# 0.3 Approximation and processing in bases  (Page 5/5)

 Page 5 / 5

Chapter 10 describes the implementation of audio transform codes. Image transform codesin block cosine bases and wavelet bases are introduced, together with the JPEG and JPEG-2000 compression standards.

## Denoising

Signal-acquisition devices add noise that can be reduced by estimators using prior information on signalproperties. Signal processing has long remained mostly Bayesian and linear.Nonlinear smoothing algorithms existed in statistics, but these procedures were often ad hoc and complex.Two statisticians, Donoho andJohnstone (DonohoJ:94), changed the “game” by proving that simple thresholdingin sparse representations can yield nearly optimal nonlinear estimators.This was the beginning of a considerable refinement of nonlinear estimation algorithms that is still ongoing.

Let us consider digital measurements that add a random noise $W\left[n\right]$ to the original signal $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f\left[n\right]$ :

$X\left[n\right]\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}f\left[n\right]+W\left[n\right]\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}\text{for}\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}0\le n

The signal $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f$ is estimated by transforming the noisy data X with an operator D :

$\stackrel{˜}{F}=DX.$

The risk of the estimator $\stackrel{˜}{F}$ of $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f$ is the average error, calculated with respect to the probability distribution of noise W :

$r\left(D,f\right)=E\left\{\parallel \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f-DX{\parallel }^{2}\right\}.$

## Bayes versus minimax

To optimize the estimation operator D , one must take advantage of priorinformation available about signal $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f$ . In a Bayes framework, $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f$ is considered a realization of a random vector $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}F$ and the Bayes risk is the expected risk calculated with respect to theprior probability distribution π of the random signal model $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}F$ :

$r\left(D,\pi \right)={E}_{\pi }\left\{r\left(D,F\right)\right\}.$

Optimizing D among all possible operators yields the minimum Bayes risk :

${r}_{n}\left(\pi \right)=\underset{all\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}D}{inf}r\left(D,\pi \right).$

In the 1940s, Wald brought in a new perspective on statistics with a decision theory partly importedfrom the theory of games. This point of view uses deterministic models, wheresignals are elements of a set Θ , without specifying their probability distribution in this set.To control the risk for any $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f\in \Theta$ , we compute the maximum risk:

$r\left(D,\Theta \right)=\underset{f\in \Theta }{sup}r\left(D,f\right).$

The minimax risk is the lower bound computed over all operators D :

${r}_{n}\left(\Theta \right)=\underset{all\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}D}{inf}r\left(D,\Theta \right).$

In practice, the goal is to find an operator D that is simple to implement and yields a risk close to the minimax lower bound.

## Thresholding estimators

It is tempting to restrict calculations to linear operators D because of their simplicity. Optimal linear Wiener estimators areintroduced in Chapter 11. Figure (a)is an image contaminated by Gaussian white noise. Figure (b)shows an optimized linear filtering estimation $\stackrel{˜}{F}=X\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}☆\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}h\left[n\right]$ , which is therefore diagonal in a Fourier basis $\mathcal{B}$ . This convolution operator averages the noise but also blurs the imageand keeps low-frequency noise by retaining the image's low frequencies.

If $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f$ has a sparse representation in a dictionary, then projecting X on the vectors of this sparse support can considerably improve linear estimators. The difficulty is identifyingthe sparse support of $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f$ from the noisy data X . Donoho and Johnstone (DonohoJ:94) proved that,in an orthonormal basis, a simple thresholding of noisy coefficients does the trick. Noisy signal coefficients in an orthonormal basis $\mathcal{B}={\left\{{g}_{m}\right\}}_{m\in \Gamma }$ are

$⟨X,{g}_{m}⟩=⟨\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f,{g}_{m}⟩+⟨W\phantom{\rule{-1.0pt}{0ex}},{g}_{m}⟩\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}\text{for}\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}m\in \gamma .$

Thresholding these noisy coefficients yields an orthogonal projection estimator

$\begin{array}{c}\hfill \stackrel{˜}{F}={X}_{{\stackrel{˜}{\Lambda }}_{T}}=\sum _{m\in {\stackrel{˜}{\Lambda }}_{T}}⟨X,{g}_{m}⟩\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}{g}_{m}\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}\text{with}\phantom{\rule{1.em}{0ex}}{\stackrel{˜}{\Lambda }}_{T}=\left\{m\in \gamma \phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}:\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}|⟨X,{g}_{m}⟩|\ge T\right\}.\end{array}$

The set ${\stackrel{˜}{\Lambda }}_{T}$ is an estimate of an approximation support of $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f$ . It is hopefully close to the optimal approximation support ${\lambda }_{T}=\left\{m\in \gamma \phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}:\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}|⟨\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f,{g}_{m}⟩|\ge T\right\}$ .

[link] (b) shows the estimated approximation set ${\stackrel{˜}{\lambda }}_{T}$ of noisy-wavelet coefficients, $|⟨X,{\psi }_{j,n}|\ge T$ , that can be compared to the optimal approximation support Λ T shown in [link] (b). The estimation in [link] (d) from wavelet coefficients in ${\stackrel{˜}{\lambda }}_{T}$ has considerably reduced the noise in regular regions while keeping the sharpness of edges by preserving large-waveletcoefficients. This estimation is improved with a translation-invariant procedure that averages this estimator over several translated waveletbases. Thresholding wavelet coefficients implements an adaptivesmoothing, which averages the data X with a kernel that depends on the estimated regularity of the original signal $\phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f$ .

Donoho and Johnstone proved that for Gaussian white noise of variance σ 2 , choosing $T=\sigma \sqrt{2{log}_{\mathrm{e}}N}$ yields a risk $E\left\{\parallel \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f-\stackrel{˜}{F}{\parallel }^{2}\right\}$ of the order of $\parallel \phantom{\rule{0.166667em}{0ex}}f-{f}_{{\Lambda }_{T}}{\parallel }^{2}$ , up to a ${log}_{\mathrm{e}}N$ factor. This spectacular result shows that theestimated support ${\stackrel{˜}{\lambda }}_{T}$ does nearly as well as the optimal unknown support λ T . The resulting risk is small if the representation is sparse and precise.

The set ${\stackrel{˜}{\lambda }}_{T}$ in [link] (b) “looks” different from the λ T in [link] (b) because it has more isolated points. This indicates that some prior information onthe geometry of λ T could be used to improve the estimation. For audio noise-reduction, thresholding estimators areapplied in sparse representations provided by time-frequency bases.Similar isolated time-frequency coefficients produce a highly annoying “musical noise.”Musical noise is removed with a block thresholding that regularizes the geometry of theestimated support ${\stackrel{˜}{\lambda }}_{T}$ and avoids leaving isolated points. Block thresholding also improves wavelet estimators.

If W is a Gaussian noise and signals in Θ have a sparse representation in $\mathcal{B}$ , then Chapter 11 proves that thresholding estimators can produce a nearly minimax risk.In particular, wavelet thresholding estimators have a nearly minimax risk for large classes of piecewise smoothsignals, including bounded variation images.

#### Questions & Answers

how can chip be made from sand
Eke Reply
is this allso about nanoscale material
Almas
are nano particles real
Missy Reply
yeah
Joseph
Hello, if I study Physics teacher in bachelor, can I study Nanotechnology in master?
Lale Reply
no can't
Lohitha
where is the latest information on a no technology how can I find it
William
currently
William
where we get a research paper on Nano chemistry....?
Maira Reply
nanopartical of organic/inorganic / physical chemistry , pdf / thesis / review
Ali
what are the products of Nano chemistry?
Maira Reply
There are lots of products of nano chemistry... Like nano coatings.....carbon fiber.. And lots of others..
learn
Even nanotechnology is pretty much all about chemistry... Its the chemistry on quantum or atomic level
learn
Google
da
no nanotechnology is also a part of physics and maths it requires angle formulas and some pressure regarding concepts
Bhagvanji
hey
Giriraj
Preparation and Applications of Nanomaterial for Drug Delivery
Hafiz Reply
revolt
da
Application of nanotechnology in medicine
has a lot of application modern world
Kamaluddeen
yes
narayan
what is variations in raman spectra for nanomaterials
Jyoti Reply
ya I also want to know the raman spectra
Bhagvanji
I only see partial conversation and what's the question here!
Crow Reply
what about nanotechnology for water purification
RAW Reply
please someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think one can use nanoparticles, specially silver nanoparticles for water treatment.
Damian
yes that's correct
Professor
I think
Professor
Nasa has use it in the 60's, copper as water purification in the moon travel.
Alexandre
nanocopper obvius
Alexandre
what is the stm
Brian Reply
is there industrial application of fullrenes. What is the method to prepare fullrene on large scale.?
Rafiq
industrial application...? mmm I think on the medical side as drug carrier, but you should go deeper on your research, I may be wrong
Damian
How we are making nano material?
LITNING Reply
what is a peer
LITNING Reply
What is meant by 'nano scale'?
LITNING Reply
What is STMs full form?
LITNING
scanning tunneling microscope
Sahil
how nano science is used for hydrophobicity
Santosh
Do u think that Graphene and Fullrene fiber can be used to make Air Plane body structure the lightest and strongest. Rafiq
Rafiq
what is differents between GO and RGO?
Mahi
what is simplest way to understand the applications of nano robots used to detect the cancer affected cell of human body.? How this robot is carried to required site of body cell.? what will be the carrier material and how can be detected that correct delivery of drug is done Rafiq
Rafiq
if virus is killing to make ARTIFICIAL DNA OF GRAPHENE FOR KILLED THE VIRUS .THIS IS OUR ASSUMPTION
Anam
analytical skills graphene is prepared to kill any type viruses .
Anam
Any one who tell me about Preparation and application of Nanomaterial for drug Delivery
Hafiz
what is Nano technology ?
Bob Reply
write examples of Nano molecule?
Bob
The nanotechnology is as new science, to scale nanometric
brayan
nanotechnology is the study, desing, synthesis, manipulation and application of materials and functional systems through control of matter at nanoscale
Damian
Got questions? Join the online conversation and get instant answers!
Jobilize.com Reply

### Read also:

#### Get Jobilize Job Search Mobile App in your pocket Now!

Source:  OpenStax, A wavelet tour of signal processing, the sparse way. OpenStax CNX. Sep 14, 2009 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col10711/1.3
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'A wavelet tour of signal processing, the sparse way' conversation and receive update notifications? By OpenStax By Mistry Bhavesh By Darlene Paliswat By OpenStax By Laurence Bailen By Michael Sag By Heather McAvoy By Janet Forrester By Jesenia Wofford By OpenStax