<< Chapter < Page | Chapter >> Page > |
(a) What is the final speed of the roller coaster shown in [link] if it starts from rest at the top of the 20.0 m hill and work done by frictional forces is negligible? (b) What is its final speed (again assuming negligible friction) if its initial speed is 5.00 m/s?
Strategy
The roller coaster loses potential energy as it goes downhill. We neglect friction, so that the remaining force exerted by the track is the normal force, which is perpendicular to the direction of motion and does no work. The net work on the roller coaster is then done by gravity alone. The loss of gravitational potential energy from moving downward through a distance $h$ equals the gain in kinetic energy. This can be written in equation form as $-\text{\Delta}{\text{PE}}_{\text{g}}=\text{\Delta}\text{KE}$ . Using the equations for ${\text{PE}}_{\text{g}}$ and $\text{KE}$ , we can solve for the final speed $v$ , which is the desired quantity.
Solution for (a)
Here the initial kinetic energy is zero, so that $\text{\Delta KE}=\frac{1}{2}{\text{mv}}^{2}$ . The equation for change in potential energy states that ${\text{\Delta PE}}_{\text{g}}=\text{mgh}$ . Since $h$ is negative in this case, we will rewrite this as ${\text{\Delta PE}}_{\text{g}}=-\text{mg}\mid h\mid $ to show the minus sign clearly. Thus,
becomes
Solving for $v$ , we find that mass cancels and that
Substituting known values,
Solution for (b)
Again $-{\text{\Delta PE}}_{\text{g}}=\text{\Delta KE}$ . In this case there is initial kinetic energy, so $\text{\Delta KE}=\frac{1}{2}m{v}^{2}-\frac{1}{2}m{{v}_{0}}^{2}$ . Thus,
Rearranging gives
This means that the final kinetic energy is the sum of the initial kinetic energy and the gravitational potential energy. Mass again cancels, and
This equation is very similar to the kinematics equation $v=\sqrt{{{v}_{0}}^{2}+2\text{ad}}$ , but it is more general—the kinematics equation is valid only for constant acceleration, whereas our equation above is valid for any path regardless of whether the object moves with a constant acceleration. Now, substituting known values gives
Discussion and Implications
First, note that mass cancels. This is quite consistent with observations made in Falling Objects that all objects fall at the same rate if friction is negligible. Second, only the speed of the roller coaster is considered; there is no information about its direction at any point. This reveals another general truth. When friction is negligible, the speed of a falling body depends only on its initial speed and height, and not on its mass or the path taken. For example, the roller coaster will have the same final speed whether it falls 20.0 m straight down or takes a more complicated path like the one in the figure. Third, and perhaps unexpectedly, the final speed in part (b) is greater than in part (a), but by far less than 5.00 m/s. Finally, note that speed can be found at any height along the way by simply using the appropriate value of $h$ at the point of interest.
We have seen that work done by or against the gravitational force depends only on the starting and ending points, and not on the path between, allowing us to define the simplifying concept of gravitational potential energy. We can do the same thing for a few other forces, and we will see that this leads to a formal definition of the law of conservation of energy.
Does the work you do on a book when you lift it onto a shelf depend on the path taken? On the time taken? On the height of the shelf? On the mass of the book?
A hydroelectric power facility (see [link] ) converts the gravitational potential energy of water behind a dam to electric energy. (a) What is the gravitational potential energy relative to the generators of a lake of volume $\text{50}\text{.}\mathrm{0\; k}{\text{m}}^{3}$ ( $\text{mass}=5\text{.}\text{00}\times {\text{10}}^{\text{13}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{kg})$ , given that the lake has an average height of 40.0 m above the generators?
(a) $1\text{.}\text{96}\times {\text{10}}^{\text{16}}\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}\text{J}$
A 100-g toy car is propelled by a compressed spring that starts it moving. The car follows the curved track in [link] . Show that the final speed of the toy car is 0.687 m/s if its initial speed is 2.00 m/s and it coasts up the frictionless slope, gaining 0.180 m in altitude.
In a downhill ski race, surprisingly, little advantage is gained by getting a running start. (This is because the initial kinetic energy is small compared with the gain in gravitational potential energy on even small hills.) To demonstrate this, find the final speed and the time taken for a skier who skies 70.0 m along a $\text{30\xba}$ slope neglecting friction: (a) Starting from rest. (b) Starting with an initial speed of 2.50 m/s. (c) Does the answer surprise you? Discuss why it is still advantageous to get a running start in very competitive events.
Notification Switch
Would you like to follow the 'Unit 5 - work and energy' conversation and receive update notifications?