<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Finally, presidents have also used the line-item veto and signing statements to alter or influence the application of the laws they sign. A line-item veto    is a type of veto that keeps the majority of a spending bill unaltered but nullifies certain lines of spending within it. While a number of states allow their governors the line-item veto (discussed in the chapter on state and local government), the president acquired this power only in 1996 after Congress passed a law permitting it. President Clinton used the tool sparingly. However, those entities that stood to receive the federal funding he lined out brought suit. Two such groups were the City of New York and the Snake River Potato Growers in Idaho.

Glen S. Krutz. 2001. Hitching a Ride: Omnibus Legislating in the U.S. Congress. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
The Supreme Court heard their claims together and just sixteen months later declared unconstitutional the act that permitted the line-item veto.
Clinton v. City of New York , 524 U.S. 417 (1998).
Since then, presidents have asked Congress to draft a line-item veto law that would be constitutional, although none have made it to the president’s desk.

On the other hand, signing statements are statements issued by a president when agreeing to legislation that indicate how the chief executive will interpret and enforce the legislation in question. Signing statements are less powerful than vetoes, though congressional opponents have complained that they derail legislative intent. Signing statements have been used by presidents since at least James Monroe, but they became far more common in this century.

National security, foreign policy, and war

Presidents are more likely to justify the use of executive orders in cases of national security or as part of their war powers. In addition to mandating emancipation and the internment of Japanese Americans, presidents have issued orders to protect the homeland from internal threats. Most notably, Lincoln ordered the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in 1861 and 1862 before seeking congressional legislation to undertake such an act. Presidents hire and fire military commanders; they also use their power as commander-in-chief to aggressively deploy U.S. military force. Congress rarely has taken the lead over the course of history, with the War of 1812 being the lone exception. Pearl Harbor was a salient case where Congress did make a clear and formal declaration when asked by FDR. However, since World War II, it has been the president and not Congress who has taken the lead in engaging the United States in military action outside the nation’s boundaries, most notably in Korea, Vietnam, and the Persian Gulf ( [link] ).

A photo of George W. Bush in a flight suit stepping out of a plane onto an aircraft carrier. Personnel stand on either side and salute him.
By landing on an aircraft carrier and wearing a flight suit to announce the end of major combat operations in Iraq in 2003, President George W. Bush was carefully emphasizing his presidential power as commander-in-chief. (credit: Tyler J. Clements)

Questions & Answers

powers of the judiciary
Princewill Reply
powers of the judiciary
Princewill
what is bicameral legislature
Moses
discuss features of Igbo
Saad Reply
what is power
Moses Reply
what is sovereignty
Damian Reply
supreme power of attorney .
Amber
the political philosophy that ordinary people can govern themselves
Meia Reply
sovereign
Damian
explain 5 reasons for the adoption of unitary system of government in some countries
Joel Reply
explain 5 reasons for the adoption of unitary system of government in some government
Joel
is that not a contradiction of itself? Of course that is just my unitary thought and opinion.
Jesse
what is a goverment compose of
Claudia Reply
Judicial, Executive, Legislative branches
Chatbot
The Constitution: Name Specific Constitutional procedure for confirming presidential appointees?
Chatbot
Executive, Legislative and Judicial are the three arms of government
Rashid
an authoritative party given authority by a people in an area presumably controlled by the people, to foster law and elected administration for progressively conservative ideas that encompass social ethics, and inspire peaceful congregations.
Jesse
The US has a Judicial, Legislative, and Executive branches of federal government. Also we adopt state, and local principalities that sometimes defer the federal, yet is usually respected in the locality.
Jesse
What is pressure group
Felcia Reply
what is election
Faith Reply
A election is a formal and organized choice by voters of a person or people for a political office or other position.
Tina
Ok. Thanks not sure why you sent that to me. But ok?
Chatbot
What if the people of country did not want
Sadam Reply
Can you explain the Stockdale Paradox
Patricia Reply
How the capital market can create a better future for all import and benefit
Egbo Reply
features of Igbo
Saad
in the dred scott case what did the supreme court decide the Congress had no power to do
Kazi Reply
who was james madison
Ceceilia Reply
Founding Father who fought to add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution he helped write (called the "Father of the Constitution"). He and Jefferson didn't want the federal govt to overpower the states (Democratic-Republican party). Cowrote The Federalist Papers. 4th President of the US (1809-1817).
Aaron
hi
Serah
how are you doing
Bubacarr
hi
Nicole
hello
faithsia
who has the power to declare war
Fernandy Reply
president who is commander in chief
Abu
Adam the president
Talima
Congress
Jesse

Get the best American government course in your pocket!





Source:  OpenStax, American government. OpenStax CNX. Dec 05, 2016 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11995/1.15
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'American government' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask