<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Finally, principals took the neutral position on whether high stakes testing motivates students to achieve. However, principals reported that students might cheat to improve their test scores and that high stakes testing contributed to students dropping out of school.

References

Airasian, P. W. (1988). Symbolic validation: The case of state-mandated, high stakes testing Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 10 (4), 310-313.

Afflerbach, P. (2005). National reading conference policy brief: High stakes testing and reading assessment. Journal of Literacy Research, 37 , 151-163.

Baines, L. A.,&Stanley, G. K. (2004). High stakes hustle: Public schools and the new billion dollar accountability. The Educational Forum, 69 (1), 8-16.

Brockmeier, L. L. Pate, J. L.,&Leech, D. W. (2008, February). Psychometric characteristics of the principal’s high stakes testing survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeast Evaluation Association, Tallahassee, Florida.

Burton, N. W. (1978). Societal standards. Journal of Educational Measurement , 15 , 263 – 271.

Camilli G., Cizek, G. J.,&Lugg, C. A. (2001). Psychometric theory and the validation of performance standards: History, and future perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 445 – 475). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Chrispeels, J. (2004). Learning to lead together: The promise and challenge of sharing leadership . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cizek, G. J. (2001). Conjectures on the rise and call of standard setting: An introduction to context and practice. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M.,&Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study- Developing successful principals. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from the Wallace Foundation website: http://www.wallacefoundation.org/WF.

Driesler, S. D. (2001). Whiplash about backlash. The truth about public support for testing. NCME Newsletter , 9 (3), 2 – 5.

Fremer, J. (2005). Foreword. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Engelhart, M. D. (1950). Examinations. In W. S. Monroe (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 407-414). New York: Macmillan.

Hamilton, L. (2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education , 27 , 25-68.

Holland, R. (2001). Indispensible tests: How a value-added approach to school testing could identify and bolster exceptional teaching . Arlington, VA: Lexington Institute.

Hope, W. C., Brockmeier, L. L., Lutfi, G. A.,&Sermon, J. M. (2007, January). High stakes tests influence on principals’ beliefs . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeast Evaluation Association, Tallahassee, FL.

Kaback, S. (2006). High stakes are for tomatoes: Supporting teachers and students when the growing conditions are poor. Kappa Delta Pi, 42 , 101-103.

Lederman, L. M.,&Burnstein, R. A. (2007). Alternative approaches to high stakes testing. Phi Delta Kappan, 87 (6), 429-432.

Leithwood, K, Louis, K. S., Anderson, S.,&Wahlstrom, K (2004). How leadership influences learning . New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.

Linn, R. L., Miller, M. D.,&Gronlund, N. E. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching 9 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Lyons, J. E.,&Algozzine, B. (2006). Perceptions of the impact of accountability on the role of principals. Education Policy Analysis Archives , 14 (16), Retrieved February 7, 2007, from http://epaa.sau.edu/v14n16/.

Phelps, R. P. (2003). Kill the messenger: The war on standardized testing . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Phelps, R. P. (2005). Forty years of public opinion. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Popham, W. J. (1978). As always, provocative. Journal of Educational Measurement , 15 , 297 -300.

Resnick, D. (1982). History of educational testing. In A. K. Wigdor&W. R. Garner (Eds.) Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies (pp.173-194). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ross, J. A.,&Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education , 29 (3), 798-822.

Scherer, M. (2005). Reclaiming testing. Educational Leadership, 63 , 9.

Stone, J. E. (2003). Preface. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Kill the messenger: The war on standardized testing . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Tyack, D. (1974 ). The one best system: A history of American urban education . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wahlberg, H. J. (2003). Foreword. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Kill the messenger: The war on standardized testing . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Zellner, L.,&Jinkins, D. (2001, December). Consequence of high stakes testing on literary programs of high performing learning communities . Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.

Questions & Answers

what is biology
Hajah Reply
the study of living organisms and their interactions with one another and their environments
AI-Robot
what is biology
Victoria Reply
HOW CAN MAN ORGAN FUNCTION
Alfred Reply
the diagram of the digestive system
Assiatu Reply
allimentary cannel
Ogenrwot
How does twins formed
William Reply
They formed in two ways first when one sperm and one egg are splited by mitosis or two sperm and two eggs join together
Oluwatobi
what is genetics
Josephine Reply
Genetics is the study of heredity
Misack
how does twins formed?
Misack
What is manual
Hassan Reply
discuss biological phenomenon and provide pieces of evidence to show that it was responsible for the formation of eukaryotic organelles
Joseph Reply
what is biology
Yousuf Reply
the study of living organisms and their interactions with one another and their environment.
Wine
discuss the biological phenomenon and provide pieces of evidence to show that it was responsible for the formation of eukaryotic organelles in an essay form
Joseph Reply
what is the blood cells
Shaker Reply
list any five characteristics of the blood cells
Shaker
lack electricity and its more savely than electronic microscope because its naturally by using of light
Abdullahi Reply
advantage of electronic microscope is easily and clearly while disadvantage is dangerous because its electronic. advantage of light microscope is savely and naturally by sun while disadvantage is not easily,means its not sharp and not clear
Abdullahi
cell theory state that every organisms composed of one or more cell,cell is the basic unit of life
Abdullahi
is like gone fail us
DENG
cells is the basic structure and functions of all living things
Ramadan
What is classification
ISCONT Reply
is organisms that are similar into groups called tara
Yamosa
in what situation (s) would be the use of a scanning electron microscope be ideal and why?
Kenna Reply
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is ideal for situations requiring high-resolution imaging of surfaces. It is commonly used in materials science, biology, and geology to examine the topography and composition of samples at a nanoscale level. SEM is particularly useful for studying fine details,
Hilary
cell is the building block of life.
Condoleezza Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Education leadership review, volume 12, number 1 (april 2011). OpenStax CNX. Mar 26, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11285/1.2
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Education leadership review, volume 12, number 1 (april 2011)' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask