# 1.4 Orthogonality

 Page 1 / 1
Definition of orthogonal vectors, sets, and subspaces; properties and benefits.

Recall that a set $S$ is a basis for a subspace $X$ if $\left[S\right]=X$ and $S$ has linearly independent elements. If $S$ is a basis for $X$ then each $x\in X$ is uniquely determined by $\left({a}_{1},{a}_{2},...,{a}_{n}\right)$ such that ${\sum }_{i=1}^{n}{a}_{i}{s}_{i}=x$ . In this sense, we could operate either with $x$ itself or with the vector $a=\left[{a}_{1},...{a}_{n}\right]={R}^{n}$ . One would wonder then whether particular operations can be performed with a representation $a$ instead of the original vector $x$ .

Example 1 Assume $x,y\in X$ have representations $a,b\in {R}^{n}$ in a basis for $X$ . Can we say that $〈x,,,y〉=〈a,,,b〉$ ?

For the particular example of $X={L}_{2}\left[0,1\right]$ , $S=\left\{1,t,{t}^{2}\right\}$ so that $\left[S\right]=Q$ , the set of all quadratic functions supported on $\left[0,1\right]$ . Pick $x=2+t+{t}^{2}$ and $y=1+2t+3{t}^{2}$ . One can see then that if we label ${s}_{1}=1$ , ${s}_{2}=t$ , ${s}_{3}={t}^{2}$ , then the coefficient vectors for $x$ and $y$ are $a=\left[2\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}1\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}1\right]$ and $b=\left[1\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}2\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}3\right]$ , respectively. Let us compute both inner products:

$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill 〈x,,,y〉& ={\int }_{0}^{1}x\left(t\right)y\left(t\right)dt={\int }_{0}^{1}\left(2+t+{t}^{2}\right)\left(1+2t+3{t}^{2}\right)dt=\frac{187}{20}\approx 9.35,\hfill \\ \hfill 〈a,,,b〉& =2+2+3=7.\hfill \end{array}$

Since $7\ne 9.35$ , we find that we fail to obtain the desired equivalence between vectors and their representations.

While this example was unsuccessful, simple conditions on the basis $S$ will yield this desired equivalence, plus many more useful properties.

Several definitions of orthogonality will be useful to us during the course.

Definition 1 A pair of vectors $x$ and $y$ in an inner product space are orthogonal (denoted $x\perp y$ ) if the inner product $〈x,,,y〉=0$ .

Note that 0 is immediately orthogonal to all vectors.

Definition 2 Let $X$ be an inner product space. A set of vectors $S\subseteq X$ is orthogonal if $〈x,,,y〉=0$ for all $x,y\in S,x\ne y$ .

Definition 3 Let $X$ be an inner product space. A set of vectors $S\subseteq X$ is orthonormal if $S$ is an orthogonal set and $\parallel s\parallel =\sqrt{⟨s,s⟩}=1$ for all $s\in S$ .

Definition 4 A vector $x$ in an inner product space $X$ is orthogonal to a set $S\subseteq X$ (denoted $x\perp S$ ) if $x\perp y$ for all $y\in S$ .

Definition 5 Let $X$ be an inner product space. Two sets ${S}_{1}\subseteq X$ and ${S}_{2}\subseteq X$ are orthogonal (denoted ${S}_{1}\perp {S}_{2}$ ) if $x\perp y$ for all $x\in {S}_{1}$ and $y\in {s}_{2}$ .

Definition 6 The orthogonal complement ${S}^{\perp }$ of a set $S$ is the set of all vectors that are orthogonal to $S$ .

## Benefits of orthogonality

Why is orthonormality good? For many reasons. One of them is the equivalence of inner products that we desired in a previous example. Another is that having an orthonormal basis allows us to easily find the coefficients ${a}_{1},...{a}_{n}$ of $x$ in a basis $S$ .

Example 2 Let $x\in X$ and $S$ be a basis for $X$ (i.e., $\left[S\right]=X$ ). We wish to find ${a}_{1},...{a}_{n}$ such that $x={\sum }_{i=1}^{n}{a}_{i}{s}_{i}$ . Consider the inner products

$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill 〈x,,,{s}_{i}〉& =〈\sum _{j=1}^{n},{a}_{j},{s}_{j},,,{s}_{i}〉=\sum _{j=1}^{n}{a}_{j}〈{s}_{j},,,{s}_{i}〉,\hfill \end{array}$

due to the linearity of the inner product in the first term. If $S$ is orthonormal, then we have that for $i\ne j$ $〈{s}_{j},,,{s}_{i}〉=0$ . In that case the sum above becomes

$\begin{array}{cc}\hfill 〈x,,,{s}_{i}〉& ={a}_{i}〈{s}_{i},,,{s}_{i}〉={a}_{i}{\parallel {s}_{i}\parallel }^{2}={a}_{i},\hfill \end{array}$

due to the orthonormality of $S$ . In other words, for an orthonormal basis $S$ one can find the basis coefficients as ${a}_{i}=⟨x,{s}_{i}⟩$ .

If $S$ is not orthonormal, then we can rewrite the sum above as the product of a row vector and a column vector as follows:

$〈x,,,{s}_{i}〉=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}〈{s}_{1},,,{s}_{i}〉& 〈{s}_{2},,,{s}_{i}〉& \cdots & 〈{s}_{n},,,{s}_{i}〉\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{a}_{1}\\ {a}_{2}\\ ⋮\\ {a}_{n}\end{array}\right].$

We can then stack these equations for $i=1,...,n$ to obtain the following matrix-vector multiplication:

$\underset{\beta }{\underbrace{\left[\begin{array}{c}〈x,,,{s}_{1}〉\\ 〈x,,,{s}_{2}〉\\ ⋮\\ 〈x,,,{s}_{n}〉\end{array}\right]}}=\underset{G}{\underbrace{\left[\begin{array}{cccc}〈{s}_{1},,,{s}_{1}〉& 〈{s}_{2},,,{s}_{1}〉& \cdots & 〈{s}_{n},,,{s}_{1}〉\\ 〈{s}_{1},,,{s}_{2}〉& 〈{s}_{2},,,{s}_{3}〉& \cdots & 〈{s}_{n},,,{s}_{2}〉\\ ⋮& ⋮& \ddots & ⋮\\ 〈{s}_{1},,,{s}_{n}〉& 〈{s}_{2},,,{s}_{n}〉& \cdots & 〈{s}_{n},,,{s}_{n}〉\end{array}\right]}}\underset{a}{\underbrace{\left[\begin{array}{c}{a}_{1}\\ {a}_{2}\\ ⋮\\ {a}_{n}\end{array}\right]}}.$

The nomenclature given above provides us with the matrix equation $\beta =G·a$ , where $\beta$ and $G$ have entries ${\beta }_{i}=〈x,,,{s}_{i}〉$ and ${G}_{i,j}=〈{s}_{j},,,{s}_{i}〉$ , respectively.

Definition 7 The matrix $G$ above is called the Gram matrix (or Gramian) of the set $S$ .

In the particular case of orthonormal $S$ , it is easy to see that $G=I$ , the identity matrix, and so $a=\beta$ as given earlier. For invertible Gramians $G$ , one could compute the coefficients in vector form as $a={G}^{-1}\beta$ . For square matrices (like $G$ ), invertibility is linked to singularity.

Definition 8 A singular matrix is a non-invertible square matrix. A non-singular matrix is an invertible square matrix.

Theorem 1 A matrix is singular if $G·x=0$ for some $x\ne 0$ . A matrix is non-singular if $G·x=0$ only for $x=0$ .

The link between this notion of singularity and invertibility is straightforward: if $G$ is singular, then there is some $a\ne 0$ for which $G·a=0$ . Consider the mapping $y=G·x$ ; we would also have $y=G\left(x+a\right)$ . Since $x\ne x+a$ , one cannot “invert” the mapping provided by $G$ into $y$ .

Theorem 2 $S$ is linearly independent if and only if $G$ is non-singular (i.e. $Gx=0$ if and only if $x=0$ ).

Proof: We will prove an equivalent statement: $S$ is linearly dependent if and only if $G$ is singular, i.e., if and only if there exists a vector $x\ne 0$ such that $Gx=0$ .

$\left(⇒\right)$ We first prove that if $S$ is linearly dependent then $G$ is singular. In this case there exist a set $\left\{{a}_{i}\right\}\subseteq R$ , with at least one nonzero, such that ${\sum }_{i=1}^{n}{a}_{i}{s}_{i}=0$ . We then can write $〈{\sum }_{i=1}^{n},{a}_{i},{s}_{i},,,{s}_{j}〉=⟨0,{s}_{j}⟩=0$ for each ${s}_{j}$ . Linearity allows us to take the sum and the scalar outside the inner product:

$\sum _{i=1}^{n}{a}_{i}〈{s}_{i},,,{s}_{j}〉=0.$

We can rewrite this equation in terms of the entries of the Gram matrix as ${\sum }_{i=1}^{n}{a}_{i}{G}_{ji}=0$ . This sum, in turn, can be written as the vector inner product

$\left[\begin{array}{ccc}{G}_{j1}& \cdots & {G}_{1n}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{a}_{1}\\ ⋮\\ {a}_{n}\end{array}\right]=0,$

which is true for every value of $j$ . We can therefore collect these equations into a matrix-vector product:

$\begin{array}{c}\hfill \left[\begin{array}{ccc}{G}_{11}& \cdots & {G}_{1n}\\ ⋮& \ddots & ⋮\\ {G}_{n1}& \cdots & {G}_{nn}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{c}{a}_{1}\\ ⋮\\ {a}_{n}\end{array}\right]=\left[\begin{array}{c}0\\ ⋮\\ 0\end{array}\right].\end{array}$

Therefore we have found a nonzero vector $a$ for which $Ga=0$ , and therefore $G$ is singular. Since all statements here are equalities, we can backtrack to prove the opposite direction of the theorem $\left(⇐\right)$ .

## Pythagorean theorem

There are still more nice proper ties for orthogonal sets of vectors. The next one has well-known geometric applications.

Theorem 3 (Pythagorean theorem) If $x$ and $y$ are orthogonal ( $x\perp y$ ), then ${\parallel x\parallel }^{2}+{\parallel y\parallel }^{2}={\parallel x+y\parallel }^{2}$ .

Proof:

${\parallel x+y\parallel }^{2}=⟨x+y,x+y⟩=⟨x,x⟩+⟨x,y⟩+⟨y,x⟩+⟨y,y⟩$

Because $x$ and $y$ are orthogonal, $⟨x,y⟩=⟨y,x⟩=0$ and we are left with $⟨x,x⟩={\parallel x\parallel }^{2}$ and $⟨y,y⟩={\parallel y\parallel }^{2}$ . Thus: ${\parallel x+y\parallel }^{2}={\parallel x\parallel }^{2}+{\parallel y\parallel }^{2}.$

what is the stm
is there industrial application of fullrenes. What is the method to prepare fullrene on large scale.?
Rafiq
industrial application...? mmm I think on the medical side as drug carrier, but you should go deeper on your research, I may be wrong
Damian
How we are making nano material?
what is a peer
What is meant by 'nano scale'?
What is STMs full form?
LITNING
scanning tunneling microscope
Sahil
how nano science is used for hydrophobicity
Santosh
Do u think that Graphene and Fullrene fiber can be used to make Air Plane body structure the lightest and strongest. Rafiq
Rafiq
what is differents between GO and RGO?
Mahi
what is simplest way to understand the applications of nano robots used to detect the cancer affected cell of human body.? How this robot is carried to required site of body cell.? what will be the carrier material and how can be detected that correct delivery of drug is done Rafiq
Rafiq
what is Nano technology ?
write examples of Nano molecule?
Bob
The nanotechnology is as new science, to scale nanometric
brayan
nanotechnology is the study, desing, synthesis, manipulation and application of materials and functional systems through control of matter at nanoscale
Damian
Is there any normative that regulates the use of silver nanoparticles?
what king of growth are you checking .?
Renato
What fields keep nano created devices from performing or assimulating ? Magnetic fields ? Are do they assimilate ?
why we need to study biomolecules, molecular biology in nanotechnology?
?
Kyle
yes I'm doing my masters in nanotechnology, we are being studying all these domains as well..
why?
what school?
Kyle
biomolecules are e building blocks of every organics and inorganic materials.
Joe
anyone know any internet site where one can find nanotechnology papers?
research.net
kanaga
sciencedirect big data base
Ernesto
Introduction about quantum dots in nanotechnology
what does nano mean?
nano basically means 10^(-9). nanometer is a unit to measure length.
Bharti
do you think it's worthwhile in the long term to study the effects and possibilities of nanotechnology on viral treatment?
absolutely yes
Daniel
how to know photocatalytic properties of tio2 nanoparticles...what to do now
it is a goid question and i want to know the answer as well
Maciej
Abigail
for teaching engĺish at school how nano technology help us
Anassong
How can I make nanorobot?
Lily
Do somebody tell me a best nano engineering book for beginners?
there is no specific books for beginners but there is book called principle of nanotechnology
NANO
how can I make nanorobot?
Lily
what is fullerene does it is used to make bukky balls
are you nano engineer ?
s.
fullerene is a bucky ball aka Carbon 60 molecule. It was name by the architect Fuller. He design the geodesic dome. it resembles a soccer ball.
Tarell
what is the actual application of fullerenes nowadays?
Damian
That is a great question Damian. best way to answer that question is to Google it. there are hundreds of applications for buck minister fullerenes, from medical to aerospace. you can also find plenty of research papers that will give you great detail on the potential applications of fullerenes.
Tarell
how did you get the value of 2000N.What calculations are needed to arrive at it
Privacy Information Security Software Version 1.1a
Good
why its coecients must have a power-law rate of decay with q > 1/p. ?