# 0.4 6.5 elastic collisions in one dimension  (Page 2/4)

 Page 2 / 4

Solution

For this problem, note that ${v}_{2}=0$ and use conservation of momentum. Thus,

${p}_{1}=p\prime {}_{1}+p\prime {}_{2}$

or

${m}_{1}{v}_{1}={m}_{1}{v\prime }_{1}+{m}_{2}{v\prime }_{2}.$

Using conservation of internal kinetic energy and that ${v}_{2}=0$ ,

$\frac{1}{2}{m}_{1}{{v}_{1}}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}{m}_{1}{v\prime }_{1}{}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}{m}_{2}{v\prime }_{2}{}^{2}.$

Solving the first equation (momentum equation) for ${v\prime }_{2}$ , we obtain

${v\prime }_{2}=\frac{{m}_{1}}{{m}_{2}}\left({v}_{1}-{v\prime }_{1}\right).$

Substituting this expression into the second equation (internal kinetic energy equation) eliminates the variable ${v\prime }_{2}$ , leaving only ${v\prime }_{1}$ as an unknown (the algebra is left as an exercise for the reader). There are two solutions to any quadratic equation; in this example, they are

${v\prime }_{1}=4\text{.}\text{00 m/s}$

and

${v\prime }_{1}=-3\text{.}\text{00 m/s}.$

As noted when quadratic equations were encountered in earlier chapters, both solutions may or may not be meaningful. In this case, the first solution is the same as the initial condition. The first solution thus represents the situation before the collision and is discarded. The second solution $\left({v\prime }_{1}=-3\text{.}\text{00 m/s}\right)$ is negative, meaning that the first object bounces backward. When this negative value of ${v\prime }_{1}$ is used to find the velocity of the second object after the collision, we get

${v\prime }_{2}=\frac{{m}_{1}}{{m}_{2}}\left({v}_{1}-{v\prime }_{1}\right)=\frac{0\text{.}\text{500 kg}}{3\text{.}\text{50 kg}}\left[4\text{.}\text{00}-\left(-3\text{.}\text{00}\right)\right]\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{m/s}$

or

${v\prime }_{2}=1\text{.}\text{00 m/s}.$

Discussion

The result of this example is intuitively reasonable. A small object strikes a larger one at rest and bounces backward. The larger one is knocked forward, but with a low speed. (This is like a compact car bouncing backward off a full-size SUV that is initially at rest.) As a check, try calculating the internal kinetic energy before and after the collision. You will see that the internal kinetic energy is unchanged at 4.00 J. Also check the total momentum before and after the collision; you will find it, too, is unchanged.

The equations for conservation of momentum and internal kinetic energy as written above can be used to describe any one-dimensional elastic collision of two objects. These equations can be extended to more objects if needed.

## Making connections: take-home investigation—ice cubes and elastic collision

Find a few ice cubes which are about the same size and a smooth kitchen tabletop or a table with a glass top. Place the ice cubes on the surface several centimeters away from each other. Flick one ice cube toward a stationary ice cube and observe the path and velocities of the ice cubes after the collision. Try to avoid edge-on collisions and collisions with rotating ice cubes. Have you created approximately elastic collisions? Explain the speeds and directions of the ice cubes using momentum.

## Phet explorations: collision lab

Investigate collisions on an air hockey table. Set up your own experiments: vary the number of discs, masses and initial conditions. Is momentum conserved? Is kinetic energy conserved? Vary the elasticity and see what happens.

## Section summary

• An elastic collision is one that conserves internal kinetic energy.
• Conservation of kinetic energy and momentum together allow the final velocities to be calculated in terms of initial velocities and masses in one dimensional two-body collisions.

## Conceptual questions

What is an elastic collision?

## Problems&Exercises

Two identical objects (such as billiard balls) have a one-dimensional collision in which one is initially motionless. After the collision, the moving object is stationary and the other moves with the same speed as the other originally had. Show that both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved.

Professional Application

Two manned satellites approach one another at a relative speed of 0.250 m/s, intending to dock. The first has a mass of $4\text{.}\text{00}×{\text{10}}^{3}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{kg}$ , and the second a mass of $7\text{.}\text{50}×{\text{10}}^{3}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{kg}$ . If the two satellites collide elastically rather than dock, what is their final relative velocity?

0.250 m/s

A 70.0-kg ice hockey goalie, originally at rest, catches a 0.150-kg hockey puck slapped at him at a velocity of 35.0 m/s. Suppose the goalie and the ice puck have an elastic collision and the puck is reflected back in the direction from which it came. What would their final velocities be in this case?

participants in market
do the negative slope of production possibility curve sloped to show trade offs in production of two goods?
how is economics not a science subject
i need the main definition of economics
according to professor Richard lipsey economics is a social science that concerns with the way society has employ scarce productive resources in other to achieve a certain conditions of living
Confidence
what does it mean to say that market equilibrium is stable?
what is the practical significance of cross price elasticity of demand?
Ayesha
what is economic
what is the practical significance of cross price elasticity of demand?
Ayesha
economics is a social science that deals with human behaviour relating with end and scares means
Okafor
according to working definition of economics by professor Richard lipsey economics is a social science that concerns with the way society has choice to employ scarce productive resources in other to achieve a certain living conditions
Confidence
why is economics not a pure science?
it is not a pure science because it only studies human behavior
Ayaane
economics is a social science cause it is relating to ends and scares means🙂
Okafor
economics is not a pure science because it studies about human behaviour scarcity want and needs of human beings and the critical thinking of human beings it can be said not to be a pure science because it cannot be manipulated because you don't know humans minds, humans minds are unpredictable
Confidence
economics is not a pure science because it studies about human behavior scarcity want and needs of human being .and the critical thinking of human being. last science can be manipulated but economics cannot because you don't know humans minds, humans min
Confidence
what is management of human resources?
how is economics a science?
economics is not a science subject either is a social science subject
Okafor
hmmm what do u mean
Confidence
4. It is a hot day, and Bert is thirsty. Here is the value he places on each bottle of water: Value of first bottle $7 Value of second bottle$5 Value of third bottle $3 Value of fourth bottle$1 a. From this information, derive Bert’s demand schedule. Graph his demand curve for bottled w
hello
Lukman
what is the law of diminishing marginal utility
The law of diminishing marginal utility state that as a consumer consumes a successive units of a commodity, a point is eventually reached where consumption of additional unit yields less satisfaction.
raheem
what is demand
other things can be equal an certain amount paid for the goods by consumer in the market called demand.
Dhanishhwar
demand is the amount of a commodity a consumer is willing and able buy at a given price at a particular point in time
Samuel
Demand is the quantity of commodity a consumer is willing and able to buy at a given price and a particular time.
raheem
demand can be defined as the willingness and ability of a consumer to purchase goods or services at a given price in a particular time
Confidence
what is economics
economics is a social science subject, which study human behaviors as a relationship btw end ND scarce means
Joseph
what utility
Isatu
Utility is the satisfaction a consumer derives from consuming a particular commodity.
raheem
meaning of economics
what is a columnist
Owusu
what are the four basic assumptions of perfect competition
(a) Find the recoil velocity of a 70.0-kg ice hockey goalie, originally at rest, who catches a 0.150-kg hockey puck slapped at him at a velocity of 35.0 m/s. (b) How much kinetic energy is lost during the collision? Assume friction between the ice and the puck-goalie system is negligible. (Figure 8.9)
Calculate the velocities of two objects following an elastic collision, given that m1 = 0.500 kg, m2 = 3.50 kg, v1 = 4.00 m/s, and v2 = 0.