# 5.1 Vizing's conjecture and related graph properties  (Page 2/4)

 Page 2 / 4

## Vizing's conjecture

Creating bounds for domination numbers is common practice since calculating a graphs domination number was proven NP-Complete by Garey and Johnson [link] in 1976. Arguably, the biggest open problem in Domination Theory is Vizing's Conjecture. It states that the product of the domination number of any two simple graphs $G$ and $H$ is no larger than the domination number of their cartesian product graph.

$\gamma \left(G\right)\gamma \left(H\right)\le \gamma \left(G\square H\right)$

## Clark and suen's proof

In 2000, Clark and Suen [link] proved that for any simple graphs G and H,

$\gamma \left(G\right)\gamma \left(H\right)\le 2\gamma \left(G\square H\right)$

Their proof finds an upper and lower bound for the number of dominatiors in a Cartesian product, and combines the inqualities to put a bound on $\gamma \left(G\square H\right)$ . The proof is shown here:

Say that D is a dominating set of $G\square H$ . Let $\left\{{u}_{1},...,{u}_{\gamma \left(G\right)}\right\}$ be a dominating set of $G$ . We can create partitions $\left\{{\Pi }_{1},...,{\Pi }_{\gamma \left(G\right)}\right\}$ such that if $u\in {\Pi }_{i}$ , then $u={u}_{i}$ or $u\in N\left({u}_{i}\right)$ . Now we can create a partition of dominators $\left\{{D}_{1},...,{D}_{\gamma \left(G\right)}\right\}$ , where

${D}_{i}=\left({\Pi }_{i}×V\left(H\right)\right)\cap D$

Let

${P}_{i}=\left\{v:\left(u,v\right)\in {D}_{i},u\in {\Pi }_{i}\right\}$

Since ${P}_{i}\cup \left(V\left(H\right)-{N}_{H}\left[{P}_{i}\right]\right)$ is a dominating set of $H$ for any $i$ , the number of vertices in $V\left(H\right)$ not dominated by ${P}_{i}$ satisfies

$|V\left(H\right)-{N}_{H}\left[{P}_{i}\right]|+|{P}_{i}|\ge \gamma \left(H\right)$

For $v\in V\left(H\right)$ , let

${Q}_{v}=D\cap \left(V\left(G\right)×\left\{v\right\}\right)=\left\{\left(u,v\right)\in D:u\in V\left(G\right)\right\}$

Also, let

$C=\left\{\left(i,v\right):{\Pi }_{i}×\left\{v\right\}\subseteq {N}_{G\square H}\left[{Q}_{v}\right]\right\}$

Now, we want to find upper and lower bounds for $|C|$ . Let

${L}_{i}=\left\{\left(i,v\right)\in C:v\in V\left(H\right)\right\}$
${R}_{v}=\left\{\left(i,v\right)\in C:1\le i\le \gamma \left(G\right)\right\}$

We then see that:

$|C|=\sum _{i=1}^{\gamma \left(G\right)}|{L}_{i}|=\sum _{v\in V\left(H\right)}^{}|{R}_{v}|$

Note that if $v\in V\left(H\right)-{N}_{H}\left[{P}_{i}\right]$ , then the vertices in ${\Pi }_{i}×\left\{v\right\}$ must be dominated by vertices in ${Q}_{v}$ , so $\left(i,v\right)\in {L}_{i}$ . This implies that

${L}_{i}\ge |V\left(H\right)-{N}_{H}\left[{P}_{I}\right]|$

So,

$|C|\ge \sum _{i=1}^{\gamma \left(G\right)}|V\left(H\right)-{N}_{H}\left[{P}_{i}\right]|\ge \gamma \left(G\right)\gamma \left(H\right)-\sum _{i=1}^{\gamma \left(G\right)}|{P}_{i}|\ge \gamma \left(G\right)\gamma \left(H\right)-\sum _{i=1}^{\gamma \left(G\right)}|{D}_{i}|$

For each $v\in V\left(H\right),|{R}_{v}|\le |{Q}_{v}|$ . If not, $\left\{u:\left(u,v\right)\in {Q}_{v}\right\}\cup \left\{{u}_{j}:\left(j,v\right)\notin {R}_{v}\right\}$ is a dominating set in G with cardinality

$|{Q}_{v}|+\left(\gamma \left(G\right)-|{R}_{v}|\right)=\gamma \left(G\right)-\left(|{R}_{v}|-|{Q}_{v}|\right)<\gamma \left(G\right)$

which is a contradiction. Then

$|C|=\sum _{v\in V\left(H\right)|}^{}|{R}_{v}|\le \sum _{v\in V\left(H\right)}^{}|{Q}_{v}|=|D|$

It then follows that $\gamma \left(G\right)\gamma \left(H\right)-|D|\le |C|\le |D|$ , which concludes the theorem. $\square$

## Proofs for specific cases of $\gamma \left(G\right)$

Additionally, the proofs that Vizing's conjecture holds for $\gamma \left(G\right)=1$ and $\gamma \left(G\right)=2$ are trivial. In 2004, Sun [link] proved that Vizing's conjecture holds for $\gamma \left(G\right)=3$ . We will briefly step through the main ideas behind the proof here.

The idea behind the proof is that we can count three disjoint sets of dominators in $G\square H$ , such that each of these sets has cardinality of at least $\gamma \left(H\right)$ . Since the sets are disjoint, the number of dominators in $G\square H$ must be at least the sum of the cardinalities of these sets, namely $3\gamma \left(H\right)=\gamma \left(G\right)\gamma \left(H\right)$ . First, we assume that $G$ is 3-critical. This generalizes for all graphs with $\gamma \left(G\right)=3$ , by a bit of reasoning we will go through next. Without loss of generality, we can call the dominators of $G\left\{1,p,q\right\}$ , with $1=V\left(G\right)-N\left[p\right]\cup N\left[q\right]$ . A set with this property always exists in a 3-critical graph. Obviously 1 is adjacent to neither $p$ nor $q$ , but the proof must check the cases in which $p$ and $q$ are adjacent to each other and the case in which they are not. It uses these cases to build the appropriate subcases, and some of the math can be cumbersome and difficult to follow.

## The step to k-critical

This assumption is key to Sun's proof, but how does she justify this assumption? The k-critical assumption comes from a familiar trick that has been used in proofs for many simple inequalities including the AM-GM inequality. We start by generating an algorithm to raise or lower one side of the inequality while leaving the other unchanged. In the K-critical assumption we want to keep both $\gamma \left(G\right)$ and $\gamma \left(H\right)$ unchanged while lowering $\gamma \left(G\square H\right)$ . So the algorithm works as follows:

#### Questions & Answers

Is there any normative that regulates the use of silver nanoparticles?
Damian Reply
what king of growth are you checking .?
Renato
What fields keep nano created devices from performing or assimulating ? Magnetic fields ? Are do they assimilate ?
Stoney Reply
why we need to study biomolecules, molecular biology in nanotechnology?
Adin Reply
?
Kyle
yes I'm doing my masters in nanotechnology, we are being studying all these domains as well..
Adin
why?
Adin
what school?
Kyle
biomolecules are e building blocks of every organics and inorganic materials.
Joe
anyone know any internet site where one can find nanotechnology papers?
Damian Reply
research.net
kanaga
sciencedirect big data base
Ernesto
Introduction about quantum dots in nanotechnology
Praveena Reply
what does nano mean?
Anassong Reply
nano basically means 10^(-9). nanometer is a unit to measure length.
Bharti
do you think it's worthwhile in the long term to study the effects and possibilities of nanotechnology on viral treatment?
Damian Reply
absolutely yes
Daniel
how to know photocatalytic properties of tio2 nanoparticles...what to do now
Akash Reply
it is a goid question and i want to know the answer as well
Maciej
characteristics of micro business
Abigail
for teaching engĺish at school how nano technology help us
Anassong
Do somebody tell me a best nano engineering book for beginners?
s. Reply
there is no specific books for beginners but there is book called principle of nanotechnology
NANO
what is fullerene does it is used to make bukky balls
Devang Reply
are you nano engineer ?
s.
fullerene is a bucky ball aka Carbon 60 molecule. It was name by the architect Fuller. He design the geodesic dome. it resembles a soccer ball.
Tarell
what is the actual application of fullerenes nowadays?
Damian
That is a great question Damian. best way to answer that question is to Google it. there are hundreds of applications for buck minister fullerenes, from medical to aerospace. you can also find plenty of research papers that will give you great detail on the potential applications of fullerenes.
Tarell
what is the Synthesis, properties,and applications of carbon nano chemistry
Abhijith Reply
Mostly, they use nano carbon for electronics and for materials to be strengthened.
Virgil
is Bucky paper clear?
CYNTHIA
carbon nanotubes has various application in fuel cells membrane, current research on cancer drug,and in electronics MEMS and NEMS etc
NANO
so some one know about replacing silicon atom with phosphorous in semiconductors device?
s. Reply
Yeah, it is a pain to say the least. You basically have to heat the substarte up to around 1000 degrees celcius then pass phosphene gas over top of it, which is explosive and toxic by the way, under very low pressure.
Harper
Do you know which machine is used to that process?
s.
how to fabricate graphene ink ?
SUYASH Reply
for screen printed electrodes ?
SUYASH
What is lattice structure?
s. Reply
of graphene you mean?
Ebrahim
or in general
Ebrahim
in general
s.
Graphene has a hexagonal structure
tahir
On having this app for quite a bit time, Haven't realised there's a chat room in it.
Cied
what is biological synthesis of nanoparticles
Sanket Reply
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Smarajit Reply
Privacy Information Security Software Version 1.1a
Good
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

### Read also:

#### Get the best Algebra and trigonometry course in your pocket!

Source:  OpenStax, The art of the pfug. OpenStax CNX. Jun 05, 2013 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10523/1.34
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'The art of the pfug' conversation and receive update notifications?

 By Jordon Humphreys By Sam Luong By Nick Swain By