# 0.19 Applications of vc bound

 Page 1 / 1

## Linear classifiers

Suppose $\mathcal{F}$ = {linear classifiers in ${\mathbf{R}}^{d}$ }, then we have

${V}_{\mathcal{F}}=d+1,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}=arg\underset{f\in \mathcal{F}}{min}{\stackrel{^}{R}}_{n}\left(f\right)$
$E\left[R\left({\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}\right)\right]-\underset{f\in \mathcal{F}}{inf}R\left(f\right)\le 4\sqrt{\frac{\left(d+1\right)log\left(n+1\right)+log2}{n}}.$

## Generalized linear classifiers

Normally, we have a feature vector $X\in {\mathbf{R}}^{d}$ . A hyperplane in ${\mathbf{R}}^{d}$ provides a linear classifier in ${\mathbf{R}}^{d}$ . Nonlinear classifiers can be obtained by a straightforward generalization.

Let ${\phi }_{1},\cdots ,{\phi }_{{d}^{{}^{\text{'}}}}$ , ${d}^{{}^{\text{'}}}\ge d$ be a collection of functions mapping ${\mathbf{R}}^{d}\to \mathbf{R}$ . These functions, applied to a feature $X\in {\mathbf{R}}^{d}$ , produce a generalized set of features, $\phi ={\left({\phi }_{1}\left(X\right),{\phi }_{2}\left(X\right),\cdots ,{\phi }_{{d}^{\text{'}}}\left(X\right)\right)}^{\text{'}}$ . For example, if $X={\left({x}_{1},{x}_{2}\right)}^{\text{'}}$ , then we could consider ${d}^{\text{'}}=S$ and $\phi ={\left({x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{1}{x}_{2},{x}_{1}^{2},{x}_{2}^{2}\right)}^{\text{'}}\in {\mathbf{R}}^{5}$ . We can then construct a linear classifier in the higher dimensional generalized feature space ${\mathbf{R}}^{{d}^{\text{'}}}$ .

The VC bounds immediately extend to this case, and we have for $\mathcal{F}$ ' = { generalized linear classifiers based on maps $\phi :{\mathbf{R}}^{d}\to {\mathbf{R}}^{{d}^{\text{'}}}$ },

$E\left[R\left({\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}\right)\right]-\underset{f\in {\mathcal{F}}^{\text{'}}}{inf}R\left(f\right)\le 4\sqrt{\frac{\left({d}^{\text{'}}+1\right)log\left(n+1\right)+log2}{n}}.$

Theorem

## Steele '75, dudley '78

Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a finite-dimensional vector space of real-valued functions on ${\mathbf{R}}^{d}$ . The class of sets $\mathcal{A}=\left\{\left\{x:g\left(x\right)\ge 0\right\}:g\in \mathcal{G}\right\}$ has VC dimension $\ge$ dim( $\mathcal{G}$ ).

It is sufficient to show that no set of $n=dim\left(\mathcal{G}\right)+1$ points can be shattered by $\mathcal{A}$ . Take any $n$ points and for each $g\in \mathcal{G}$ , define the vector ${V}_{g}=\left(g\left({x}_{1}\right),\cdots ,g\left({x}_{n}\right)\right)$ .

The set $\left\{{V}_{g}:g\in \mathcal{G}\right\}$ is a linear subspace of ${\mathbf{R}}^{n}$ of dimension $\le$ dim ( $\mathcal{G}$ ) = $n-1$ . Therefore, there exists a non-zero vector $\alpha =\left({\alpha }_{1},\cdots ,{\alpha }_{n}\right)\in {\mathbf{R}}^{n}$ such that ${\sum }_{i=1}^{n}{\alpha }_{i}g\left({x}_{i}\right)=0$ . We can assume that at least one of these ${\alpha }_{i}^{S}$ is negative (if all are positive, just negate the sum). We can then re-arrange thisexpression as ${\sum }_{i:{\alpha }_{i}\ge 0}{\alpha }_{i}g\left({x}_{i}\right)={\sum }_{i:{\alpha }_{i}<0}-{\alpha }_{i}g\left({x}_{i}\right)$ .

Now suppose that there exists a $g\in \mathcal{G}$ such that the set $\left\{x:g\left(x\right)\ge 0\right\}$ selects precisely the ${x}_{i}^{S}$ on the left-hand side above. Then all terms on the left are non-negative and allthe terms on the right are non-positive. Since $\alpha$ is non-zero, this is a contradiction. Therefore, ${x}_{1},\cdots ,{x}_{n}$ cannot be shattered by sets in $\left\{x:g\left(x\right)\ge 0\right\}$ , $g\in \mathcal{G}$ .  6.375pt0.0pt6.375pt

Consider half-spaces in ${\mathbf{R}}^{d}$ of the form $\mathcal{A}=\left\{x\in {\mathbf{R}}^{d}:{x}_{i}\ge b,i\in \left\{1,\cdots ,d\right\},b\in R\right\}$ . Each half-space can be described by

$g\left(x\right)=\left[0,,,\cdots ,,,0,,,1,,,0,,,\cdots ,,,0\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{x}_{1}\hfill \\ ⋮\hfill \\ {x}_{d}\hfill \end{array}\right]-b$
$⇒dim\left(\mathcal{G}\right)=d+1,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{V}_{\mathcal{A}}\le d+1.$

## Tree classifiers

Let

${\mathcal{T}}_{k}=\left\{r,e,c,u,r,s,i,v,e,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},r,e,c,t,a,n,g,u,l,a,r,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},p,a,r,t,i,t,i,o,n,s,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},o,f,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},{\mathbf{R}}^{d},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},w,i,t,h,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},k,+,1,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},c,e,l,l,s\right\}$

Let $T\in {\mathcal{T}}_{k}$ . Each cell of $T$ results from splitting a rectangular region into two smaller rectangles parallel to one ofthe coordinate axes.

$T\in {\mathcal{T}}_{3}$ , $d=2$ .

Each additional split is analogous to a half-space set. Therefore, each additional split can potentially shatter $d+1$ points. This implies that

${V}_{{\mathcal{T}}_{k}}\le \left(d+1\right)k.$

$d=1$ .

$k=1$ split shatters two points.

$k=2$ splits shatters three points $<4$ .

## Vc bound for tree classifiers

${\mathcal{F}}_{k}=\left\{tree\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}classifiers\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}with\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}k+1\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}leafs\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}on\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathbf{R}}^{d}\right\}$
$E\left[R\left({\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}\right)\right]-\underset{f\in {\mathcal{F}}_{k}}{inf}R\left(f\right)\le 4\sqrt{\frac{\left(d+1\right)klogn+log2}{n}}.$

How can we decide what dimension to choose for a generalized linear classifier?

How many leafs should be used for a classification tree?

Complexity Regularization using VC bounds!

## Structural risk minimization (srm)

SRM is simply complexity regularization using VC type bounds in place of Chernoff's bound or other concentration inequalities.

The basic idea is to consider a sequence of sets of classifiers ${\mathcal{F}}_{1},{\mathcal{F}}_{2},...,$ of increasing VC dimensions ${V}_{{\mathcal{F}}_{1}}\le {V}_{{\mathcal{F}}_{2}}\le ...$ . Then for each $k=1,2,...$ we find the minimum empirical risk classifier

${\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}^{\left(k\right)}=arg\underset{f\in {\mathcal{F}}_{k}}{min}{\stackrel{^}{R}}_{n}\left(f\right)$

and then select the final classifier according to

$\stackrel{^}{k}=arg\underset{k\ge 1}{min}\left\{{\stackrel{^}{R}}_{n},\left({\stackrel{^}{t}}_{n}^{\left(k\right)}\right),+,\sqrt{\frac{32{V}_{{\mathcal{F}}_{k}}\left(logn+1\right)}{n}}\right\}$

and ${\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}\equiv {\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}^{\left(\stackrel{^}{k}\right)}$ is the final choice.

The basic rational is that we know

${R}_{n}\left({\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}^{\left(k\right)}\right)-\underset{f\in {\mathcal{F}}_{k}}{inf}R\left(f\right)\le {C}^{\text{'}}\sqrt{\frac{{V}_{{\mathcal{F}}_{k}}logn}{n}}$

where ${C}^{\text{'}}$ is a constant.

The end result is that

$E\left[R\left({\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}\right)\right]\le \underset{k\ge 1}{min}\left\{\underset{f\in {\mathcal{F}}_{k}}{min},R,\left(f\right),+,16,\sqrt{\frac{{V}_{{\mathcal{F}}_{k}}logn+4}{2n}}\right\}$

analogous to our pervious complexity regularization results, except thatcodelengths are replaced by VC dimensions.

In order to prove the result we use the VC probability concentration bound and assume that $△={\sum }_{k\ge 1}{V}_{{\mathcal{F}}_{k}}<\infty$ . This enables a union bounding argument and leads to a risk bound of the form given above.

## Key point of vc theory

Complexity of classes depends on richness (shattering capability) relative to a set of $n$ arbitrary points. This allows us to effectively “quantize" collections of functions in a slightlydata-dependent manner.

## Application to trees

Let

${\mathcal{F}}_{k}=\left\{k,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},l,e,a,f,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},d,e,c,i,s,i,o,n,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},t,r,e,e,s,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},i,n,\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}},{\mathbf{R}}^{d}\right\},\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{V}_{{\mathcal{F}}_{k}}\le \left(d+1\right)\left(k+1\right)$
${\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}^{\left(k\right)}=arg\underset{f\in {\mathcal{F}}_{k}}{min}{\stackrel{^}{R}}_{n}\left(f\right)$
$\stackrel{^}{k}=arg\underset{k\ge 1}{min}\left(\underset{f\in {\mathcal{F}}_{k}}{min},R,\left(f\right),+,\sqrt{\frac{32\left(d+1\right)\left(k-1\right)\left(logn+1\right)}{n}}\right)$

Then

${\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}={\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}^{\left(\stackrel{^}{k}\right)}$

satisfies

$E\left[R\left({\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}\right)\right]\le \underset{k\ge 1}{min}\left(\underset{f\in {\mathcal{F}}_{k}}{min},R,\left(f\right),+,16,\sqrt{\frac{\left(d+1\right)\left(k-1\right)logn+4}{2n}}\right)$

compare with

$E\left[R\left({\stackrel{^}{f}}_{n}\right)\right]\le \underset{k\ge 1}{min}\left(\underset{f\in dyadic\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}k\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}leaf\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}trees}{min},R,\left(f\right),+,\sqrt{\frac{\left(3k-1\right)log2+\frac{1}{2}logn}{2n}}\right)$

from Lecture 11 .

How we are making nano material?
what is a peer
What is meant by 'nano scale'?
What is STMs full form?
LITNING
scanning tunneling microscope
Sahil
what is Nano technology ?
write examples of Nano molecule?
Bob
The nanotechnology is as new science, to scale nanometric
brayan
nanotechnology is the study, desing, synthesis, manipulation and application of materials and functional systems through control of matter at nanoscale
Damian
Is there any normative that regulates the use of silver nanoparticles?
what king of growth are you checking .?
Renato
What fields keep nano created devices from performing or assimulating ? Magnetic fields ? Are do they assimilate ?
why we need to study biomolecules, molecular biology in nanotechnology?
?
Kyle
yes I'm doing my masters in nanotechnology, we are being studying all these domains as well..
why?
what school?
Kyle
biomolecules are e building blocks of every organics and inorganic materials.
Joe
anyone know any internet site where one can find nanotechnology papers?
research.net
kanaga
sciencedirect big data base
Ernesto
Introduction about quantum dots in nanotechnology
what does nano mean?
nano basically means 10^(-9). nanometer is a unit to measure length.
Bharti
do you think it's worthwhile in the long term to study the effects and possibilities of nanotechnology on viral treatment?
absolutely yes
Daniel
how to know photocatalytic properties of tio2 nanoparticles...what to do now
it is a goid question and i want to know the answer as well
Maciej
Abigail
for teaching engĺish at school how nano technology help us
Anassong
How can I make nanorobot?
Lily
Do somebody tell me a best nano engineering book for beginners?
there is no specific books for beginners but there is book called principle of nanotechnology
NANO
how can I make nanorobot?
Lily
what is fullerene does it is used to make bukky balls
are you nano engineer ?
s.
fullerene is a bucky ball aka Carbon 60 molecule. It was name by the architect Fuller. He design the geodesic dome. it resembles a soccer ball.
Tarell
what is the actual application of fullerenes nowadays?
Damian
That is a great question Damian. best way to answer that question is to Google it. there are hundreds of applications for buck minister fullerenes, from medical to aerospace. you can also find plenty of research papers that will give you great detail on the potential applications of fullerenes.
Tarell
what is the Synthesis, properties,and applications of carbon nano chemistry
Mostly, they use nano carbon for electronics and for materials to be strengthened.
Virgil
is Bucky paper clear?
CYNTHIA
carbon nanotubes has various application in fuel cells membrane, current research on cancer drug,and in electronics MEMS and NEMS etc
NANO
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers! By Subramanian Divya         By