# 33.1 Absolute and comparative advantage  (Page 4/15)

 Page 4 / 15
The range of trades that benefit both the united states and saudi arabia
The U.S. Economy, after Specialization, Will Benefit If It: The Saudi Arabian Economy, after Specialization, Will Benefit If It:
Exports no more than 60 bushels of corn Imports at least 10 bushels of corn
Imports at least 20 barrels of oil Exports less than 60 barrels of oil

The underlying reason why trade benefits both sides is rooted in the concept of opportunity cost, as the following Clear It Up feature explains. If Saudi Arabia wishes to expand domestic production of corn in a world without international trade, then based on its opportunity costs it must give up four barrels of oil for every one additional bushel of corn. If Saudi Arabia could find a way to give up less than four barrels of oil for an additional bushel of corn (or equivalently, to receive more than one bushel of corn for four barrels of oil), it would be better off.

## What are the opportunity costs and gains from trade?

The range of trades that will benefit each country is based on the country’s opportunity cost of producing each good. The United States can produce 100 bushels of corn or 50 barrels of oil. For the United States, the opportunity cost of producing one barrel of oil is two bushels of corn. If we divide the numbers above by 50, we get the same ratio: one barrel of oil is equivalent to two bushels of corn, or (100/50 = 2 and 50/50 = 1). In a trade with Saudi Arabia, if the United States is going to give up 100 bushels of corn in exports, it must import at least 50 barrels of oil to be just as well off. Clearly, to gain from trade it needs to be able to gain more than a half barrel of oil for its bushel of corn—or why trade at all?

Recall that David Ricardo argued that if each country specializes in its comparative advantage, it will benefit from trade, and total global output will increase. How can we show gains from trade as a result of comparative advantage and specialization? [link] shows the output assuming that each country specializes in its comparative advantage and produces no other good. This is 100% specialization. Specialization leads to an increase in total world production. (Compare the total world production in [link] to that in [link] .)

How specialization expands output
Country Quantity produced after 100% specialization — Oil (barrels) Quantity produced after 100% specialization — Corn (bushels)
Saudi Arabia 100   0
United States   0 100
Total World Production 100 100

What if we did not have complete specialization, as in [link] ? Would there still be gains from trade? Consider another example, such as when the United States and Saudi Arabia start at C and C', respectively, as shown in [link] . Consider what occurs when trade is allowed and the United States exports 20 bushels of corn to Saudi Arabia in exchange for 20 barrels of oil.

Starting at point C, reduce Saudi Oil production by 20 and exchange it for 20 units of corn to reach point D (see [link] ). Notice that even without 100% specialization, if the “trading price,” in this case 20 barrels of oil for 20 bushels of corn, is greater than the country’s opportunity cost, the Saudis will gain from trade. Indeed both countries consume more of both goods after specialized production and trade occurs.

Visit this website for trade-related data visualizations.

## Key concepts and summary

A country has an absolute advantage in those products in which it has a productivity edge over other countries; it takes fewer resources to produce a product. A country has a comparative advantage when a good can be produced at a lower cost in terms of other goods. Countries that specialize based on comparative advantage gain from trade.

## Problems

France and Tunisia both have Mediterranean climates that are excellent for producing/harvesting green beans and tomatoes. In France it takes two hours for each worker to harvest green beans and two hours to harvest a tomato. Tunisian workers need only one hour to harvest the tomatoes but four hours to harvest green beans. Assume there are only two workers, one in each country, and each works 40 hours a week.

1. Draw a production possibilities frontier for each country. Hint : Remember the production possibility frontier is the maximum that all workers can produce at a unit of time which, in this problem, is a week.
2. Identify which country has the absolute advantage in green beans and which country has the absolute advantage in tomatoes.
3. Identify which country has the comparative advantage.
4. How much would France have to give up in terms of tomatoes to gain from trade? How much would it have to give up in terms of green beans?

## References

Krugman, Paul R. Pop Internationalism . The MIT Press, Cambridge. 1996.

Krugman, Paul R. “What Do Undergrads Need to Know about Trade?” American Economic Review 83, no. 2. 1993. 23-26.

Ricardo, David. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation . London: John Murray, 1817.

Ricardo, David. “On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation.” Library of Economics and Liberty. http://www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP.html.

what are the examples of price elasticity of supply
elastic, inelastic, unitary
joseph
Evaluate the impact of corona virus on the economy of china
lose of global market unemployment Expenses low export
Bangi
The similarities and difference between the definition of prof Lionel Robbins and prof Paul ; A; Samuel son, each 5 definition
What are the basic concepts of economic
With the aid of appropriate diagram differentiate between change in demand
explain demand
Demand is a quantity of goods and services a consumer is willing to buy at given price in a period of time.
who break in bulk
Alaka
what is demands and it law
Demands, is the quantity of agoods a consumer is willing to buy at given price in a give period of time where as the law of demand states that, the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded by consumers
what is division of labour
The similarities and difference between the definition of prof Lionel Robbins and prof Paul ; A; Samuel son, each 5 definition
prince
Demand is set to be enlastic when its what
Cant you speak in English
john
a little
Tith
I do speak English.. the question is Demand is set to be elasticity went the dash *2
bohvy
if I want some document from,that 9k?
Tith
hi
muhammed
if both %^ Increase in input & %^ increase in output, then it is elastic and = to 1.
Rowda
Allah's Allah's last I'll be in the area around.....
Hy guyz
Vuyai
Hi
john
How are you all doing rumies
john
why is scarcity a fundamental problem in economic
what is demand curve
xplain
Ubong
thanks for your help with the same....
What is elasticity of demand
Karim
what is unemployment
Alaka
what is opportunity cost
Opportunity cost which also mean real cost it is a term used for foregone alternatives
john
what is demand
Demand may simply be define as the total quantity of good or service a consumer are willing to buy at a specific price within a period of time.
john
How economics is related to other subjects?
It is social science related subjects
john
How ? explain
Mikateko
Mikateko
s classified as a social science. This view makes eco­nomics an academic relative of political science, sociology, psychology and anthropology. All of these disciplines study the behaviour of human beings individually and in groups.
john
The business cycle describes the rise and fall in production output of goods and services in an economy. Business cycles are generally measured using the rise and fall in the real gross domestic product (GDP) or the GDP.
john
hello everyone
Selena
hii
Yes
hello selena
Yes
How are you doing every one
john
hello Selena
Yes
hi
NONSO
yes
NONSO