed to another for further use, perhaps simply discarded.  Why are we so different about our electronic data?  Would it be enough for humanistic scholars as well to draw their conclusions and let it go either to be developed by someone else or to mildew?  Or is there something inherently different in the nature of our data, that we should be so attached to its survival?  For example, we expect to receive credit for scholarly editions—why should we not receive it for digital scholarly editions?  Are the data collections created by humanists inherently more accessible and open than an experimental physicist’s algorithm or shade-tree spectroscope?  Are we not just creating slaves and drones, tools to meet our need, but instead, as McGann puts it elsewhere, contributing to a “Global Library,” something that invites users across time and space to access the information within and use it to answer their own questions and undertake their own experiments?

If so, then there is another pachyderm in the parlor to address, which is the conundrum of reuse.  We all know the excitement of the digital project, the feeling that comes as the tide of understanding begins to break over us with each new iteration of the interface or each refinement of the search terms.  The day we send the URL around to our scholarly colleagues is a great day, and we bask in the congratulations they return to us.  But then what?  Usage studies confirm that after our close friends and colleagues have an initial trawl of our project data, rate of reuse of digital projects is actually disappointingly low.  Is it that the act of organizing a digital collection or a dataset is always already too powerful an act of editorialism, thereby marking that intellectual territory as no longer open for original investigation?  Is it that in a world where the size of the ocean of analog data means that the mere choice to digitize a manuscript or a collection leaves a watermark that reads “noli me tangere”?  Or is it that we simply don't have the infrastructure to communicate about works produced in this manner?  Stripped of publishers’ lists, of their marketing channels and peer review and quality control systems, are we failing the next generation of scholars by creating too many resources in the wild?

Culture change is always the most difficult part of any corporate project, and in this case we have neither the profit motive nor the bounded scale of operations to hold our community together while we try to change minds not just about the value of digital editions, but of scholarly editions of all kinds. Generations of big projects, Europe’s DARIAH and Project Bamboo not excepted, seem to struggle with the notion that the right tools will turn the scholarly Sauls to Pauls, and bring them in their droves into the digital fold. Others put forward the notion that generational change will bring us along regardless of our efforts for or against changes in modes of scholarly communication. But younger scholars have a long road of apprenticeship to endure before they can call the tune rather than merely dance, and many of them will be well and truly institutionalized by the time they can take a bold stance on what they produce from their research. The elephant in the room may therefore in fact be an iceberg, with many layers of analog problems filling the depth beneath the digital ones we tend to focus on. Change can come, and organizations like the DHO and the Trinity Long Room Hub are well placed to facilitate changing attitudes from above and below. If, to paraphrase another old bit of rhetoric, we can get beyond the entrenched attitudes of the stonemasons and the bricklayers, perhaps we will all be able to see that what we are building is a cathedral.

Notes

1 .   http://web.me.com/xcia0069/nof.html . Thanks to Alastair Dunning of JISC and to Mark Hedges, who graciously shared their summary of the data with us. 2 (External Link) . 3 Alastair  Dunning, “The Tasks of the AHDS: Ten Years On.” Ariadne 48 (July 2006). (External Link) . 4 (External Link) . 5 Our thanks to Lou Bernard and Laurent Romary for the help with information about TGE Adonis.

Questions & Answers

what is math number
Tric Reply
x-2y+3z=-3 2x-y+z=7 -x+3y-z=6
Sidiki Reply
Need help solving this problem (2/7)^-2
Simone Reply
x+2y-z=7
Sidiki
what is the coefficient of -4×
Mehri Reply
-1
Shedrak
the operation * is x * y =x + y/ 1+(x × y) show if the operation is commutative if x × y is not equal to -1
Alfred Reply
An investment account was opened with an initial deposit of $9,600 and earns 7.4% interest, compounded continuously. How much will the account be worth after 15 years?
Kala Reply
lim x to infinity e^1-e^-1/log(1+x)
given eccentricity and a point find the equiation
Moses Reply
12, 17, 22.... 25th term
Alexandra Reply
12, 17, 22.... 25th term
Akash
College algebra is really hard?
Shirleen Reply
Absolutely, for me. My problems with math started in First grade...involving a nun Sister Anastasia, bad vision, talking & getting expelled from Catholic school. When it comes to math I just can't focus and all I can hear is our family silverware banging and clanging on the pink Formica table.
Carole
I'm 13 and I understand it great
AJ
I am 1 year old but I can do it! 1+1=2 proof very hard for me though.
Atone
hi
Adu
Not really they are just easy concepts which can be understood if you have great basics. I am 14 I understood them easily.
Vedant
find the 15th term of the geometric sequince whose first is 18 and last term of 387
Jerwin Reply
I know this work
salma
The given of f(x=x-2. then what is the value of this f(3) 5f(x+1)
virgelyn Reply
hmm well what is the answer
Abhi
If f(x) = x-2 then, f(3) when 5f(x+1) 5((3-2)+1) 5(1+1) 5(2) 10
Augustine
how do they get the third part x = (32)5/4
kinnecy Reply
make 5/4 into a mixed number, make that a decimal, and then multiply 32 by the decimal 5/4 turns out to be
AJ
how
Sheref
can someone help me with some logarithmic and exponential equations.
Jeffrey Reply
sure. what is your question?
ninjadapaul
20/(×-6^2)
Salomon
okay, so you have 6 raised to the power of 2. what is that part of your answer
ninjadapaul
I don't understand what the A with approx sign and the boxed x mean
ninjadapaul
it think it's written 20/(X-6)^2 so it's 20 divided by X-6 squared
Salomon
I'm not sure why it wrote it the other way
Salomon
I got X =-6
Salomon
ok. so take the square root of both sides, now you have plus or minus the square root of 20= x-6
ninjadapaul
oops. ignore that.
ninjadapaul
so you not have an equal sign anywhere in the original equation?
ninjadapaul
hmm
Abhi
is it a question of log
Abhi
🤔.
Abhi
I rally confuse this number And equations too I need exactly help
salma
But this is not salma it's Faiza live in lousvile Ky I garbage this so I am going collage with JCTC that the of the collage thank you my friends
salma
Commplementary angles
Idrissa Reply
hello
Sherica
im all ears I need to learn
Sherica
right! what he said ⤴⤴⤴
Tamia
hii
Uday
hi
salma
hi
Ayuba
Hello
opoku
hi
Ali
greetings from Iran
Ali
salut. from Algeria
Bach
hi
Nharnhar
A soccer field is a rectangle 130 meters wide and 110 meters long. The coach asks players to run from one corner to the other corner diagonally across. What is that distance, to the nearest tenths place.
Kimberly Reply
Jeannette has $5 and $10 bills in her wallet. The number of fives is three more than six times the number of tens. Let t represent the number of tens. Write an expression for the number of fives.
August Reply
What is the expressiin for seven less than four times the number of nickels
Leonardo Reply
How do i figure this problem out.
how do you translate this in Algebraic Expressions
linda Reply
why surface tension is zero at critical temperature
Shanjida
I think if critical temperature denote high temperature then a liquid stats boils that time the water stats to evaporate so some moles of h2o to up and due to high temp the bonding break they have low density so it can be a reason
s.
Need to simplify the expresin. 3/7 (x+y)-1/7 (x-1)=
Crystal Reply
. After 3 months on a diet, Lisa had lost 12% of her original weight. She lost 21 pounds. What was Lisa's original weight?
Chris Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get the best Algebra and trigonometry course in your pocket!





Source:  OpenStax, Online humanities scholarship: the shape of things to come. OpenStax CNX. May 08, 2010 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11199/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Online humanities scholarship: the shape of things to come' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask