<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
This collection reviews fundamental concepts underlying the use of concise models for signal processing. Topics are presented from a geometric perspective and include low-dimensional linear, sparse, and manifold-based signal models, approximation, compression, dimensionality reduction, and Compressed Sensing.

We now survey some common and important models in signal processing, each of which involves some notion of conciseness tothe signal structure. We see in each case that this conciseness gives rise to a low-dimensional geometry within the ambient signalspace.

Linear models

Some of the simplest models in signal processing correspond to linear subspaces of the ambient signal space. Bandlimited signals are one such example. Supposing, for example,that a 2 π -periodic signal f has Fourier transform F ( ω ) = 0 for | ω | > B , the Shannon/Nyquist sampling theorem  [link] states that such signals can be reconstructed from 2 B samples. Because the space of B -bandlimited signals is closed under addition and scalar multiplication, it follows that the set of such signals forms a 2 B -dimensional linear subspace of L 2 ( [ 0 , 2 π ) ) .

Linear signal models also appear in cases where a model dictates a linear constraint on a signal. Considering a discrete length- N signal x , for example, such a constraint can be written in matrix form as

A x = 0
for some M × N matrix A . Signals obeying such a model are constrained to live in N ( A ) (again, obviously, a linear subspace of R N ).

A very similar class of models concerns signals living in an affine space, which can be represented for a discrete signal using

A x = y .
The class of such x lives in a shifted nullspace x ^ + N ( A ) , where x ^ is any solution to the equation A x ^ = y .

Revisiting the dictionary setting (see Signal Dictionaries and Representations ), one last important linear model arises in cases where we select K specific elements from the dictionary Ψ and then construct signals using linear combinations of only these K elements; in this case the set of possible signals forms a K -dimensional hyperplane in the ambient signal space (see [link] (a)).

Simple models for signals in R 2 . (a) The linear space spanned by one element of the dictionary Ψ . The bold vectors denote the elements of the dictionary, while the dashed line (plus the corresponding dictionary element) denotes the subspace spanned by that dictionary element. (b) The nonlinear set of 1-sparse signals that can be built using Ψ . (c) A manifold M .

For example, we may construct low-frequency signals using combinations of only the lowest frequency sinusoids from theFourier dictionary. Similar subsets may be chosen from the wavelet dictionary; in particular, one may choose only elements that spana particular scaling space V j . As we have mentioned previously, harmonic dictionaries such as sinusoids and wavelets arewell-suited to representing smooth Lipschitz smoothness We say a continuous-time function of D variables has smoothness of order H > 0 , where H = r + ν , r is an integer, and ν ( 0 , 1 ] , if the following criteria are met [link] , [link] :

  • All iterated partial derivatives with respect to the D directions up to order r exist and are continuous.
  • All such partial derivatives of order r satisfy a Lipschitz condition of order ν (also known as a Hölder condition).(A function d Lip ( ν ) if | d ( t 1 + t 2 ) - d ( t 1 ) | C t 2 ν for all D -dimensional vectors t 1 , t 2 .)
We will sometimes consider the space of smooth functions whose partial derivatives up to order r are bounded by some constant Ω . With somewhat nonstandard notation, we denote the space of such bounded functions with bounded partial derivatives by C H , where this notation carries an implicit dependence on Ω . Observe that r = H - 1 , where · denotes rounding up. Also, when H is an integer C H includes as a subset the space traditionally denoted by the notation “ C H ” (the class of functions that have H = r + 1 continuous partial derivatives).
signals. This can be seen in the decay of their transform coefficients. For example, we canrelate the smoothness of a continuous 1-D function f to the decay of its Fourier coefficients F ( ω ) ; in particular, if | F ( ω ) | ( 1 + | ω | H ) d ω < , then f C H [link] . In order to satisfy | F ( ω ) | ( 1 + | ω | H ) d ω < , a signal must have a sufficiently fast decay of the Fourier transform coefficients | F ( ω ) | as ω grows. Wavelet coefficients exhibit a similar decay for smooth signals:supposing f C H and the wavelet basis function has at least H vanishing moments, then as the scale j , the magnitudes of the wavelet coefficients decayas 2 - j ( H + 1 / 2 ) [link] . (Recall that f C H implies f is well-approximated by a polynomial, and so due the vanishing moments this polynomial will have zero contribution tothe wavelet coefficients.)

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Concise signal models. OpenStax CNX. Sep 14, 2009 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10635/1.4
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Concise signal models' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask