<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Summary

Educational administration has struggled to find legitimacy and relevancy as a field for most of the last one hundred years. The problem was that relevancy was debated around the limits of a university-based pre-service curriculum. It was within the roles of teacher, principal, and superintendent that the skills, abilities, and knowledge, were acknowledged and practiced. That is, the profession long recognized a set of skills and competencies for educational leadership that integrated knowledge utilized in performing one’s role after graduating with a degree from the university.

During the latest reform movement the importance of highly trained and competent educational leaders became all too evident to the school districts seeking higher levels of student performance. School districts quickly recognized that training for improved student learning was a necessary requirement for educational leaders charged with making educational improvement. Appropriate training throughout one’s career is the missing component of educational administration that, in fact, complements the university-based pre-service program of preparation. The field of educational administration must recognize that educational leadership preparation spans a career.

The dynamic environment associated with leading an educational organization demands a lifetime of learning. More importantly, all educators must recognize this environment as a demanding venue that requires professional development over the course of a career. One can no longer expect a school administrator to know or understand all of the complexity associated with leading an educational organization upon completion of a university-based preparation program in educational administration. Educational administration has become a profession of complexity that requires depth of study and continuous learning throughout one’s professional career.

References

Broad Foundation.The broad residency in urban education. Retrieved September 5, 2008 from (External Link)

Cole, N. M. (Winter, 1957). The licensing of schoolmasters in colonial Massachusetts. History of Education Journal, 8(2), 68-74.

Darling-Hammond, L. Lapointe, M., Meyerson, D.&Orr, M. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.

Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, CC: Albert Shanker Institute.

Gates Foundation. U.S. partners in learning. Retrieved September 5, 2008 from (External Link) .

Gousha, R. P., LoPresti, P. L.,&Jones, A. H. (1988). Report on the first annual survey certification and employment standards for educational administrators. In D. E. Griffiths, R. T Stout,&P. B. Forsyth (Eds.), Leaders for America’s schools (pp. 200-206). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Grogan, M.&Andrews, R. (2003). Defining preparation and professional development in the future. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38 (2), 233-256.

Howsam, R. B.&Morphet, E. L. (March, 1958). Certification of educational administrators, The Journal of Teacher Education, IX(1), 75-96.

IL-SAELP (Illinois State Action for Educational Leadership Project. An advanced certification structure to improve student achievement. Retrieved March 10, 2008 from www.coe.ilstu.edu/eafdept/centerforedpolicy .

Leithwood, K., Louis, K.S., Anderson, S., and Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. A Report Commissioned by the Wallace Foundation. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.

Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Levine, A. Educating school leaders. Washington, D.C. EducationSchools Project. Retrieved September 5, 2008 from (External Link) .

Marzano, R. J.,&Waters, T. (2007). School district leadership that works: The effect of the superintendent leadership on student achievement. A working paper available at http://www.mcrel.org/topics/Leadership.

Marzano, R. J., Waters, T.,&McNulty, B. A. (2005). School Leadership That Works: From Research to Results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

NCSL Task Force on School Leadership (2002). The role of school leadership in improving student achievement. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures.

National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2001). Recognizing and encouraging exemplary leadership in America’s schools: A proposal to establish a system of advanced certification for administrators. Arlington, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.

Reeves, D. (2006). The learning leader. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., and Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.

Wallace Foundation. State Action for Educational Leadership Project. Retrieved, September, 5, 2008 from (External Link) .

Waters, T.&Grubb, S. (2004). The leadership we need: Using research to strengthen the use of standards for administrator preparation and licensure programs. Aurora, CO: McRel.

Woellner, R. C. (June, 1949). Teacher certification. Review of Educational Research, 19(3), 250-253.

Russell, J. E. (January, 1919). Teachers College Record, XX(1), 276.

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Mentorship for teacher leaders. OpenStax CNX. Dec 22, 2008 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10622/1.3
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Mentorship for teacher leaders' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask