<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
The following is an example of how to write up (in manuscript text) your Chi-Square statistics. This module is used with a larger Collection (Book) authored by John R. Slate and Ana Rojas-LeBouef from Sam Houston State University and available at: Calculating Basic Statistical Procedures in SPSS: A Self-Help and Practical Guide to Preparing Theses, Dissertations, and Manuscripts
Gender Differences in Reading Group Membership
The following research question was addressed in this investigation: What is the difference between boys and girls in their reading group membership?
To ascertain whether a difference was present in reading group membership (i.e., Excellent, Good, Extremely Poor) between boys and girls, a Pearson chi-square was conducted. This statistical procedure was viewed as the optimal statistical procedure to use because frequency data were present for reading group membership and for gender. As such, chi-squares are the statistical procedure of choice when both variables are categorical. In addition, with the large sample size, the available sample size per cell was more than five. Therefore, the assumptions for utilizing a chi-square were met.
For this research question in which the focus was placed on reading group membership between boys and girls, the result was statistically significant, χ 2 (2) = 122.86, p <.001. The effect size for this finding, Cramer’s V , was moderate, .32 (Cohen, 1988). As can be seen in Table 1, 47.30% of the girls were in the Excellent Reader group, compared to only 21.4% of the boys. Most of the boys were in the Extremely Poor Reader group, 57.40%, compared to only 27.30% of the girls.
Reading Group | Girls n and %ageof Total | Boys n and %ageof Total |
Excellent Reader | 47.30% ( n = 279) | 21.40% ( n = 126) |
Good Reader | 25.40% ( n = 150) | 21.20% ( n = 125) |
Extremely Poor Reader | 27.30% ( n = 161) | 57.40% ( n = 338) |
Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
Pearson Chi-Square | 122.856 a | 2 | .000 |
Likelihood ratio | 125.706 | 2 | .000 |
Linear-by-Linear Association | 121.427 | 1 | .000 |
N of Valid Cases | 1179 |
Value | Approx. Sig. | ||
Nominal by Nominal | Phi | .323 | .000 |
Cramer's V | .323 | .000 | |
N of Valid Cases | 1179 |
Excellent Reader | Good Reader | Extremely Poor Reader | Total | ||
Gender of Persons in Study | Boys Count | 126 | 125 | 338 | 589 |
% within Gender | 21.4% | 21.2% | 57.4% | 100% | |
Girls Count | 279 | 150 | 161 | 590 | |
% within Gender | 47.3% | 25.4% | 27.3% | 100% | |
Total | Count | 405 | 275 | 499 | 1179 |
% of total | 34.4% | 23.3% | 42.3% | 100% |
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Presenting and communicating your statistical findings: model writeups' conversation and receive update notifications?