<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Professional development

As part of New Jersey’s commitment to standards and accountability to school leaders, the professional development component is offered as a companion to the performance based leadership evaluation process. Standards based and job embedded experiences requires systematically and intentionally planning for the development of knowledge for, in , and of practice related to school leadership. First and foremost, the professional development experience for school leaders should be driven by feedback from the evaluation process. The professional development framework should include action research, study groups, peer observations, shadowing sessions, journal writing, and group lectures delivered by experts in the field (Sparks&Loucks-Horsley, 1990).

Conclusion

This proposed system of principal evaluation is in direct response to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s Executive Order No. 42. It is submitted by the executive board for the New Jersey affiliate of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration (NJ-NCPEA) for discussion and proposed as a suggested comprehensive strategy to address the need for a uniform and reliable statewide system of principal evaluation and assessment.

Given the current accountability trends nationwide, which are based primarily on high stakes standardized test scores and value added measures, it is critical that any system of evaluation for school leaders avoid the temptation of relying exclusively on any single measure of accountability and instead promote and encourage a formative and summative procedure for evaluation that is both job embedded and standards based (Brown-Sims, 2010). Additionally, a design that incorporates multiple forms of assessment to obtain a holistic view of leadership performance is essential to this plan if it is going to not only be both informative and instructional but also ethical and equitable. (Portin et al., 2006).

References

  • Amsterdam, C. E., Johnson, R. L., Monrad, D. M.,&Tonnensen, S. L. (2005). A collaborative approach to the development and validation of a principal evaluation system: A case study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17 (3), 221 – 242.
  • Brown-Sims, M. (2010). Evaluating school principals. Tips&tools. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
  • Catano, N.,&Stronge, J. H. (2006, September). What are principals expected to do? Congruence between principal evaluation and performance standards. NASSP Bulletin, 90 (3), 221-237.
  • Cantano, N.,&Stronge, J. H. (2007). What do we expect of school principals? Congruence between principal and evaluation and performance standards. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 10 (4), 379-399.
  • Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2008). Educational Leadership Policy Standards: ISLLC 2008. Washington, DC: Author
  • Gecas, V. (1985). Self-concept. In A. Kuper,&J. Kuper (Eds.), The Social Science Encyclopedia (pp. 739-741). London: Routledge.
  • Green, J. E. (2004a). Evaluating principals: Issues and practices. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Education Foundation.
  • Green, J. E. (2004b, October). Principal’s portfolios. School Administrator, 61 (9), 30 – 33.
  • Johnston, M.,&Thomas, M. (2005). Riding the wave of administrator accountability: A portfolio approach. Journal of Educational Administration, 43 (3), 368 – 386.
  • Kaplan, L. S., Owings, W. A.,&Nunnery, J. (2005, June). Principal quality: A Virginia study connecting Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Standards with student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89 (643), 28 - 44
  • Leithwood, K., Begley, P. T.,&Cousins, J. B. (1994). Developing expert leadership for future schools. London: Falmer Press.
  • Leithwood, K.,&Jantzi, D. (2008, August). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44 (496). Retrieved from http://eaq.sagepub.com/content/44/4/496.short
  • Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S.,&Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation
  • Marcoux, J., Brown, G., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R. (2003, April 23-25). A case study on the use of portfolios in principal evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Marzano, R. J., Waters, T.&McNulty. B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexanderia, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  • Mestry, R.,&Schmidt, M. (2010, January 13). Portfolio assessment as a tool for promoting professional development of school principals: A South African perspective. Education and Urban Society, 42 (352) . Retrieved from http://eus.sagepub.com/content/21/3/352.short
  • Murphy, J. (2002, September/October). How the ISLLC Standards are reshaping the principalship. Principal, 82 (1), 22 – 26.
  • Portin, B. S., Feldman, S.,&Knapp, M. S. (2006). Purposes, uses, and practices of leadership assessment in education. Commissioned by The Wallace Foundation. Seattle, WA: The University of Washington Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
  • Reeves, D. (2009). Assessing educational leaders: Evaluating performance for improved individual and organizational results . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Roan, A.,&Rooney, D. (2006). Shadowing experiences and the extension of communities of practice: A case study of women education managers. Management Learning, 37 (4), 433-454
  • Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A.,&Rowe, K. J. (2008, September 28). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44 (635). Retrieved from http://eaq.sagepub.com/content/44/5/635.short
  • Sparks, D.,&Loucks-Horsley, S. (1990). Models of staff development. In W. R. Houston (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp.234-250). New York: MacMillan.
  • Stine, D. O. (2001, April). Developing an evaluation system to improve principal performance and accountability . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington.
  • Stufflebeam, D. L.,&Nevo, D. (1993). Principal evaluation: New directions for improvement. Peabody Journal of Education , 68 (2), 24-25
  • Tusin, L. F. (1999) Deciding to teach. In R. P. Lipka,&T.M. Brinthaupt (Eds.), The role of self in teacher development (pp. 11-35). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Vyortkina, D. (2003). Portfolio assessment in educational leadership programs at master’s level. A doctoral dissertation at The Florida State University. Pro Quest 3137389.
  • Walker, J. E. (1990). Shadowing the skills of exemplary principals. Education Digest , 56 (1), 45-49.

Appendix a

Figure 1

Appendix b

Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium 2008 Standards (CCSSO, 2008, p. 14-15)

Questions & Answers

List and explain four factors of production
Vuyo Reply
capital labour entrepreneur natural resources
Thembi
What is supply
Ogodo Reply
when the supply decreases demand also decreases
Thembi
types of demand and the explanation
akin Reply
what is demand
akin Reply
other things remaining same if demend is increases supply is also decrease and if demend is decrease supply is also increases is called the demand
Mian
if the demand increase supply also increases
Thembi
you are wrong this is the law of demand and not the definition
Tarasum
Demand is the willingness of buy and ability to buy in a specific time period in specific place. Mian you are saying law of demand but not in proper way. you have to keep studying more. because its very basic things in Economics.
Hamza
Demand is the price of Quantity goods and services in which consumer's are willing and able to offer at a price in the market over a period of time
Umar
Demand is the quantity of goods and services that the consumer are willing and able to buy at a alternative prices over a given period of time. But mind you demand is quite different from need and want.
Tarasum
what is commercialization?
Doris Reply
How to talk loan for bank?
Alfred Reply
what is the meaning of gpa?
Ritisha Reply
Answer: GPA stands for Grade Point Average. It is a standard way of measuring academic achievement in the U.S. Basically, it goes as follows: Each course is given a certain number of "units" or "credits", depending on the content of the course.
Yusuf
what is small and Microbuisenes
tadesse Reply
What is fiscal policy
Dansofo
Who is the funder of Economic
Dansofo
founder , that is Adam Smith
Daniel
what is model
Daniel Reply
The wealth of Nations
Yusuf Reply
the wealth of nations, is it the first?
Umar
Yes very sure it was released in 1759
Yusuf
thank you Yusuf.
Umar
then when did he died?
Umar
17 July 1790 Born: 16 June 1723, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom Place of death: Panmure House, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Yusuf
1790
Yusuf
that's my today questions, thank you Yusuf it's bed time see u after.
Umar
what is fiscal policy
kemigisha Reply
what's mode?
Umar Reply
mode is the highest occurring frequency in a distribution
Bola
mode is the most commonly occurring item in a set of data.
Umar
Please, what is the difference between monopoly and monopsony?
Olaleye Reply
is there monopsony word?
Umar
I have no idea though
Umar
please, in which year Adam smith was born?
Umar
monopsony is when there's only one buyer while monopoly is when there's only one producer.
Bola
who have idea on Banter
Ibrahim
like trade by barter?
Bola
Monopoly is when there's excessively one seller and there is no entry in the market while monopsony is when there is one buyer
kemigisha
Adam smith was born in 1723
Bola
 (uncountable) Good humoured, playful, typically spontaneous conversation. verb (intransitive) To engage in banter or playful conversation. (intransitive) To play or do something amusing. (transitive) To tease mildly.
Umar
which book Adam smith published first? the first book of Adam smith pls.
Umar
wealth on nation, 1776
Daniel
what is market power and how can it affect an economy?
Gab Reply
market power:- where a firm is said to be a price setter.market power benefits the powerful at the expense of others.
Umar
Market power refers to the ability of a firm (or group of firms) to raise and maintain price above the level that would prevail under competition is referred to as market or monopoly power. The exercise of market power leads to reduced output and loss of economic welfare
Kartheek
find information about the national budget
Molahlegi
three branches of economics in which tourism is likely to figure
Makgotso Reply
What are those three branches?
IlRegno
in a comparison of the stages of meiosis to the stage of mitosis, which stages are unique to meiosis and which stages have the same event in botg meiosis and mitosis
Leah Reply
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

Get the best Algebra and trigonometry course in your pocket!





Source:  OpenStax, Education leadership review special issue: portland conference, volume 12, number 3 (october 2011). OpenStax CNX. Oct 17, 2011 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11362/1.5
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Education leadership review special issue: portland conference, volume 12, number 3 (october 2011)' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask