<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Digital filters are essential building blocks for signal processing applications. One of the main goals of this work is to illustrate the versatility and relevance of l p norms in the design of digital filters. While popular and well understood, l 2 and l filters do tend to accentuate specific benefits from their respective designs; filters designed using l p norms as optimality criteria can offer a tradeoff between the benefits of these two commonly used criteria. This work presented a number of applications of L p norms in both FIR and IIR filter design, and their corresponding design algorithms and software implementation.

The basic workhorse for the methods presented in this document is the Iterative Reweighted Least Squares algorithm, a simple yet powerful method that sets itself naturally adept for the design of l p filters. The notion of converting a mathematically complex problem into a series of significantly easier optimization problems is common in optimization. Nevertheless, the existence results from Theorem [link] strongly motivate the use of IRLS methods to design l p filters. Knowing that optimal weights exist that would turn the solution of a weighted least squared problem into the solution of a least- p problem must at the very least captivate the curiosity of the reader. The challenge lies in finding a robust and efficient method to find such weights. All the methods presented in this work work under this basic framework, updating iteratively the weighting function of a least squares problem in order to find the optimal l p filter for a given application. Therefore it is possible to develop a suite of computer programs in a modular way, where with few adjustments one can solve a variety of problems.

Throughout this document one can find examples of the versatility of the IRLS approach. One can change the internal linear objective function from a complex exponential kernel to a sinusoidal one to solve complex and linear phase FIR filters respectively using the same algorithm. Further adaptations can be incorporated with ease, such as the proposed adaptive solution to improve robustness.

Another important design example permits to make p into a function of frequency to allow for different p -norms in different frequency bands. Such design merely requires a few changes in the implementation of the algorithm, yet allows for fancier, more elegant problems to be solved, such as the Constrained Least Squares (CLS) problem. In the context of FIR filters, this document presents the CLS problem from an l p prespective. While the work by John Adams [link] set a milestone in digital filter design, this dissertation introduces a strong algorithm and a different perspective to the problem from that by Adams and other authors. The IRLS l p -based approach from this work proves to be robust and flexible, allowing for even and uneven sampling. Furthermore, while a user can use fixed transition bands, one would benefit much from using a flexible transition band formulation, where the proposed IRLS-based algorithm literally finds the optimal transition band definition based on the constraint specifications. Such flexibility allows for tight constrains that would otherwise cause other algorithms to fail meeting the constraint specifications, or simply not converging at all. [link] introduced two problem formulations as well as results that illustrate the method's effectiveness at solving the CLS problem.

While previous work exists in the area of FIR design (or in linear l p approximation for that matter), the problem of designing l p IIR filters has been far less explored. A natural reason for this is the fact that l 2 IIR design is in itself an open research area (and a rather complicated problem as well). Traditional linear optimization approaches cannot be directly used for either of these problems, and nonlinear optimization tools often prove either slow or do not converge.

This work presents the l p IIR design problem as a natural extension of the FIR counterpart, where in a modular fashion the linear weigthed l 2 section of the algorithms is replaced by a nonlinear weighted l 2 version. This problem formulation allows for the IIR implementation of virtually all the IRLS FIR methods presented in Chapter [link] . Dealing with the weighted nonlinear l 2 problem is a different story.

The problem of rational l 2 approximation has been studied for some time. However the sources of ideas and results related to this problem are scattered across several areas of study. One of the contributions of this work is an organized summary of efforts in rational l 2 optimization, particularly related to the design of IIR digital filters. The work in [link] also lays down a framework for the IIR methods proposed in this work.

As mentioned in [link] , some complications arise when designing IIR l p filters. Aside from the intrinsic l 2 problem, it is necessary to properly combine a number of ideas that allowed for robust and efficient l p FIR methods. A design algorithm for complex l p IIF filters were presented in [link] ; this algorithm combined Soewito's quasilinearization with ideas such as l p homotopy, partial updating and the adaptive modification. In practice, the combination of these ideas showed to be practical and the resulting algorithm remained robust. It was also found that after a few p -steps, the internal l 2 algorithm required from one to merely a few iterations on average, thus maintaining the algorithm efficient.

One of the main contributions of this work is the introduction of an IRLS-based method to solve l p IIR design problems. By properly combining the principle of magnitude approximation via phase updating (from Soewito, Jackson and Kay) with the complex IIR algorithm one can find optimal magntiude l p designs. This work also introduced a sequence of steps that improve the efficiency and robustness of this algorithm, by dividing the design process into three stages and by using suitable initial guesses for each stage.

Appendix [link] incudes the Matlab code developed in this work. Some of the examples in this document were designed using these programs. It is worth to notice the common elements between different programs, alluding to the modularity of the implementations. An added benefit to this setup is that further advances in any of the topics covered in this work can easily be ported to most if not all of the algorithms.

Digital filter design is and will remain an important topic in digital signal processing. It is the hope of the author to have motivated in the reader some curiosity for the use of l p norms as design criteria for applications in FIR and IIR filter design. This work is by no means comprehensive, and is meant to inspire the consideration of the flexibility of IRLS algorithms for new l p related problems.

Questions & Answers

differentiate between demand and supply giving examples
Lambiv Reply
differentiated between demand and supply using examples
Lambiv
what is labour ?
Lambiv
how will I do?
Venny Reply
how is the graph works?I don't fully understand
Rezat Reply
information
Eliyee
devaluation
Eliyee
t
WARKISA
hi guys good evening to all
Lambiv
multiple choice question
Aster Reply
appreciation
Eliyee
explain perfect market
Lindiwe Reply
In economics, a perfect market refers to a theoretical construct where all participants have perfect information, goods are homogenous, there are no barriers to entry or exit, and prices are determined solely by supply and demand. It's an idealized model used for analysis,
Ezea
What is ceteris paribus?
Shukri Reply
other things being equal
AI-Robot
When MP₁ becomes negative, TP start to decline. Extuples Suppose that the short-run production function of certain cut-flower firm is given by: Q=4KL-0.6K2 - 0.112 • Where is quantity of cut flower produced, I is labour input and K is fixed capital input (K-5). Determine the average product of lab
Kelo
Extuples Suppose that the short-run production function of certain cut-flower firm is given by: Q=4KL-0.6K2 - 0.112 • Where is quantity of cut flower produced, I is labour input and K is fixed capital input (K-5). Determine the average product of labour (APL) and marginal product of labour (MPL)
Kelo
yes,thank you
Shukri
Can I ask you other question?
Shukri
what is monopoly mean?
Habtamu Reply
What is different between quantity demand and demand?
Shukri Reply
Quantity demanded refers to the specific amount of a good or service that consumers are willing and able to purchase at a give price and within a specific time period. Demand, on the other hand, is a broader concept that encompasses the entire relationship between price and quantity demanded
Ezea
ok
Shukri
how do you save a country economic situation when it's falling apart
Lilia Reply
what is the difference between economic growth and development
Fiker Reply
Economic growth as an increase in the production and consumption of goods and services within an economy.but Economic development as a broader concept that encompasses not only economic growth but also social & human well being.
Shukri
production function means
Jabir
What do you think is more important to focus on when considering inequality ?
Abdisa Reply
any question about economics?
Awais Reply
sir...I just want to ask one question... Define the term contract curve? if you are free please help me to find this answer 🙏
Asui
it is a curve that we get after connecting the pareto optimal combinations of two consumers after their mutually beneficial trade offs
Awais
thank you so much 👍 sir
Asui
In economics, the contract curve refers to the set of points in an Edgeworth box diagram where both parties involved in a trade cannot be made better off without making one of them worse off. It represents the Pareto efficient allocations of goods between two individuals or entities, where neither p
Cornelius
In economics, the contract curve refers to the set of points in an Edgeworth box diagram where both parties involved in a trade cannot be made better off without making one of them worse off. It represents the Pareto efficient allocations of goods between two individuals or entities,
Cornelius
Suppose a consumer consuming two commodities X and Y has The following utility function u=X0.4 Y0.6. If the price of the X and Y are 2 and 3 respectively and income Constraint is birr 50. A,Calculate quantities of x and y which maximize utility. B,Calculate value of Lagrange multiplier. C,Calculate quantities of X and Y consumed with a given price. D,alculate optimum level of output .
Feyisa Reply
Answer
Feyisa
c
Jabir
the market for lemon has 10 potential consumers, each having an individual demand curve p=101-10Qi, where p is price in dollar's per cup and Qi is the number of cups demanded per week by the i th consumer.Find the market demand curve using algebra. Draw an individual demand curve and the market dema
Gsbwnw Reply
suppose the production function is given by ( L, K)=L¼K¾.assuming capital is fixed find APL and MPL. consider the following short run production function:Q=6L²-0.4L³ a) find the value of L that maximizes output b)find the value of L that maximizes marginal product
Abdureman
types of unemployment
Yomi Reply
What is the difference between perfect competition and monopolistic competition?
Mohammed
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Iterative design of l_p digital filters. OpenStax CNX. Dec 07, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11383/1.1
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Iterative design of l_p digital filters' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask