# 1.5 Exponential and logarithmic functions  (Page 5/17)

 Page 5 / 17

Solve $\text{ln}\left({x}^{3}\right)-4\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}\text{ln}\left(x\right)=1.$

$x=\frac{1}{e}$

When evaluating a logarithmic function with a calculator, you may have noticed that the only options are ${\text{log}}_{10}$ or log, called the common logarithm , or ln , which is the natural logarithm. However, exponential functions and logarithm functions can be expressed in terms of any desired base $b.$ If you need to use a calculator to evaluate an expression with a different base, you can apply the change-of-base formulas first. Using this change of base, we typically write a given exponential or logarithmic function in terms of the natural exponential and natural logarithmic functions.

## Rule: change-of-base formulas

Let $a>0,b>0,$ and $a\ne 1,b\ne 1.$

1. ${a}^{x}={b}^{x{\text{log}}_{b}a}$ for any real number $x.$
If $b=e,$ this equation reduces to ${a}^{x}={e}^{x{\text{log}}_{e}a}={e}^{x\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}\text{ln}\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}a}.$
2. ${\text{log}}_{a}x=\frac{{\text{log}}_{b}x}{{\text{log}}_{b}a}$ for any real number $x>0.$
If $b=e,$ this equation reduces to ${\text{log}}_{a}x=\frac{\text{ln}\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}x}{\text{ln}\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}a}.$

## Proof

For the first change-of-base formula, we begin by making use of the power property of logarithmic functions. We know that for any base $b>0,b\ne 1,{\text{log}}_{b}\left({a}^{x}\right)=x{\text{log}}_{b}a.$ Therefore,

${b}^{{\text{log}}_{b}\left({a}^{x}\right)}={b}^{x{\text{log}}_{b}a}.$

In addition, we know that ${b}^{x}$ and ${\text{log}}_{b}\left(x\right)$ are inverse functions. Therefore,

${b}^{{\text{log}}_{b}\left({a}^{x}\right)}={a}^{x}.$

Combining these last two equalities, we conclude that ${a}^{x}={b}^{x{\text{log}}_{b}a}.$

To prove the second property, we show that

$\left({\text{log}}_{b}a\right)·\left({\text{log}}_{a}x\right)={\text{log}}_{b}x.$

Let $u={\text{log}}_{b}a,v={\text{log}}_{a}x,$ and $w={\text{log}}_{b}x.$ We will show that $u·v=w.$ By the definition of logarithmic functions, we know that ${b}^{u}=a,{a}^{v}=x,$ and ${b}^{w}=x.$ From the previous equations, we see that

${b}^{uv}={\left({b}^{u}\right)}^{v}={a}^{v}=x={b}^{w}.$

Therefore, ${b}^{uv}={b}^{w}.$ Since exponential functions are one-to-one, we can conclude that $u·v=w.$

## Changing bases

Use a calculating utility to evaluate ${\text{log}}_{3}7$ with the change-of-base formula presented earlier.

Use the second equation with $a=3$ and $e=3\text{:}$

${\text{log}}_{3}7=\frac{\text{ln}\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}7}{\text{ln}\phantom{\rule{0.1em}{0ex}}3}\approx 1.77124.$

Use the change-of-base formula and a calculating utility to evaluate ${\text{log}}_{4}6.$

$1.29248$

## Chapter opener: the richter scale for earthquakes

In 1935, Charles Richter developed a scale (now known as the Richter scale ) to measure the magnitude of an earthquake . The scale is a base-10 logarithmic scale, and it can be described as follows: Consider one earthquake with magnitude ${R}_{1}$ on the Richter scale and a second earthquake with magnitude ${R}_{2}$ on the Richter scale. Suppose ${R}_{1}>{R}_{2},$ which means the earthquake of magnitude ${R}_{1}$ is stronger, but how much stronger is it than the other earthquake? A way of measuring the intensity of an earthquake is by using a seismograph to measure the amplitude of the earthquake waves. If ${A}_{1}$ is the amplitude measured for the first earthquake and ${A}_{2}$ is the amplitude measured for the second earthquake, then the amplitudes and magnitudes of the two earthquakes satisfy the following equation:

${R}_{1}-{R}_{2}={\text{log}}_{10}\left(\frac{{A}_{1}}{{A}_{2}}\right).$

Consider an earthquake that measures 8 on the Richter scale and an earthquake that measures 7 on the Richter scale. Then,

$8-7={\text{log}}_{10}\left(\frac{{A}_{1}}{{A}_{2}}\right).$

Therefore,

${\text{log}}_{10}\left(\frac{{A}_{1}}{{A}_{2}}\right)=1,$

which implies ${A}_{1}\text{/}{A}_{2}=10$ or ${A}_{1}=10{A}_{2}.$ Since ${A}_{1}$ is 10 times the size of ${A}_{2},$ we say that the first earthquake is 10 times as intense as the second earthquake. On the other hand, if one earthquake measures 8 on the Richter scale and another measures 6, then the relative intensity of the two earthquakes satisfies the equation

${\text{log}}_{10}\left(\frac{{A}_{1}}{{A}_{2}}\right)=8-6=2.$

Therefore, ${A}_{1}=100{A}_{2}.$ That is, the first earthquake is 100 times more intense than the second earthquake.

How can we use logarithmic functions to compare the relative severity of the magnitude 9 earthquake in Japan in 2011 with the magnitude 7.3 earthquake in Haiti in 2010?

To compare the Japan and Haiti earthquakes, we can use an equation presented earlier:

$9-7.3={\text{log}}_{10}\left(\frac{{A}_{1}}{{A}_{2}}\right).$

Therefore, ${A}_{1}\text{/}{A}_{2}={10}^{1.7},$ and we conclude that the earthquake in Japan was approximately $50$ times more intense than the earthquake in Haiti.

what is a maximax
A maxima in a curve refers to the maximum point said curve. The maxima is a point where the gradient of the curve is equal to 0 (dy/dx = 0) and its second derivative value is a negative (d²y/dx² = -ve).
Viewer
what is the limit of x^2+x when x approaches 0
find derivatives 3√x²+√3x²
3 + 3=6
mujahid
How to do basic integrals
write something lmit
find the integral of tan tanxdx
-ln|cosx| + C
Jug
discuss continuity of x-[x] at [ _1 1]
Given that u = tan–¹(y/x), show that d²u/dx² + d²u/dy²=0
find the limiting value of 5n-3÷2n-7
Use the first principal to solve the following questions 5x-1
175000/9*100-100+164294/9*100-100*4
mode of (x+4) is equal to 10..graph it how?
66
ram
6
ram
6
Cajab
what is domain in calculus
nelson
integrals of 1/6-6x-5x²
derivative of (-x^3+1)%x^2
(-x^5+x^2)/100
(-5x^4+2x)/100
oh sorry it's (-x^3+1)÷x^2
Misha
-5x^4+2x
sorry I didn't understan A with that symbol
find the derivative of the following y=4^e5x y=Cos^2 y=x^inx , x>0 y= 1+x^2/1-x^2 y=Sin ^2 3x + Cos^2 3x please guys I need answer and solutions
differentiate y=(3x-2)^2(2x^2+5) and simplify the result
Ga
72x³-72x²+106x-60
okhiria
y= (2x^2+5)(3x+9)^2
lemmor