<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >
Animals are programmed by their genes to act in a manner than most efficiently passes on these genes to subsequent generations, increasing the genes’ chance of survival. Thus, the “paradox of the lek” seemed to defy the very foundations of natural selection and genetics. A lek is a group of males with a very distinct hierarchy who gather together in competitive mating display as a large group. The females of the species almost always choose to mate only with the dominant males in the center of the lek, which should, theoretically, eliminate the diversity of the group and, therefore, the persistence of the act of preference itself. However, this choice is still seen in lekking species. This chapter studies lekking behavior in a variety of animals, such as manakins, the black grouse, antelopes, cichlids, and moor frogs by discussing many of the possible hypotheses for the selection of leks from scientists who have studied this peculiar behavior. Their findings are, to date, inconclusive, but point to such hypotheses lek size, competition among males, female mating bias, territoriality, networking, and environmental factors, as contributing to the persistence of lekking in animals.

Author: Kirby Kempe

Introduction

The wide variety of mating systems and display behaviors in the animal kingdom today represents species’ adaptation and co-adaptation to their environments. Mating behavior is determined both by ecological conditions and by differences in parental care and family organization. Mating behavior can be classified as monogamous or mating multiply, though there are multiple subsets of each broad classification. For example, in a polygynous species, one form of mating multiply, one male can mate with multiple females, whereas in a polyandrous species, one female mates with multiple males ( [link] ). Whenever individuals of one sex can mate with multiple individuals of the other sex, it follows from sex ratio arguments that some to many individuals of the multiple mating sex will not get to mate at all. Species that mate multiply, as opposed to monogamous species, are far more common in the animal kingdom and life-pairs are extremely rare. In fact, the most common system is one in which no bond is formed whatsoever and there is no care by either parent, known as promiscuity. However, even among only multiply-mating species, mating behavior varies widely. Natural selection has worked to favor elaborate courtship rituals and complex mating displays that underline the process of sexual selection , giving rise to species that spend much of their time and energy attracting a mate. Perhaps the most puzzling of these displays, known as a lek, is the large aggregation of displaying males that females interact with solely for the purpose of procreation (Kokko 1996).

Mating systems

Monogamy : Research suggests monogamy occurs when there is no potential for polygamy or for taking advantage of limited polygamy potential. It is estimated that over 90% of avian species are monogamous, but monogamy is very rare among mammals (Emlen et al. 1977). It is hypothesized that monogamy is advantageous when male territories are small and equal and the cost of mating is high, so polygynous females are at a disadvantage, and where male assistance is necessary to raise offspring so the male rears more successful offspring more by assisting one female than by mating multiply (Clutton-Brock 1989).

Polygyny : Polygyny occurs in situations where behavioral and/or environmental conditions cause females to clump together, where males either monopolize them directly or by hoarding resources and mate with the same group multiple times (Emlen et al. 1977, Clutton-Brock 1989). Polygyny is seen in many marsupials, carnivores, and rodents (Clutton-Brock 1989). Polygyny is most common when male home ranges overlap with those of several females as opposed to monogamous ranges overlapping with that of only one female (Clutton-Brock 1989).

Polyandry : Females can monopolize males if resources are congregated and able to monopolize or by defending and directly controlling males (Emlen et al. 1977).

While these are the main systemic classifications, some species alternate between variations of these while some mate in different arrangements altogether.

Questions & Answers

I'm interested in biological psychology and cognitive psychology
Tanya Reply
what does preconceived mean
sammie Reply
physiological Psychology
Nwosu Reply
How can I develope my cognitive domain
Amanyire Reply
why is communication effective
Dakolo Reply
Communication is effective because it allows individuals to share ideas, thoughts, and information with others.
effective communication can lead to improved outcomes in various settings, including personal relationships, business environments, and educational settings. By communicating effectively, individuals can negotiate effectively, solve problems collaboratively, and work towards common goals.
it starts up serve and return practice/assessments.it helps find voice talking therapy also assessments through relaxed conversation.
miss
Every time someone flushes a toilet in the apartment building, the person begins to jumb back automatically after hearing the flush, before the water temperature changes. Identify the types of learning, if it is classical conditioning identify the NS, UCS, CS and CR. If it is operant conditioning, identify the type of consequence positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement or punishment
Wekolamo Reply
please i need answer
Wekolamo
because it helps many people around the world to understand how to interact with other people and understand them well, for example at work (job).
Manix Reply
Agreed 👍 There are many parts of our brains and behaviors, we really need to get to know. Blessings for everyone and happy Sunday!
ARC
A child is a member of community not society elucidate ?
JESSY Reply
Isn't practices worldwide, be it psychology, be it science. isn't much just a false belief of control over something the mind cannot truly comprehend?
Simon Reply
compare and contrast skinner's perspective on personality development on freud
namakula Reply
Skinner skipped the whole unconscious phenomenon and rather emphasized on classical conditioning
war
explain how nature and nurture affect the development and later the productivity of an individual.
Amesalu Reply
nature is an hereditary factor while nurture is an environmental factor which constitute an individual personality. so if an individual's parent has a deviant behavior and was also brought up in an deviant environment, observation of the behavior and the inborn trait we make the individual deviant.
Samuel
I am taking this course because I am hoping that I could somehow learn more about my chosen field of interest and due to the fact that being a PsyD really ignites my passion as an individual the more I hope to learn about developing and literally explore the complexity of my critical thinking skills
Zyryn Reply
good👍
Jonathan
and having a good philosophy of the world is like a sandwich and a peanut butter 👍
Jonathan
generally amnesi how long yrs memory loss
Kelu Reply
interpersonal relationships
Abdulfatai Reply
What would be the best educational aid(s) for gifted kids/savants?
Heidi Reply
treat them normal, if they want help then give them. that will make everyone happy
Saurabh
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store Now




Source:  OpenStax, Mockingbird tales: readings in animal behavior. OpenStax CNX. Jan 12, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11211/1.5
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Mockingbird tales: readings in animal behavior' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask