<< Chapter < Page Chapter >> Page >

Kepler discoveries.

A bar graph of Kepler Discoveries. The vertical axis is labeled “Fraction Observed”, from 0 to .3, and the horizontal axis is labeled “Planet Size (Earth = 1)” from 0.5 – 0.7 to 16 – 23. A bar labeled “55” is above 0.5 – 0.7 Planet Size and approximately 0.03 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “165” is above 0.7 – 1 Planet Size and approximately 0.07 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “381” is above 1 – 1.4 Planet Size and approximately 0.165 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “520” is above 1.4 – 2 Planet Size and approximately 0.23 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “567” is above 2 – 2.8 Planet Size and approximately 0.26 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “268” is above 2.8 – 4 Planet Size and approximately 0.12 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “94” is above 4 – 5.7 Planet Size and approximately 0.04 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “54” is above 5.7 – 8 Planet Size and approximately 0.025 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “53” is above 8 – 11 Planet Size and approximately 0.025 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “39” is above 11 – 16 Planet Size and approximately 0.02 Fraction Observed. A bar labeled “17” is above 16 – 23 Planet Size and approximately 0.01 Fraction Observed. At the top of the graph planets in our solar system are shown above their representative size as labeled on the x-axis. A gap between 1.4 – 2 and 2 – 2.8 is labeled “Sizes not seen in our solar system”.
This bar graph shows the number of planets of each size range found among the first 2213 Kepler planet discoveries. Sizes range from half the size of Earth to 20 times that of Earth. On the vertical axis, you can see the fraction that each size range makes up of the total. Note that planets that are between 1.4 and 4 times the size of Earth make up the largest fractions, yet this size range is not represented among the planets in our solar system. (credit: modification of work by NASA/Kepler mission)

What a remarkable discovery it is that the most common types of planets in the Galaxy are completely absent from our solar system and were unknown until Kepler’s survey. However, recall that really small planets were difficult for the Kepler instruments to find. So, to estimate the frequency of Earth-size exoplanets, we need to correct for this sampling bias. The result is the corrected size distribution shown in [link] . Notice that in this graph, we have also taken the step of showing not the number of Kepler detections but the average number of planets per star for solar-type stars (spectral types F, G, and K).

Size distribution of planets for stars similar to the sun.

A bar graph of Size Distribution of Planets for Stars Similar to the Sun. The vertical axis is labeled “Average Number of Planets per Star”, from 0 to .3, and the horizontal axis is labeled “Planet Size (Earth = 1)” from 1 – 1.4 to 16 – 23. A bar above 1 – 1.4 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.35 on the vertical axis. A bar above 1.4 – 2 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.27 on the vertical axis. A bar above 2 – 2.8 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.31 on the vertical axis. A bar above 2.8 – 4 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.14 on the vertical axis. A bar above 4 – 5.7 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.055 on the vertical axis. A bar above 5.7 – 8 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.048 on the vertical axis. A bar above 8 – 11 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.04 on the vertical axis. A bar above 11 – 16 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.01 on the vertical axis. A bar above 16 – 23 Planet Size rises to approximately 0.009 on the vertical axis. At the top of the graph planets in our solar system are shown above their representative size as labeled on the x-axis. A gap between 1.4 – 2 and 2 – 2.8 is labeled “Sizes not seen in our solar system”.
We show the average number of planets per star in each planet size range. (The average is less than one because some stars will have zero planets of that size range.) This distribution, corrected for biases in the Kepler data, shows that Earth-size planets may actually be the most common type of exoplanets. (credit: modification of work by NASA/Kepler mission)

We see that the most common planet sizes of are those with radii from 1 to 3 times that of Earth—what we have called “Earths” and “super-Earths.” Each group occurs in about one-third to one-quarter of stars. In other words, if we group these sizes together, we can conclude there is nearly one such planet per star! And remember, this census includes primarily planets with orbital periods less than 2 years. We do not yet know how many undiscovered planets might exist at larger distances from their star.

To estimate the number of Earth-size planets in our Galaxy, we need to remember that there are approximately 100 billion stars of spectral types F, G, and K. Therefore, we estimate that there are about 30 billion Earth-size planets in our Galaxy. If we include the super-Earths too, then there could be one hundred billion in the whole Galaxy. This idea—that planets of roughly Earth’s size are so numerous—is surely one of the most important discoveries of modern astronomy.

Planets with known densities

For several hundred exoplanets, we have been able to measure both the size of the planet from transit data and its mass from Doppler data, yielding an estimate of its density. Comparing the average density of exoplanets to the density of planets in our solar system helps us understand whether they are rocky or gaseous in nature. This has been particularly important for understanding the structure of the new categories of super-Earths and mini-Neptunes with masses between 3–10 times the mass of Earth. A key observation so far is that planets that are more than 10 times the mass of Earth have substantial gaseous envelopes (like Uranus and Neptune) whereas lower-mass planets are predominately rocky in nature (like the terrestrial planets).

Questions & Answers

In need to read some books about Astronomy so how can in get it actually leg live in Ethiopia can uh help me with that?
Mom Reply
I am sri Sharan .m .what is my best favourable numbers
Madhesh Reply
how can we know it
sruthi
😂😂
Rango
bahut hard
Rango
Why no object can travel with speed greater than light?
geometry Reply
Because the mass of light particles is zero
Asim
Can mass be negative?
geometry
No
Asim
anybody stated that the light is the only thing is speed
sruthi
geometry are you a korean or kpop fan
sruthi
in this universe anything can be faster than light because we simply can't get to an conclusion
sruthi
I am a an Army but lets not bring spam here.
geometry
But why mass can't be negative. What I mean is how can we claim an object made of strange matter has positive mass. In other words, theoretically can negative mass exist?
geometry
in our observable universe nothing is faster than the speed of light
Rango
Thanks
geometry
But theoretically, is it possible? Sorry I'm being very curious..
geometry
I don't know about dark matter but may be you should think about dark matter because dark matter are really strange
Rango
Exactly so theoretically, an dark matter lazer can be greater in speed. Also maybe quartz..
geometry
may be but i am not sure about quartz and btw techyons travel faster than light but techyons are hypothesized
Rango
there are many objects which are perceived to be faster than light
Ganeshan
The object have their own declination rate in speed,the air friction can develop higher temperature resulting the object to be disappear in molecules,not considering the Physical conditions in space.The object should be unaffected with the air friction and also speed should proportionate with fuel.
Near
what is Deja Vu theory?
rockstar Reply
Have you ever felt like something has ever happened before? That's Deja Vu. The Deja Vu theory says that once you have those visions, you are actually experiencing what an alternate reality would have been. Basically it's the collision of both our universe and another.
AlteredEdge
Yeah it gives us an idea about the existence of a parallel universe
Debabrata
is this a hypothesis? or theory? isn't there something with your brain/memory processing the image or info twice in a few seconds?
Collins
I do also love this experience, seems so unreal but real all at once.
Collins
this can be real if we will solve the mystery of quantum physics .
YOG
I was giving just giving my own hypothesis of the general topic. While it would be interesting to find that we transitioned through dimensions, I think it just boils down to a heightened ability to predict future outcomes and a series of subconscious decisions to enact one of those possible outcomes
AlteredEdge
What I'm saying is that it's all in your head. 😂
AlteredEdge
yeah its all in our heads for sure, the brain is amazing, all of the above hypothesis really interesting. one day hopefully we might figure it out.
Collins
I hope that this hypothesis might be proved true
Debabrata
I feel deja vu is kind of a wormhole which connects us to a parallel universe.
geometry
I like what you said 'alterededge' "dena vu" is a vision of a past memory reenacting itself at an unexpected time and place. traveling and transitioning through dimensions.
Alba
opps, "deja vu"***
Alba
you are are right Geometry Lover.
Alba
Deja vu might even prove the existence of future time travel.
geometry
Well I'm not exactly saying it's a memory, it still hasn't happened yet, more like subconscious pre-cognitive thinking, where your mind eventually leads you down a path that makes the "deja vu" experience reality true after you had it.
AlteredEdge
We says time as a 3rd dimension and space as a fourth dim, so as come to 5 dimension what we say? I hope you got my point
Asim
According to string theory there are 10 dimensions
Debabrata
Yes you are right Mishra
Asim
But Tesseract is said to be 5 dim
Asim
How?
Asim
How do giants planets remain gaseous when they are located in cold regions of the solar system? Do they generate enough heat and if they do, are they not able to also heat their moons?
Kuda
Kuda just to answer part of your question. The gas inside Saturn for example is extremely dense not like gas in a room. The definition of gas is that the particles have little to no interaction between each other meaning there's no chemical bonds.
Sandra
hello ,what kind of question is that?
Bata Reply
what is weather
Susil Reply
Hey guys, question. It is said that Uranus' famous axial tilt of 98 degrees was caused by collisions billions of years ago. How can a celestial body/object 'collide' with a body (Uranus) which is made up of gas and has no surface?
Joey Reply
Although Uranus has no phyiscal surface, it still has a core. It's possible that in the early stages of the solar system, a rouge planet or moon tore through the upper levels of the atmosphere and was able to penetrate the lower cloud levels and eventually reach gas giant's core.
AlteredEdge
are there aliens in the universe?
Lesego Reply
might be possible but there is no true evidence of it.we can only assume because we don't know the exact size of universe,it's infinite,so possibilities always shown is in infinite.
Near
might be possible because UFO's are being seen on earth
Vinay
is also a little ridiculous
Tracy
I feel I need to confess the only life the universe created for us to see and feel is the one in human form on Earth. its possible we make ourselves sick straining our thoughts to think of connecting with human life on or in any other realm other than the one we are in.
Alba
goodnight, I will continue our conversation tomorrow.
Alba
there was nothing created for anyone, its literally just there, there is no reason, it just is, don't be dumb
Tracy
We Are Not Special, We Just Happen To Be The Species That Evolution Has Shaped So Far.....
Adam
If the universe is limitless, life could be limitless as well. According to science and mathematics of course!
stijn
how?
Emilya
The universe is so vast and complicated it's impossible to ever rule out the possibility of intelligent life, but the gradual realization by human society is that we are not "special" in any given way. I recommend everyone here watch Issac Arthur on Youtube, he takes a look into the Fermi Paradox.
AlteredEdge
Thank You AlteredEdge, I Will Check It Out.....
Adam
Adam i have a question
Asim
Why does traveling at close to light speed or being near super dense objects cause time to dilate?
Andrew Reply
good question. time is only what we made it. the way light travels with and without gravity has always been a wonder to me.
Collins
What do you mean without gravity?
Andrew
I'm actually not sure, this might be a silly question but does gravity effect light in respect to time?
Collins
As you move faster the slower the time
Asim
yes , gravity can effect light you can take example of black holes .
YOG
yes this makes sense, so do we know what kindo of effect it has on time around a black hole?
Collins
Since a black hole has an extreme amount of mass compacted into such a tight density, it warps space and time around it. Why? The main reason is gravity. It is always the dominant factor in black holes. Light in this case is absorbed like everything else.
AlteredEdge
Time in a black hole is slowed down compared to outside the black hole, this again is caused by gravity. Same principle works on Earth.
AlteredEdge
but black holes only bends space-time febric and light didn't change its path it always travel in straight line but the space febric is curved so it looks like that light bend or obserbed by black holes.
YOG
Black Holes do bend the fabric of space-time, but light is no exception. Light is matter just like everything else.
AlteredEdge
this is great info/convo. without a black hole, does gravity effect light in any other way,? like the way water bends light. just curious if the knowledge is there, any site recommendations for research, would be greatly appreciated.
Collins
So like your saying, outside of the extreme of a black hole, light travels in a straight line. However when it comes in contact with a large mass (lets say the sun) it curves space around it. So from an outward appearance the light bends to the gravity which causes what we call gravitational lensing
AlteredEdge
yes exactly, ok wow yes that makes alot of sense, thank you very much for this info/feedback, gravity seems like the top of the food chain in the universe, trying to find out, for my own research, how much we know about it to date and its affect on other objects/masses etc. thanks again
Collins
Of course! Also to help you out incase you didn't already know, but gravity travels in waves and varies in strength.
AlteredEdge
wow ok I did not know that either, thank you,. slightly like the way sound travels maybe? other info I will be glad to hear if your sharing, thanks again AlteredEdge
Collins
what is the definitions of planet
Mitrajit Reply
A celestial body orbiting around a star
Asim
How to appear for MCQ in this app
nitisha Reply
I l don't understand questions
Nkateko Reply
which quesrions?
Ankit
let it be
nitisha
How to make a telescope
Amit Reply
***youtube.com/channel/UClBN_RpR5X8IdrARwnaL3fg
Steve
***wikihow.com/Make-a-Telescope
Jennifer
optical mechanics
Astro
aptical
Nkateko
Why the God make universal ?
Trung
because God itself don't know.
Near
Which one has the ring
Isaac Reply
Saturn venue and even Jupiter all have rings the rings on Jupiter, however, aren't so easily noticed due to them only being viable through infrared
Hunter
visible *
Hunter
they each have three rings but not as you might think just think of them all as one big ring because that's basically what they are but they are desperate individual rings
Hunter
separate*
Hunter
can you tell me what is a quantam elighment? Lets see how many people give write answers
gdjm Reply
can you tell me what is a fomalhaut?
gdjm
Fomalhaut Is The Brightest Star In The Constalellation Of Piscis Austrinus.....
Adam
joe.
Tracy
Do You Mean Quantum Entanglement?
Adam
yes
gdjm
No Adam fomalhaut mean eye of universe
gdjm
quantum entanglement is when a husband has been married so long to his wife that he is directly influenced by her action usually in an opposite way. 🤣
Jocofranc
It Is Also The Brightest Star Of The The Constalellation Of Piscis Austrinus.....
Adam
who was the first person to get to the planet
Isaac
Is 5 dimensional exists
Asim
Hello
Asim
Hi, have u read about the many dimensions we possibly have? it's more than 5.
Collins
there are 11 dimensions acc. to the M theory, 10 acc. to string theory and 26 acc. to bosonic theory. but we basically follow the M theory ..
BHUMI
thanks for clearing that up.
Collins
Adam
Asim
Practice Key Terms 2

Get the best Astronomy course in your pocket!





Source:  OpenStax, Astronomy. OpenStax CNX. Apr 12, 2017 Download for free at http://cnx.org/content/col11992/1.13
Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.

Notification Switch

Would you like to follow the 'Astronomy' conversation and receive update notifications?

Ask