<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Under these conditions, the rise in capital’s share in income will yield a growing gap between (r) and (g). Over time this will result in greater income flowing into the hands of capital owners and will increase their wealth. Their steadily growing wealth, coupled with high returns on capital and slow overall economic growth will exacerbate inequality in the distribution of wealth and income.

Alt text needed

The projected increasing gap, between (r) and (g) is not the only factor, according to Piketty, that has led to growing concentration of wealth among the top decile since 1970 in the U.S. He cites another reason: sharply increased “supersalaries” for the “working rich”, primarily Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of American publicly-owned firms.

Piketty and Piketty and Saez (2014) Piketty&Saez (2014), p.842. attribute very rapid growth of CEO salaries in large financial and non-financial firms to weakening governance of U.S. business firms. The argument is that Boards of Directors have become too timid to resist extravagant salary demands of CEOs. However, Piketty and Piketty and Saez offer but limited empirical support for this assertion. A detailed critique of the principal claims made by Piketty (and others may be found in the Appendix to this Chapter).

Sources of rising inequality: developed nations

Five likely causes of growing inequality not cited prominently by Piketty include:

  1. Globalization
  2. The nature of technological change since 1970
  3. The join effects of globalization and technological change leading to a decline in labor share in NI
  4. Deterioration of the quality of public education K-12 (primarily in the U.S.)
  5. Sociological factors, including (a) the rapid growth of families headed by a single parent, and (b) the growing share of the labor force with limited proficiency in the English language.

  1. Globalization

    The growth of international trade and the growing interdependence between nations in goods and services markets as well as financial markets has clearly benefited emerging nations as a group. However the recent pattern of trade that has emerged: rapidly rising exports from emerging nations to developed nations, has adversely affected industries in the U.S. and Europe especially those that are relatively labor intensive, using simpler technologies.

    Alt text needed

    The effects of globalization on income distribution has been extensively researched by the World Bank, among other institutions. One Bank report indicates that globalization has increased income growth among lower and middle-income people in the developed nations of the West, while it has greatly benefited large numbers of people from the lowest deciles of the income distribution up to the 70th percentage especially in the mid-range of the income distribution (see Figure 4-3).

    Another study by Branko Milankovic arrives at essentially the same conclusion. He estimated changes in per capita real income between 1988 and 2008. He found that while the income of the world’s richest did rise sharply, the greatest beneficiaries worldwide were individuals in the middle of the income distribution: the emerging middle classes in such nations as China, India and Indonesia. Nevertheless, inequality has indeed been rising within nations in both emerging and developed nations. Branko Milankovic, (2013, May), “Global Income Inequality in Numbers: in history and now”, Global Policy, 10: 124-133.

  2. Technological Change Itself

    Technological change in the past 20 years has tended to make some occupations in the U.S. and Europe redundant. At the same time, demand for high-skilled workers has expanded rapidly. In the U.S. and Europe demand for low-skill labor has diminished leading to higher unemployment of lower and middle-income workers. Unfortunately the best way to increase income inequality is to have a growing number of people with zero income (i.e. a growing number of unemployed).

    Technological change has surely been a factor in rising inequality. The benefits of technological change in recent years have not been evenly shared among work forces around the world. However, previous episodes of rapid technology change did not result in higher inequality in the U.S., at least. (Example: the electrification boom in 1920s in the U.S.).

  3. The Joint Effects of Globalization and Technological Change on the Evolution of Labor’s Share in NI.
  4. Slowing Down in Growth of the Educational Attainment of the Young

    Whether inequality increases or not can depend on the result on an ongoing race between education and technology. Especially in the U.S., declining educational attainment, relative to technological change, has played a role. According to one authoritative source, fewer jobs available at good wages have become increasingly unavailable for workers who lack advanced education. See Claudia Goldin&Lawrence Katz, (2010), The Race Between Education and Technology, Cambridge, MA: Belkna Press of Harvard University Press.

    By the 1970s the U.S. was not only the richest nation on earth, it also had, by any measure, the most educated population. Income inequality in the U.S. then was little different from Europe. Only in the mid-70s, did things begin to change. Productivity growth stalled in the U.S. Income inequality started growing slowly at first, then at a faster pace. By 2012, the gulf between the richest 1% persons and the rest of the U.S. was the widest since 1928. The top 10% earned 19% of household incomes. And the top 10% captured 48% of total earnings in 2012. That the gap between the very rich and the poor has been widening is beyond dispute.

    What might have been the roles of economic factors such as of technology and declining quality of public education K-12 in contributing to growing inequality in the U.S? Two economists, Claudia Goldin and Lawrence Katz, both at Harvard, recently concluded that in the race between education and technology, education was winning the race for most of the 20th century, up to about 1975. Ibid. But since then, the rate of change in technology doubtless overtook the rate of improvement in education quality, specifically in public education K-12, not in higher education. The slowdown in educational attainment is apparent by whatever standard employed. A commonly used standard is the results of the “gold standard” of international testing. Even as early as 1995, the Third International Math and Science Study (TIMSS) clearly indicated that the U.S. was far behind other nations in twelfth grade math and science. By 2012, the U.S. scores student assessment for math were but 481, far below South Korea (554) Finland (519) and Australia (504). Source: OECD, Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012, (Paris, 2012). Clearly the U.S. no longer leads the world in the education of young adults. The results of the recent rise between technology and education in the U.S. is evident from the observed shortages of skilled workers not only in such industries as information technology, biotechnology and information technology, but in building construction oil and gas exploration and developing as well as skilled electricians and plumbers.

    The decline in educational quality in grades K-12 has not been due to lack of funding. The United States spends more of public money, in both absolute and per pupil terms on school-age children than any other nation. The outlay per pupil in 2013 was more than $13,000 per year in the U.S. This is one and a half times the average for all rich nations. “Choose Your Parents Wisely,” The Economist , July 26, 2014. Moreover, teachers’ salaries in the U.S. are on a par with (or in excess of) such countries as Finland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Australia, Britain and France. But while the U.S. is 19th in an international efficiency index, Finland, Czech Republic, Hungary and Australia are in the first ten in the index, and Britain and France are 11th and 12th.

    The former State Superintendent of Schools in New York, Marc Bernstein, notes that only 1% of the State’s teachers receive valuation of “ineffective”. But in the 2013-14 school year, more than half of students in grades 4-8 were not proficient in either reading or math. Marc F. Bernstein (2014, September 30), “Where All the Teachers are Above Average”, Wall Street Journal .

    There are other indicators of inadequacies in public education K-12. The former Mayor of Los Angeles (and also a former organizer for the United Teachers of Los Angeles) maintains that more than half the young people attending community colleges need to retake high school classes because the education they received was not vigorous enough. Antonio Villaraigosa (2010, July 21), “Why are Teachers Unions So Opposed to Change?” Wall Street Journal . More generally the number of all undergraduate students taking at least one remedial course rose from 1 million in 1999 to 2.7 million in 2011.

    The decline in quality of the U.S. education system K-12 has also contributed to the recent fall in the competitiveness See Michael Porter&Jan Rivkin, __________________ of the U.S., since the 1995 study cited by Goldin and Katz. In a list compiled by Professor Michael Porter and colleagues of the 30 nations with the highest index of international competitiveness, the U.S. ranked 20th, whereas all the top seven nations in the competitiveness rankings have by whatever measures employed more effective systems of public education K-12. Sweden, Switzerland, Finland, Netherlands, Denmark, Singapore and Norway. See Robert J. Barro&Jong-Wha Lee (2000, April), “International Data on Educational Assessment” CID Working Paper #42, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    At the same time as rapid technological change has sharply increased the demand for skilled workers, the decline in quality of graduates of the U.S. K-12 systems has clearly not allowed the supply of needed, well trained workers to increase as fast as the rate of technological change. In such circumstances, firms begin bidding up the wages of the most skilled workers. But the poorly trained and educated have been losing ground, and economic inequality has thereby worsened, especially for the poorest 10%.

    On the other hand, educational outcomes in the great majority of emerging nations have been steadily, if unevenly, improving, especially since 1985. These improvements are especially evident for literacy rates. Adult literacy rates for developing nations as a whole rose sharply from 60% of the adult population (those 15 years and over) to 72% in low income nations and fully 90% in middle income emerging nations. For 1985, see World Bank, Human Development Report 1991 , Washington, DC: World Bank. For 2007, see World Bank World Development Indicators 2009 , Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Female literacy rates were substantially lower than for males in 1985 (66%). By 2007, the female rate rose to 76% of the male rate in the poorest nations and to 89% in middle income nations, reflecting gradually growing educational opportunities for women. An important reason for the climb in literacy rates in emerging nations was ongoing and widespread increase in years of schooling especially after 2003, with the single exception of war-town Afghanistan (World Development Report 2013).

    However even there, levels of educational attainment in reading, mathematics and science have in general not risen as fast as gains in years of schooling and literacy, at least for the 25-odd emerging nations for which data on these indicators are available. Exceptions include Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, and Tunisia. World Bank, World Development Report 2013 , Figure 4-2.

    Still the recent economic record suggests that, contrary to the experience of the United States, deterioration in the effectiveness of primary and secondary education in emerging nations has not contributed to income inequality; rather, improving educational outcomes have most likely reduced income inequality.

  5. Sociological Factors: The Decline of Families and the Fall in English Language Proficiency

    Among the important sociological factors contributing to growth in income inequality in recent decades has been the decline in two-parent households and the sharp rise in the proportion of U.S. families headed by a single parent, usually a mother. In 1964 93% of births occurred in families headed by two parents; only 7% of children were born to single mothers. The Heritage Foundation, Special Report #117 on Poverty and Inequality, September 2012. By 2012, the percentage of children born to single mothers increased to 29% for Caucasian families, 53% for Hispanics and 72% for African-Americans.

    In families headed by married couples, only 7.5% had incomes below the 2012 poverty levels. But 34% of families headed by a single mother had incomes below the poverty level. Moreover 45% of children living only with their mother are in a household receiving food stamps, a clear mark of poverty. Jonathan Vespa, Jamie M. Lewis&Rose M. Kreider, (2013, August), “America’s Families and Living Arrangements: 2012”, U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p20-570.pdf. Rapid growth in the number of these families has obvious effects on income distribution, as it significantly reduces the share of the lowest decile in income.

    Growing lack of English language proficiency has clearly contributed to growth in inequality in the U.S. According to a 2013 study by the Washington-based think tank, the Brookings Institution, nearly one tenth (9.3%) of working-age adults had limited proficiency. This is 2.5 times as many as in 1980. Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution (2014, September 24), Limited English Proficient Workers More Productive with Increased Investment in English . Most of the 19.2 million people with limited English in 2013 were Spanish speakers, mostly immigrants from Mexico, Honduras, El Salvador and other Latin American nations.

    Clearly lack of English proficiency does not preclude immigrant workers from finding jobs. But it does prevent them from holding higher-paying jobs. The share of the immigrant population in the U.S. labor force grew from 7% in 1980 to 16% in 2012. As long as limited English proficiency remains widespread among immigrants, income inequality rising from their source will likely increase over the coming years. Earlier in this chapter we observed that contrary to recent experience in the U.S., France and Britain, income inequality in emerging nations has generally moved toward less inequality. This has been particularly so in one region long noted for extremes in income distribution: Latin America. According to the Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA), of the 18 countries there for which data exists, income inequality narrowed in 16 nations from 2002-08. United Nations, Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA) , (Santiago, Chile, 2011).

    In addition, Latin American poor have generally been doing much better since 1990 because of rapid recent economic growth. In that year, 48.4% of the region’s population lived below national poverty lines (income insufficient to cover basic food needs). But by 2010, only 30.4% of the people in the region lived below their nation’s respective poverty lines. Ibid.

    We have seen that income distribution in most emerging nations generally has moved forward less inequality. However, some of the reasons for rising inequality in the U.S. and Europe since 1975 may eventually become significant in some emerging nations.

    As noted earlier recent globalization has redounded to low and middle income households benefit of lower and middle income nations (see Chapter 3, Figure ___). But these and other gains from globalization cannot go on forever. International trade has already expanded to 27% of world GDP even by 1992, well beyond what would have been expected only 25 years ago. So sooner or later the income distribution gains to emerging nations from international trade (see again Figure 4-3) will be largely exhausted.

    At the same time, technological advances may increasingly displace labor not only in rich but in poor nations (see Chapter 7-A). Both these factors – possible declining benefits from globalization and the shape of future technological change could erode much of the gains in income equality in emerging nations over the coming years.

Questions & Answers

how can chip be made from sand
Eke Reply
is this allso about nanoscale material
Almas
are nano particles real
Missy Reply
yeah
Joseph
Hello, if I study Physics teacher in bachelor, can I study Nanotechnology in master?
Lale Reply
no can't
Lohitha
where is the latest information on a no technology how can I find it
William
currently
William
where we get a research paper on Nano chemistry....?
Maira Reply
nanopartical of organic/inorganic / physical chemistry , pdf / thesis / review
Ali
what are the products of Nano chemistry?
Maira Reply
There are lots of products of nano chemistry... Like nano coatings.....carbon fiber.. And lots of others..
learn
Even nanotechnology is pretty much all about chemistry... Its the chemistry on quantum or atomic level
learn
Google
da
no nanotechnology is also a part of physics and maths it requires angle formulas and some pressure regarding concepts
Bhagvanji
hey
Giriraj
Preparation and Applications of Nanomaterial for Drug Delivery
Hafiz Reply
revolt
da
Application of nanotechnology in medicine
has a lot of application modern world
Kamaluddeen
yes
narayan
what is variations in raman spectra for nanomaterials
Jyoti Reply
ya I also want to know the raman spectra
Bhagvanji
I only see partial conversation and what's the question here!
Crow Reply
what about nanotechnology for water purification
RAW Reply
please someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think one can use nanoparticles, specially silver nanoparticles for water treatment.
Damian
yes that's correct
Professor
I think
Professor
Nasa has use it in the 60's, copper as water purification in the moon travel.
Alexandre
nanocopper obvius
Alexandre
what is the stm
Brian Reply
is there industrial application of fullrenes. What is the method to prepare fullrene on large scale.?
Rafiq
industrial application...? mmm I think on the medical side as drug carrier, but you should go deeper on your research, I may be wrong
Damian
How we are making nano material?
LITNING Reply
what is a peer
LITNING Reply
What is meant by 'nano scale'?
LITNING Reply
What is STMs full form?
LITNING
scanning tunneling microscope
Sahil
how nano science is used for hydrophobicity
Santosh
Do u think that Graphene and Fullrene fiber can be used to make Air Plane body structure the lightest and strongest. Rafiq
Rafiq
what is differents between GO and RGO?
Mahi
what is simplest way to understand the applications of nano robots used to detect the cancer affected cell of human body.? How this robot is carried to required site of body cell.? what will be the carrier material and how can be detected that correct delivery of drug is done Rafiq
Rafiq
if virus is killing to make ARTIFICIAL DNA OF GRAPHENE FOR KILLED THE VIRUS .THIS IS OUR ASSUMPTION
Anam
analytical skills graphene is prepared to kill any type viruses .
Anam
Any one who tell me about Preparation and application of Nanomaterial for drug Delivery
Hafiz
what is Nano technology ?
Bob Reply
write examples of Nano molecule?
Bob
The nanotechnology is as new science, to scale nanometric
brayan
nanotechnology is the study, desing, synthesis, manipulation and application of materials and functional systems through control of matter at nanoscale
Damian
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Economic development for the 21st century. OpenStax CNX. Jun 05, 2015 Download for free at http://legacy.cnx.org/content/col11747/1.12
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Economic development for the 21st century' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask