<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

The most controversial provision of the Eighth Amendment is the ban on “cruel and unusual punishments.” Various torturous forms of execution common in the past—drawing and quartering, burning people alive, and the like—are prohibited by this provision.

See, for example, the discussion in Wilkerson v. Utah , 99 U.S. 130 (1879).
Recent controversies over lethal injections and firing squads to administer the death penalty suggest the topic is still salient. While the Supreme Court has never established a definitive test for what constitutes a cruel and unusual punishment, it has generally allowed most penalties short of death for adults, even when to outside observers the punishment might be reasonably seen as disproportionate or excessive.
Perhaps the most notorious example, Harmelin v. Michigan , 501 U.S. 957 (1991), upheld a life sentence in a case where the defendant was convicted of possessing just over one pound of cocaine (and no other crime).

In recent years the Supreme Court has issued a series of rulings substantially narrowing the application of the death penalty. As a result, defendants who have mental disabilities may not be executed.

Atkins v. Virginia , 536 U.S. 304 (2002).
Also, defendants who were under eighteen when they committed an offense that is otherwise subject to the death penalty may not be executed.
Roper v. Simmons , 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
The court has generally rejected the application of the death penalty to crimes that did not result in the death of another human being, most notably in the case of rape.
Kennedy v. Louisiana , 554 U.S. 407 (2008).
And, while permitting the death penalty to be applied to murder in some cases, the Supreme Court has generally struck down laws that require the application of the death penalty in certain circumstances. Still, the United States is among ten countries with the most executions worldwide ( [link] ).

Chart showing the rate of execution in the 10 countries with the highest execution rates. The chart is titled “Rate of Execution in the 10 Countries with the Most Executions, 2007 – 2012”. The chart is divided into three columns, “Country”, “Number of annual executions, on average”, and “Number of annual executions, per capita”. Under the first column “Country” are the values “Iran”, “Saudi Arabia”, “Iraq”, “China”, “Libya”, “Yemen”, “North Korea”, “Pakistan”, “United States”, and “Vietnam”. Under the second column “Number of annual executions, on average” are the values “277.2”, “70.5”, “42.7”, “1720-2400”, “6.5”, “25.3”, “17.5”, “28.5”, “36.7,” and “9.7”. Under the third column “Number of annual executions, per capita” are the values “0.000381%”, “0.000257%”, “0.000157%”, “0.000129-0.000180% (estimate)”, “0.000116%”, “0.000109%”, “0.000073%”, “0.000016%”, “0.000012%”, and “0.000001%”. At the bottom of the chart the source is listed as “Source: Amnesty International, “Death Penalty Statistics, Country by Country.” 2012”.
The United States has the ninth highest per capita rate of execution in the world.

At the same time, however, it appears that the public mood may have shifted somewhat against the death penalty, perhaps due in part to an overall decline in violent crime. The reexamination of past cases through DNA evidence has revealed dozens in which people were wrongfully executed.

Elizabeth Lopatto, “How Many Innocent People Are Sentenced To Death?,” Forbes , 29 April 2014. http://www.forbes.com/sites/elizabethlopatto/2014/04/29/how-many-innocent-people-are-sentenced-to-death/#6e9ae5175cc1 (March 1, 2016).
For example, Claude Jones was executed for murder based on 1990-era DNA testing of a single hair that was determined at that time to be his; however, with better DNA testing technology, it was later found to be that of the victim.
Dave Mann, “DNA Tests Undermine Evidence in Texas Execution: New Results Show Claude Jones was Put to Death on Flawed Evidence,” Texas Observer , 11 November 2010. http://www.texasobserver.org/texas-observer-exclusive-dna-tests-undermine-evidence-in-texas-execution/ (March 4, 2016).
Perhaps as a result of this and other cases, seven additional states have abolished capital punishment since 2007. As of 2015, nineteen states and the District of Columbia no longer apply the death penalty in new cases, and several other states do not carry out executions despite sentencing people to death.
See, for example, “States With and Without the Death Penalty,” Death Penalty Information Center, http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/states-and-without-death-penalty (March 4, 2016).
It remains to be seen whether this gradual trend toward the elimination of the death penalty by the states will continue, or whether the Supreme Court will eventually decide to follow former Justice Harry Blackmun ’s decision to “no longer… tinker with the machinery of death” and abolish it completely.

The rights of those suspected, accused, and convicted of crimes, along with rights in civil cases and economic liberties, are protected by the second major grouping of amendments within the Bill of Rights. The Fifth Amendment secures various procedural safeguards, protects suspects’ right to remain silent, forbids trying someone twice at the same level of government for the same criminal act, and limits the taking of property for public uses. The Sixth Amendment ensures fairness in criminal trials, including through a fair and speedy trial by an impartial jury, the right to assistance of counsel, and the right to examine and compel testimony from witnesses. The Seventh Amendment ensures the right to jury trials in most civil cases (but only at the federal level). Finally, the Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive fines and bails, as well as “cruel and unusual punishments,” although the scope of what is cruel and unusual is subject to debate.

Questions & Answers

how many types of pre_ colonial political system do we have in Nigeria
Israel Reply
opening day in the house. what is the speaker's first duty
Gabriel Reply
what is bill of right?
Dyutoe Reply
first 10 amendments to the Constitution
what prevented the equal rights Amendment from being ratified?
Darhel Reply
why some countries adopts written constitution
Paschal Reply
what part of our government is based on parliament
SonIa Reply
what important political idea came from Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes who is he
what is democracy
Haliru Reply
what is Constitution
Joy Reply
What's separation of power in government?
Fortune Reply
What's political parties?
What's Political apathy
political parties can be defined as a group of people who share a common interest
political apathy it can be defined by act of not having Interest in any politics
political parties are organised group of citizens,acting as a political unit and through the use of their voting power trys to control the government.
what are the broad purposes of government
Slande Reply
what is constition
Diana Reply
What is government
Kweku Reply
Government is the body with power to make and enforce laws to control a country, land,area people or organization.
Why government, why no other forms of get together as a community
Sunday Reply
consider the constitucional powers of cpngress. which are most important? why?
Mary Reply
what is the meaning of democrats in government
peju Reply
what is the meaning of distributive policy
Democrat in government is a supporter of democracy; an advocate of democratic politics(originally as opposed to the aristocrats in Revolutionary france). It also mean, someone who rules a representative democracy.

Get the best American government course in your pocket!

Source:  OpenStax, American government. OpenStax CNX. Dec 05, 2016 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11995/1.15
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'American government' conversation and receive update notifications?