Page 1 / 1
This module covers techniques for the simplification of radicals.

The property $\sqrt{\text{ab}}$ = $\sqrt{a}$ $\sqrt{b}$ can be used to simplify radicals. The key is to break the number inside the root into two factors, one of which is a perfect square .

 $\sqrt{\text{75}}$ $=$ $\sqrt{25•3}$ because 25•3 is 75, and 25 is a perfect square $=$ $\sqrt{25}$ $\sqrt{3}$ because $\sqrt{\text{ab}}$ $=$ $\sqrt{a}$ $\sqrt{b}$ $=5$ $\sqrt{3}$ because $\sqrt{25}$ =5

So we conclude that $\sqrt{\text{75}}$ =5 $\sqrt{3}$ . You can confirm this on your calculator (both are approximately 8.66).

We rewrote 75 as $25•3$ because 25 is a perfect square. We could, of course, also rewrite 75 as $5•15$ , but—although correct—that would not help us simplify, because neither number is a perfect square.

## Simplifying a radical in two steps

 $\sqrt{180}$ $=$ $\sqrt{9•20}$ because $9•20$ is 180, and 9 is a perfect square $=$ $\sqrt{9}$ $\sqrt{20}$ because $\sqrt{\text{ab}}$ $=$ $\sqrt{a}$ $\sqrt{b}$ $=3$ $\sqrt{20}$ So far, so good. But wait! We’re not done! $=3$ $\sqrt{4•5}$ There’s another perfect square to pull out! $=3$ $\sqrt{4}$ $\sqrt{5}$ $=3\left(2\right)$ $\sqrt{5}$ $=6$ $\sqrt{5}$ Now we’re done.

The moral of this second example is that after you simplify, you should always look to see if you can simplify again .

A secondary moral is, try to pull out the biggest perfect square you can. We could have jumped straight to the answer if we had begun by rewriting 180 as $36•5$ .

This sort of simplification can sometimes allow you to combine radical terms, as in this example:

 $\sqrt{\text{75}}$ $–$ $\sqrt{\text{12}}$ $=5$ $\sqrt{3}$ $–2$ $\sqrt{3}$ We found earlier that $\sqrt{\text{75}}$ $=5$ $\sqrt{3}$ . Use the same method to confirm that $\sqrt{\text{12}}$ $=2$ $\sqrt{3}$ . $=3$ $\sqrt{3}$ 5 of anything minus 2 of that same thing is 3 of it, right?

That last step may take a bit of thought. It can only be used when the radical is the same. Hence, $\sqrt{2}$ + $\sqrt{3}$ cannot be simplified at all. We were able to simplify $\sqrt{\text{75}}$ $\sqrt{\text{12}}$ only by making the radical in both cases the same .

So why does $5$ $\sqrt{3}$ $–2$ $\sqrt{3}$ $=3$ $\sqrt{3}$ ? It may be simplest to think about verbally: 5 of these things, minus 2 of the same things, is 3 of them. But you can look at it more formally as a factoring problem, if you see a common factor of $\sqrt{3}$ .

$5$ $\sqrt{3}$ $–2$ $\sqrt{3}$ $=$ $\sqrt{3}$ $\left(5–2\right)=$ $\sqrt{3}$ $\left(3\right)$ .

Of course, the process is exactly the same if variable are involved instead of just numbers!

 ${x}^{\frac{3}{2}}+{x}^{\frac{5}{2}}$ $={x}^{3}+{x}^{5}$ Remember the definition of fractional exponents! $=\sqrt{{x}^{2}*x}+\sqrt{{x}^{4}*x}$ As always, we simplify radicals by factoring them inside the root... $\sqrt{{x}^{2}}*\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{{x}^{4}}*\sqrt{x}$ and then breaking them up... $=x\sqrt{x}+{x}^{2}\sqrt{x}$ and then taking square roots outside! $=\left({x}^{2}+x\right)\sqrt{x}$ Now that the radical is the same, we can combine.

## Rationalizing the denominator

It is always possible to express a fraction with no square roots in the denominator.

Is it always desirable? Some texts are religious about this point: “You should never have a square root in the denominator.” I have absolutely no idea why. To me, $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ looks simpler than $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$ ; I see no overwhelming reason for forbidding the first or preferring the second.

However, there are times when it is useful to remove the radicals from the denominator: for instance, when adding fractions. The trick for doing this is based on the basic rule of fractions: if you multiply the top and bottom of a fraction by the same number, the fraction is unchanged. This rule enables us to say, for instance, that $\frac{2}{3}$ is exactly the same number as $\frac{2\cdot 3}{3\cdot 3}$ = $\frac{6}{9}$ .

In a case like $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ , therefore, you can multiply the top and bottom by $\sqrt{2}$ .

$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ = $\frac{1*2}{\sqrt{2}*\sqrt{2}}$ = $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$

What about a more complicated case, such as $\frac{\sqrt{\text{12}}}{1+\sqrt{3}}$ ? You might think we could simplify this by multiplying the top and bottom by $\left(1+$ $\sqrt{3}$ ), but that doesn’t work: the bottom turns into ${\left(1+3\right)}^{2}$ $=1+2$ $\sqrt{3}$ $+3$ , which is at least as ugly as what we had before.

The correct trick for getting rid of $\left(1+$ $\sqrt{3}$ ) is to multiply it by $\left(1–$ $\sqrt{3}$ ). These two expressions, identical except for the replacement of $\mathrm{a+}$ by $\mathrm{a-}$ , are known as conjugates . What happens when we multiply them? We don’t need to use FOIL if we remember that

$\left(x+y\right)\left(x-y\right)={x}^{2}-{y}^{2}$

Using this formula, we see that

$\left(1+\sqrt{3}\right)\left(1-\sqrt{3}\right)={1}^{2}-{\left(\sqrt{3}\right)}^{2}=1-3=-2$

So the square root does indeed go away. We can use this to simplify the original expression as follows.

## Rationalizing using the conjugate of the denominator

$\frac{\sqrt{\text{12}}}{1+\sqrt{3}}=\frac{\sqrt{12}\left(1-\sqrt{3}\right)}{\left(1+\sqrt{3}\right)\left(1-\sqrt{3}\right)}=\frac{\sqrt{12}-\sqrt{36}}{1-3}=\frac{2\sqrt{3}-6}{-2}=-\sqrt{3}+3$

As always, you may want to check this on your calculator. Both the original and the simplified expression are approximately 1.268.

Of course, the process is the same when variables are involved.

## Rationalizing with variables

$\frac{1}{x-\sqrt{x}}$ = $\frac{1\left(x+\sqrt{x}\right)}{\left(x-\sqrt{x}\right)\left(x+\sqrt{x}\right)}$ = $\frac{x+\sqrt{x}}{{x}^{2}-x}$

Once again, we multiplied the top and the bottom by the conjugate of the denominator : that is, we replaced $\mathrm{a-}$ with $\mathrm{a+}$ . The formula $\left(x+a\right)\left(x-a\right)={x}^{2}-{a}^{2}$ enabled us to quickly multiply the terms on the bottom, and eliminated the square roots in the denominator.

How we are making nano material?
what is a peer
What is meant by 'nano scale'?
What is STMs full form?
LITNING
scanning tunneling microscope
Sahil
what is Nano technology ?
write examples of Nano molecule?
Bob
The nanotechnology is as new science, to scale nanometric
brayan
nanotechnology is the study, desing, synthesis, manipulation and application of materials and functional systems through control of matter at nanoscale
Damian
Is there any normative that regulates the use of silver nanoparticles?
what king of growth are you checking .?
Renato
What fields keep nano created devices from performing or assimulating ? Magnetic fields ? Are do they assimilate ?
why we need to study biomolecules, molecular biology in nanotechnology?
?
Kyle
yes I'm doing my masters in nanotechnology, we are being studying all these domains as well..
why?
what school?
Kyle
biomolecules are e building blocks of every organics and inorganic materials.
Joe
anyone know any internet site where one can find nanotechnology papers?
research.net
kanaga
sciencedirect big data base
Ernesto
Introduction about quantum dots in nanotechnology
what does nano mean?
nano basically means 10^(-9). nanometer is a unit to measure length.
Bharti
do you think it's worthwhile in the long term to study the effects and possibilities of nanotechnology on viral treatment?
absolutely yes
Daniel
how to know photocatalytic properties of tio2 nanoparticles...what to do now
it is a goid question and i want to know the answer as well
Maciej
Abigail
for teaching engĺish at school how nano technology help us
Anassong
How can I make nanorobot?
Lily
Do somebody tell me a best nano engineering book for beginners?
there is no specific books for beginners but there is book called principle of nanotechnology
NANO
how can I make nanorobot?
Lily
what is fullerene does it is used to make bukky balls
are you nano engineer ?
s.
fullerene is a bucky ball aka Carbon 60 molecule. It was name by the architect Fuller. He design the geodesic dome. it resembles a soccer ball.
Tarell
what is the actual application of fullerenes nowadays?
Damian
That is a great question Damian. best way to answer that question is to Google it. there are hundreds of applications for buck minister fullerenes, from medical to aerospace. you can also find plenty of research papers that will give you great detail on the potential applications of fullerenes.
Tarell
what is the Synthesis, properties,and applications of carbon nano chemistry
Mostly, they use nano carbon for electronics and for materials to be strengthened.
Virgil
is Bucky paper clear?
CYNTHIA
carbon nanotubes has various application in fuel cells membrane, current research on cancer drug,and in electronics MEMS and NEMS etc
NANO
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Privacy Information Security Software Version 1.1a
Good
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!      By Anindyo Mukhopadhyay By  By By Prateek Ashtikar